User talk:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sandbox3

Just breakin' the redirect. It's basically making your policy breaking page impossible to comment on, don't see why you'd need that either considering it is useless here.--Karek^maps?! 06:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

The redirect was there to see what it would do to the page. Hagnat made a redirect Gnome, which kinda messes with my page, unfortunately. --  AHLGTG THE END IS ACTUALLY NIGH! 18:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

It's only screwing it up because of the absolute/relative positioning stuff.--Karek^maps?! 02:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Sandbox

Since this is a sandbox, can anyone (that's not Gnome) edit it? --Axe Hack Talk 21:36, 16 March 2008 (UTC) +1

I thought I already answered that... what would you add or remove? --  AHLGTG THE END IS ACTUALLY NIGH! 21:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

A logo of Homeland -- er...I mean, Gnomeland Security? --Axe Hack Talk 21:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Do your worst, but I might revert it. --  AHLGTG THE END IS ACTUALLY NIGH! 21:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Not much...but maybe you might like it... --Axe Hack Talk 21:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Nice!

I love how this page is turning out... but for some reason it reminds me of the BBC website! • DS • ^{Tlk•Dev•W!•+1} 21:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Hehe yeah. Thanks! Oh, this and this is where I found the code, by the way. --  AHLGTG THE END IS ACTUALLY NIGH! 21:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Called..

..it. _■^■ 22:38, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

So........

Its like a new front page?

Can we not have a minimap linking to each of the sections then? And wheres the "Since your last turn......" above wiki news? --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 21:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

It is a new front page. The old one is getting dull. :) --  AHLGTG THE END IS ACTUALLY NIGH! 21:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Nice. Wheres the lolcat going to fit in? --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 21:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Nowhere... silly. :P --  AHLGTG THE END IS ACTUALLY NIGH! 21:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

I agree, very nice :D. Although there's always room for lolcats. Linkthewindow  Talk  08:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Title Image

It seems to be quite dull to me; I think changing the font to more in line with Image:Dead.gif's style would be more visually appealing. The large amounts of empty spaces on the sides are also a turn-off, but perhaps adding some zombie and survivor silhouettes on opposing sides would look good. What do you think? --ZsL 04:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

A good idea. I'm probably not the best person to do it, though. --  AHLGTG THE END IS ACTUALLY NIGH! 04:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I'd like to do it but I don't know how to photoshops. :( --ZsL 04:36, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

One photochopper right here, I could always knock something up. But you'd probably want to raise this on the redesign discussion and get some more input. --  RoosterDragon  14:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

It should probably be a PNG with transparent borders, and 3 separate images so it looks best in larger screens. And not too wide so it look in smaller screens. --  AHLGTG THE END IS ACTUALLY NIGH! 15:02, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

3 separate images, really? I was just planning to make something 500px wide tops (for the small res) that would be centred. Were you thinking left, centre and right aligned image? --  RoosterDragon  15:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I meant 800px wide at most. --  RoosterDragon  15:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah. You could try both, though. See which one works best. --  AHLGTG THE END IS ACTUALLY NIGH! 15:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok, here's a quick whip up. I can do some re-aligning if it's along the right lines, or just shout if I'm off the rails. The fade out can be changed or not used if that's preferred.

--  RoosterDragon  17:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Wow, that looks really great. Maybe a little bit less faded out on the sides, though. It makes it a bit difficult to see the farthest images. --ZsL 10:10, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

TBH, I'm not a fan of it. I'd prefer to just have the logo myself. I'll tweak the fade a bit though. By the way, does anybody know what the second font is? I've seen it around the net but searching for specific fonts is always a shot in the dark. --  RoosterDragon  14:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)