User talk:General shkkf

Hi there. I know you're new, so I just wanted to point out that I've spent quite a bit of time reverting some of your incorrect edits on this wiki, and I'm here to ask you to think a little bit harder before making changes. The suburb reports and danger levels need to be edited from a NPOV (Non Point Of View) attitude. You may think that Extinction is the best and biggest thing since sliced bread, but that doesn't mean it's shaking the historical foundations of Malton. Taking down a single NT in Quarlesbank does not make it a "Very Dangerous" suburb. Look at the definition for "Very Dangerous" below the Suburb Danger Map, and I think you'll understand what I mean. I have no idea why you decided that Rhodenbank was "Safe" when it's clearly overrun by a large zombie horde which has wrecked most of the burb. Additionally, suburbs of note are those that are voted on as historic, otherwise any old chump (me or you) could just say ALL the suburbs are noteworthy, which sort of defeats the purpose. Finally, by posting this here, I am trying to be friendly and helpful. However, if you choose to ignore my advice and continue to cause me extra work by posting NPOV reports and inaccurate danger levels, my next step will be to report you to A/VB (Vandal Banning), as I simply don't have the time or energy to follow your edits around and correct them. Cheers! --Funt Solo ^QT 20:58, 21 September 2008 (BST)