UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/ Hagnat vs Iscariot

Administration Services — Protection. This page has been protected against editing. See the archive of recent actions or the Protections log.

Hagnat vs Iscariot

I would like to open a case against Iscariot, on the basis that he is a total jackass against the administration staff for no good reason. I would like to put an end to his meaningless idiocy against the administration staff. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{talk mod} 01:32, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

I accept this case and will represent myself. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Since you have a long history of refusing arbitrators, i invite you to name those whom you'd accept. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{talk mod} 01:40, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Since you have a long history of lying, ignoring precedent and making shit up, I invite you to outline your case and what you're looking to achieve in a verdict (completely, you know how I hate loopholes) before I begin to consider arbitrators. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:47, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

This will be further explained once the arbitration process begins. Now, name people whom you'd accept. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{talk mod} 01:50, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Now you know attempting to browbeat me won't work. This is highly relevant to my choice of arbitrator, if you are seeking me to make my sig pink in colour for 10 minutes I won't much care on my choice of arbitrator, if you are seeking something else that will influence my potential choices. I invite you to display good faith in the process by assisting me in this matter through the details I have requested. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 01:56, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

I'll offer to arbitrate this case, since I'm fairly new and should be mostly impartial. Disclaimer: This would be my first case. --Pestolence^(talk) 01:42, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

This case is completely fucking retarded, as by extension is Hangnut. He should know that you can't restrict people from bringing not-obviously frivolous cases up on administration pages. --HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS 04:56, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

I could swear Vista warned someone about that in the past.--Karek^maps?! 05:12, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Do we assume that Hagnat has abandoned this case? He has time to abuse his status and push his agenda against me on the other admin pages but fails to put in an appearance here. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 03:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

For chris sake... its been less than two days since this case started and you already want to end it ? I asked you to name those whom you'd accept to arbitrate this case, and you are the one who is refusing. My reasons for arbitration are already presented, and there is no further need to explain them unless we continue with this thing. -People's Commissar Hagnat ^{talk mod} 03:17, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

I have explained why it is relevant to my choice what you'd want as a resolution. Go right ahead and go for anything you want, just be very clear and concise about it. That will allow me to select appropriate arbitrators. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 03:22, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Hagnat, actually move the case forward by filing a basic summary or I'm archiving this for you failing to provide the minimum required by the rules of this page. --Karek^maps?! 08:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Still waiting on Hagnat displaying any form of good faith or abiding by the rules that everyone else on this wiki has to follow.... -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 04:26, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

IMO Hagnat has had long enough to respond. Archive this bullshit, someone, and get on with life? --WanYao 00:22, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

I'd actually forgotten about this. It's odd that he has time to go comment in-depth on another case I'm involved with, but not move this one forward. Yeah, trusted user....

It's just a shame that people can't be escalated for frivolously filing arbitration cases.... -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 00:25, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Funny, you could say the same thing for vandal banning and misconduct cases couldn't you? -- Cheese 00:27, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Upset because you can't follow the basic standards of sysop conduct? Perhaps you should go demote yourself until you can perform those duties as the community expects. Alternately you could try and wikigate me to death, good luck! -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 00:31, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Just in case you missed it: Iscariot <> community. There's always A/PM if you think you can do better. -- Cheese 00:34, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

What a shame! I thought you had more brain cells than Conndraka, never mind. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 00:37, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

He's already outlined his case, and what he wants out of it... his case is that Iscariot "is a total jackass against the administration staff for no good reason" and what he wants out of it is "to put an end to his meaningless idiocy against the administration staff". It's not much of a case, but I think that's plenty of detail for arbitrators to be selected on. Get to it, have it out, and move on -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 23:56 29 December 2008 (BST)