User talk:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sandbox3: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 48: Line 48:
:Wow, that looks really great.  Maybe a little bit less faded out on the sides, though.  It makes it a bit difficult to see the farthest images.  --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 10:10, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
:Wow, that looks really great.  Maybe a little bit less faded out on the sides, though.  It makes it a bit difficult to see the farthest images.  --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 10:10, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
::TBH, I'm not a fan of it. I'd prefer to just have the logo myself. I'll tweak the fade a bit though. By the way, does anybody know what the second font is? I've seen it around the net but searching for specific fonts is always a shot in the dark. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 14:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
::TBH, I'm not a fan of it. I'd prefer to just have the logo myself. I'll tweak the fade a bit though. By the way, does anybody know what the second font is? I've seen it around the net but searching for specific fonts is always a shot in the dark. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 14:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
:::I don't know what the second font is, and I haven't seen it around much.  It would probably be best just to have the logo in the picture, as the dark images aren't working well with the background color.  They are somewhat difficult to see.  --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 17:22, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
::::It's probably something custom. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 17:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:51, 22 February 2009

Just breakin' the redirect. It's basically making your policy breaking page impossible to comment on, don't see why you'd need that either considering it is useless here.--Karekmaps?! 06:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

The redirect was there to see what it would do to the page. Hagnat made a redirect Gnome, which kinda messes with my page, unfortunately. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 18:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
It's only screwing it up because of the absolute/relative positioning stuff.--Karekmaps?! 02:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Sandbox

Since this is a sandbox, can anyone (that's not Gnome) edit it? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:36, 16 March 2008 (UTC) +1

I thought I already answered that... what would you add or remove? --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 21:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
A logo of Homeland -- er...I mean, Gnomeland Security? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Do your worst, but I might revert it. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 21:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Not much...but maybe you might like it... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Nice!

I love how this page is turning out... but for some reason it reminds me of the BBC website! DS TlkDevW!+1 21:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Hehe yeah. Thanks! Oh, this and this is where I found the code, by the way. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 21:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Called..

..it. 22:38, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

So........

Its like a new front page?

Can we not have a minimap linking to each of the sections then? And wheres the "Since your last turn......" above wiki news? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 21:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

It is a new front page. The old one is getting dull. :) --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 21:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Nice. Wheres the lolcat going to fit in? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 21:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Nowhere... silly. :P --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 21:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
I agree, very nice :D. Although there's always room for lolcats. Linkthewindow  Talk  08:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Title Image

It seems to be quite dull to me; I think changing the font to more in line with Image:Dead.gif's style would be more visually appealing. The large amounts of empty spaces on the sides are also a turn-off, but perhaps adding some zombie and survivor silhouettes on opposing sides would look good. What do you think? --ZsL 04:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

A good idea. I'm probably not the best person to do it, though. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 04:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, I'd like to do it but I don't know how to photoshops. :( --ZsL 04:36, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
One photochopper right here, I could always knock something up. But you'd probably want to raise this on the redesign discussion and get some more input. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 14:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
It should probably be a PNG with transparent borders, and 3 separate images so it looks best in larger screens. And not too wide so it look in smaller screens. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 15:02, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
3 separate images, really? I was just planning to make something 500px wide tops (for the small res) that would be centred. Were you thinking left, centre and right aligned image? -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 15:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I meant 800px wide at most. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 15:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Yeah. You could try both, though. See which one works best. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 15:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok, here's a quick whip up. I can do some re-aligning if it's along the right lines, or just shout if I'm off the rails. The fade out can be changed or not used if that's preferred.

Urban-Dead-Header.png

-- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 17:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Wow, that looks really great. Maybe a little bit less faded out on the sides, though. It makes it a bit difficult to see the farthest images. --ZsL 10:10, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
TBH, I'm not a fan of it. I'd prefer to just have the logo myself. I'll tweak the fade a bit though. By the way, does anybody know what the second font is? I've seen it around the net but searching for specific fonts is always a shot in the dark. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 14:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
I don't know what the second font is, and I haven't seen it around much. It would probably be best just to have the logo in the picture, as the dark images aren't working well with the background color. They are somewhat difficult to see. --ZsL 17:22, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
It's probably something custom. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 17:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)