UDWiki talk:Administration/Policy Discussion/Crit 12 Nukage: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Protected "UDWiki talk:Administration/Policy Discussion/Crit 12 Nukage": admin archive [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
There is a reason why policies are asked to remain a few days under discussion before going for vote. This policy, as its written, will prolly fail. Rooster's suggestion would be a good way to handle with the ''removal'' of crit 12, specially if a link to an article explaining crit 12 were created. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagnat|[talk]]] [[wcdz|[wcdz]]]</sup> 13:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC) | There is a reason why policies are asked to remain a few days under discussion before going for vote. This policy, as its written, will prolly fail. Rooster's suggestion would be a good way to handle with the ''removal'' of crit 12, specially if a link to an article explaining crit 12 were created. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagnat|[talk]]] [[wcdz|[wcdz]]]</sup> 13:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:i asked for a page explaining Crit 12, and [[UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Criterion 12|so i did]]. Now all it takes is a sysop removing the text from the A/SD guidelines, and leaving a link to this page. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagnat|[talk]]] [[wcdz|[wcdz]]]</sup> 13:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Why is this under voting when the wiki news template says it's under discussion? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 13:53, 15 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Fixed, it was never under discussion. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 20:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:42, 5 April 2009
Nothing too drastic I think. -- Cheese 21:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Won't this just make all reports before its removal for crit 13, and reports after for crit 12 (IE: missed sub pages) appear incorrect in the archive, thus requiring its own text to explain this change? At best, you could cut down the crit 12 text. EG: 12. Defunct group page - This is a old criterion for the removal of group pages, and may no longer be used as a valid speedy deletion reason. -- 
RoosterDragon 
21:44, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
There is a reason why policies are asked to remain a few days under discussion before going for vote. This policy, as its written, will prolly fail. Rooster's suggestion would be a good way to handle with the removal of crit 12, specially if a link to an article explaining crit 12 were created. --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 13:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- i asked for a page explaining Crit 12, and so i did. Now all it takes is a sysop removing the text from the A/SD guidelines, and leaving a link to this page. --People's Commissar Hagnat [talk] [wcdz] 13:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Why is this under voting when the wiki news template says it's under discussion? -- 
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 13:53, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Fixed, it was never under discussion. Linkthewindow Talk 20:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
