UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob240 vs TerminalFailure

Okay, at first I supported Sonny in the Sonny vs TF case.... I still do.... but these arbies against TF are getting more and more ridiculous! The Sonny vs TF one makes sense, the TF vs Sonny and AS makes sense.... but these other ones are just stupid.... can't we just have a chat with him on his talk page about indenting and get over this???--/~Rakuen~\^Talk I Still Love Grim 18:18, 31 March 2008 (BST)

That's what I supported at the beginning. Once the case is put up, however, if he failed to respond in a set amount of time (i.e. ignoring it as a frivolous case), then he would have been ruled against in absentia. --Akule ^{Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™} 20:26, 6 April 2008 (BST)

I don't like your tone Akule at all. You are coming across as condesending. If I was TerminalFaliure I would tell you were to stick your indents. Oh, and have you convieniantly forgot how Cyberbob is not using properer indenting in the arbritration case...surely Cyberbob should be forced to abide by the guidelines as well? --Thekooks 19:11, 2 April 2008 (BST)

I think you are inferring unintended emotions in the tone of my statements. Right now I'm doing a basic overview to cover the bases in order to make sure that he actually knows how to indent. Once we cover that, I'd like to talk with him about his indenting habits and see if it is just laziness or if he is trying to do it to piss people off. If he's doing it to disrupt the flow of conversations, then he'd be intentionally harassing people on a very minor scale. As for Cyberbob's post, I had him replace some of my text in order to start the discussion. Now, if Terminal can display that he now knows how to indent and is willing to do so, then we can probably go without incident. --Akule ^{Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™} 20:26, 6 April 2008 (BST)

Are you really surprised Terminal doesn't want to participate? Arbitration has now, twice, been used to get absurd punishments on him, and here he's in arbitration again over something that isn't even valid for arbitration, you can not force a user to indent, it's a matter of preference, if you want his replies indented do it yourself.--Karek^maps?! 23:49, 6 April 2008 (BST)

I think this is a perfect issue for arbitration, actually. I don't see why anyone should have to do anything for him. --Cyberbob ^{DORIS CGR U!} 05:44, 7 April 2008 (BST)

Really, then please, tell me what possible ruling is possible in this case?--Karek^maps?! 10:48, 7 April 2008 (BST)

"Do your fricking indenting or else" seems like the most likely to me... --Nitro378 ^{T JNL} 11:01, 7 April 2008 (BST)

That's kinda my point, there's no enforceable "or else" without abusing Arbitration.--Karek^maps?! 11:07, 7 April 2008 (BST)

A trip to A/VB has always been the punishment for breaking an arbitration ruling. Stick a tampon in it already. --Cyberbob ^{DORIS CGR U!} 09:07, 8 April 2008 (BST)

Better to try and work it out here than a de-facto arbitration ruling without his presence. --Akule ^{Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™} 21:49, 8 April 2008 (BST)