Suggestion:20090403 Alternate Fuel Can Use: Difference between revisions
Paddy Dignam (talk | contribs) |
m (Protected "Suggestion:20090403 Alternate Fuel Can Use": closed suggestion [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Removed|by the author (struck on the current suggestions list) for revision}} | |||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
| Line 36: | Line 38: | ||
'''Kill Votes''' | '''Kill Votes''' | ||
#'''Kill'''You do know you can cover the zombie with fuel and then flaregun them for double damage dont you? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 21:25, 3 April 2009 (BST) | #'''Kill'''You do know you can cover the zombie with fuel and then flaregun them for double damage dont you? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 21:25, 3 April 2009 (BST) | ||
* '''Re''' Yes, but that is more offensive, this is on the defensive side; a precaution.[[User:40poundbaby|40poundbaby]] 21:46, 3 April 2009 (BST) | |||
'''Spam/Dupe Votes''' | '''Spam/Dupe Votes''' | ||
| Line 41: | Line 44: | ||
#'''Spam''' - No.--<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel,</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 21:15, 3 April 2009 (BST) | #'''Spam''' - No.--<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel,</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 21:15, 3 April 2009 (BST) | ||
#'''Spam''' - As Moloch. I'm assuming you didn't take this to [[Developing Suggestions]] first? Next time you should do so. --{{User:Paddy Dignam/sig}} 21:31, 3 April 2009 (BST) | #'''Spam''' - As Moloch. I'm assuming you didn't take this to [[Developing Suggestions]] first? Next time you should do so. --{{User:Paddy Dignam/sig}} 21:31, 3 April 2009 (BST) | ||
*'''Re''' - I didn't want to devote the time to discussion for this suggestion seeing as it was more of a whim. I just wanted to see if it would fly today rater than waiting for a a while for discussion. As it is only a quick vote no real time was wasted, save by me. | |||
#'''Spam''' - This entire suggestion is spam. If you really want me to take it apart bring it to [[Talk:Suggestions]] for its mauling. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 21:35, 3 April 2009 (BST) | |||
'''Change''' | {{s|1='''Change'''}} | ||
{{s|1=:#'''Change''' - I think that it should be bought under the zombie hunter skill as to stop zerging and greifing. Also I assume that you cant pour fuel on the same body multiple times and the can is emptied afterwards.}} --[[User:alex1guy]] 09:24, 4 April 2009 (BST) <small>Invalid section and vote struck -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 21:35, 3 April 2009 (BST)</small> | |||
[[ | |||
</ | |||
Latest revision as of 23:15, 3 April 2009
|
Removed |
| This suggestion has been removed from voting by the author (struck on the current suggestions list) for revision. |
20090403 Alternate Fuel Can Use
40poundbaby 21:05, 3 April 2009 (BST)
Suggestion type
Improvement
Suggestion scope
Fuel Cans, Corpses
Suggestion description
Rather than the Fuel Can only be used for a practical purpose a survivor can douse a corpse in fuel then light it by shooting the flammable area. (The assumed action is that you hit something that can spark.)
This action would then cause the corpse to spend an Extra 5AP to stand up. It can only be used on one corpse.
Seeing as most survivors are not stocked on fuel cans it is unlikely that people will abuse this.
It does not efficiently bypass the Zombie Hunter skill seeing as it is hard to find a fuel can.
It makes the survivor choose to use it for light, or use it to help defend his current building.
It will help with mall sieges, BUT not enough to push the balance either way. This is because it can only be used on one corpse, and not every person in the mall will be carrying one.
Voting Section
| Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user. |
| The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
Keep Votes
- Keep - Since you cant expect everybody to have a fuel can, it wouldn't be easy to exploit for griefing. Amandie 21:18, 3 April 2009 (BST)
Kill Votes
- KillYou do know you can cover the zombie with fuel and then flaregun them for double damage dont you? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 21:25, 3 April 2009 (BST)
- Re Yes, but that is more offensive, this is on the defensive side; a precaution.40poundbaby 21:46, 3 April 2009 (BST)
Spam/Dupe Votes
- Spam - A griefer's dream. Action points are people's playing time. Do not fuck with them. --Papa Moloch 21:14, 3 April 2009 (BST)
- Spam - No.--Suicidal Angel, Help needed? 21:15, 3 April 2009 (BST)
- Spam - As Moloch. I'm assuming you didn't take this to Developing Suggestions first? Next time you should do so. --Paddy DignamIS DEAD 21:31, 3 April 2009 (BST)
- Re - I didn't want to devote the time to discussion for this suggestion seeing as it was more of a whim. I just wanted to see if it would fly today rater than waiting for a a while for discussion. As it is only a quick vote no real time was wasted, save by me.
- Spam - This entire suggestion is spam. If you really want me to take it apart bring it to Talk:Suggestions for its mauling. --
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 21:35, 3 April 2009 (BST)
Change
:#Change - I think that it should be bought under the zombie hunter skill as to stop zerging and greifing. Also I assume that you cant pour fuel on the same body multiple times and the can is emptied afterwards. --User:alex1guy 09:24, 4 April 2009 (BST) Invalid section and vote struck -- 
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 21:35, 3 April 2009 (BST)
