UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Boxy/2009-09-11 Misconduct

Administration » Sysop Archives » Boxy » 2009-09-11 Misconduct

11 September, 2009

Blocked me but didn't leave a note on my talk or attempt to inform me in any way--xoxo 07:18, 11 September 2009 (BST)

The 'You've been blocked' message tends to be a dead giveaway. --Karek^maps?! 20:09, 11 September 2009 (BST)

To say nothing of the fact that he's a more frequent visitor to A/VB than me. There was no chance of him missing the ruling -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 02:47 13 September 2009 (BST)

Not Misconduct - I should speak with your mother the next time I see her about moving your bedtime back to 8:30. Cyberbob  Talk  08:06, 11 September 2009 (BST)

you're as original as a 13 year old emo girl.--CyberRead240 08:29, 11 September 2009 (BST)

you are a 13 year old emo girl. Cyberbob  Talk  08:32, 11 September 2009 (BST)

zzzzzzzzap Cyberbob  Talk  08:33, 11 September 2009 (BST)

OMG WAT A FAYL CALL U HAD DERE ;)--CyberRead240 08:34, 11 September 2009 (BST)

Not Misconduct --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 03:48, 12 September 2009 (BST)

One more ruling and I'll be happy to close this. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 15:35, 12 September 2009 (BST)

Having looked over the policy in question, it is clear that sysops are under no requirement to place messages on the talk pages of banned users, indeed it is not actually a requirement to warn them on their talk page either. By the wording of the policy a user could be warned on any pages where a sysop could demonstrate they had received the warning. Perhaps if the community thinks this to be unfair that they should move for clarity by creating an amendment at A/PD. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 16:58, 12 September 2009 (BST)

Not Misconduct - but sysops should place notes saying "You have been banned and here's why" on a user's talk page, even if it's not required by policy. Linkthewindow  Talk  05:09, 13 September 2009 (BST)