User talk:THE TERMINATOR
 |
DSS Satellite Phone Info |
| THE TERMINATOR has a DSS Satellite Phone and may be reached at 890-3307 |
I am to be contacted here, by satellite phone or my e-mail terminatorseries800model101@gmail.com
Welcome
I've notice your first edits on this wiki were not that long ago, so allow me to be the first to welcome you to this wiki. Everything that you may need to know are located on this page, and if you ever have a question, feel free to ask me. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 18:59, 24 August 2010 (BST)
Test
Testing my signature. --
SDN 11:09, 8 September 2010 (BST)
- Fucking. Awesome. Sig.-- Rolfe Steiner Talk | Creedy Guerrilla Raiders 02:37, 9 September 2010 (BST)
- Thank you. I thought it was appropriate enough. -- SDN 11:35, 9 September 2010 (BST)
Signature
I want to work on a neat signature, how did you do it? I want mine to link to BLADES IS WATCHIN'. --Blades 11:58, 9 September 2010 (BST)
- Simple. The instructions are here. It must also link to your userpage. -- SDN 12:03, 9 September 2010 (BST)
- Thanks, I think I got the hang of it. --BLADES...| BLADES IS WATCHIN' | 03:34, 4 October 2010 (BST)
Contact request
Skynet Defense Network is veeeeeery interested in you and your fellow terminators. How awesome would it be to have a real life cybernetic organism (living tissue over metal endoskeleton) or several of them as allies? Posting on the groups discussion page, despite your loose structure. Leon Silverblood 16:09, 14 September 2010 (BST)
- I am now your ally and will help you in your mission to terminate the undead/hostile survivor threat. -- SDN 22:04, 14 September 2010 (BST)
Natasha Fatale
is the same person as Bad Attitude Barbie.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature3 17:25, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- I know. -- SDN 17:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Welcome Newbie
Just a heads up...Before you actually welcome the "newbie", check their contributions first. You may also like to check Vandal Banning to make sure the "newbie" you are welcoming isn't a perma-banned vandal. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 22:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- User contributions are always scanned prior to edits. Without having IP address access, there was insufficient evidence to prove Pikachu was a vandal account, unless the accounts were thoroughly scanned. Your heads up is not required. -- SDN 00:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- On closer inspection, your welcome to Pikachu was issued a day after it was banned. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 00:59, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. Vandal banning information was not contained in said user contributions. Not an error. -- SDN 01:46, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- The banning of vandals don't show up on their contribs. That, you need to look up separately, which is why we have A/VB. There is also the Block Logs you can have a look at. The point being here is: don't welcome already banned vandals. It's just a waste of time, and people will be thinking you're a WN-ing idiot for not double-checking (like so...). --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 02:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- You're right. I'm wasting my time. The opinions of others are irrelevant as it seems to lead to nothing but drama and petty human squabbles. -- SDN 02:59, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- The banning of vandals don't show up on their contribs. That, you need to look up separately, which is why we have A/VB. There is also the Block Logs you can have a look at. The point being here is: don't welcome already banned vandals. It's just a waste of time, and people will be thinking you're a WN-ing idiot for not double-checking (like so...). --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 02:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. Vandal banning information was not contained in said user contributions. Not an error. -- SDN 01:46, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- On closer inspection, your welcome to Pikachu was issued a day after it was banned. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 00:59, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
