User talk:Chrono
Chrono may I salute you for your brave endevaours to have the truth about NARC proclaimed for all to see. I see the moderators have mistakenly listed them as a human group but then I suppose that there is no category for Renfield groups yet.
To the moderators, you have warned Chrono for vandalising this Renfields group page. What is the correct proceedure for adding a non point of view section to the start of their page indicating that this group is suspected of being Renfields and that readers should be aware of this when reading their page?
Group pages should be seperated into two individual sections. At the top of the page, there should be a section in proper Wiki format with a neutral POV analysis of the group. All users should be allowed to make changes to this section in the interest of improving the article. Below this, there should be a clearly divided section where the group members can put up things like barricade plans, objectives, and manifestos. However, I feel as if the following things should NOT be allowed on group pages, or indeed anywhere on the Wiki:
Retrieved from [1]
--Celt Mac Éireann • talk • W! 14:47, 6 June 2006 (BST)
As in would the information that is kept there be subject to alteration by the owners of the group page? Ie If someone added a neutral overview of the group, and the mods agreed it was a neutral view, but the group took offense to it and removed/altered it would they be in the wrong?
And I do applaud you Chrono for trying to reveal what we suspect is the true face of the NARC. I haven't seen a single member of the group active in the game, seen a single revive by them or any trace of their existance as a formal group other than this wikipage. However Lance Link counts himself as one of their members, and Lance Link is a highly sought after PKer. That and they refuse to co-operate in any way/shape/form with the groups already in the suburb, only sabotage our efforts by spreading propoganda about a revive point they don't maintain or operate. --Lachton 19:40, 7 June 2006 (BST)
- I was originally under the impression that you could. Unfortunately, the rules are ridiculous at the moment; they have near full carte blanche over their page. It's a fucking disgrace — what's the point of having a provision for an "NPOV" paragraph if they are allowed revert to POV, or delete it entirely? –Xoid S•T•FU! 03:51, 8 June 2006 (BST)
Vandal Report
You have been reported for vandalising the New Arkham Revive Club's page. The report may be found here. Have a nice day. --A Bothan Spy Mod WTF U! 16:48, 4 June 2006 (BST)
Your Official Warning
Please do not vandalise this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, you may be banned from editing the wiki. –Xoid S•T•FU! 16:55, 4 June 2006 (BST)
NARC
Chrono, you have to stop editing NARC's wiki page. I happen to agree with all your points, but playing the vandel just makes them look like the victim. --Jonny America 23:55, 22 June 2006 (BST)
