Developing Suggestions: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Suggestion Navigation}}[[Category:Suggestions]]
<noinclude>{{Developing Suggestions Intro}}</noinclude>
==Developing Suggestions==
''This section is for presenting and reviewing suggestions which '''have not yet been submitted''' and are still being worked on.''


''Nothing on this page will be archived.''


===Further Discussion===
===Ignore based on Radio Broadcast===
*Discussion concerning this page takes place [[Talk:Developing Suggestions|here]].
*Discussion concerning the suggestions system in general, including policies about it, takes place [[:Category_talk:Suggestions#Suggestion_Discussion|here]].
 
 
==Please Read Before Posting==
*'''Be sure to check <big>[[Frequently Suggested#The List|The Frequently Suggested List]]</big> and the [[Suggestions Dos and Do Nots]] before you post your idea.''' You can read about many ideas that have been suggested already, which users should be aware of before posting what could be a '''dupe''': a duplicate of an existing suggestion. '''These include [[Suggestions/RejectedNovember2005#SMG.2FMachine_Pistol|Machine Guns]] and [[Suggestions/19th-Nov-2005#Sniper_Rifle|Sniper Rifles]].'''
*Users should be aware that page is discussion oriented. Other users are free to express their own point of view and are not required to be neutral.
*If you decide not to take your suggestion to voting, please remove it from this page to avoid clutter.
*It is recommended that users spend some time familiarizing themselves with this page before posting their own suggestions.
*''After new game updates, users are requested to allow time for the game and community to adjust to these changes '''before''' suggesting alterations.''
 
==How To Make a Suggestion==
===Adding a New Suggestion===
*Copy the code in the box below.
*<span class="stealthexternallink">[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Developing_Suggestions&action=edit&section=7 Click here to begin editing.]</span> This is the same as clicking the [edit] link to the right of the [[Developing Suggestions#Suggestions|Suggestions]] header.
 
*Paste the copied text '''above''' the other suggestions, right under the heading.
*Substitute the text in <font color="red">RED CAPITALS</font> with the details of your suggestion.
 
<nowiki>{{subst:DevelopingSuggestion
|time=~~~~
|name=</nowiki><font color="red">SUGGESTION NAME</font><nowiki>
|type=</nowiki><font color="red">TYPE HERE</font><nowiki>
|scope=</nowiki><font color="red">SCOPE HERE</font><nowiki>
|description=</nowiki><font color="red">DESCRIPTION HERE</font><nowiki>
}}</nowiki>
 
*'''Name''' - Give the suggestion a short but descriptive name.
*'''Type''' is the nature of the suggestion, such as a ''new class'', ''skill change'', ''balance change'', etc. Basically: '''What is it?''' and '''Is it new, or a change?'''
*'''Scope''' is who or what the suggestion affects. Typically ''survivors'' or ''zombies'' (or both), but occasionally ''Malton'', the game ''interface'' or something else.
*'''Description''' should be a full explanation of your suggestion. Include information like flavor text, search odds, hit percentages, etc, as appropriate. Unless you are as yet unsure of the exact details behind the suggestion, try not to leave out anything important. Check your spelling and grammar.
 
===Cycling Suggestions===
*Suggestions with no new discussion in the past two days should be given a warning notice. This can be done by adding {{CodeInline|1='''<nowiki>{{SDW|</nowiki><font color="darkred">date</font><nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''}} at the top of the discussion section, where <font color="darkred">date</font> is the day the suggestion will be removed.
*Suggestions with no new discussion in the past week may be removed.
*If you are adding a comment to a suggestion that has the warning template please remove the {{CodeInline|1='''<nowiki>{{SDW|</nowiki><font color="darkred">date</font><nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''}} at the top of the discussion section to show that there is still ongoing discussion.
 
This page is prone to breaking when the page gets too long, so sometimes suggestions still under discussion will be moved to the [[Developing Suggestions/Overflow1|Overflow page]], so the discussion can continue.
 
 
__TOC__
 
<span style="font-size:1.75em; color:red">'''Please add new suggestions to the top of the list'''</span>
----
 
==Suggestions==
===Playing Cards===
{|
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' {{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 19:35, 19 September 2009 (BST)
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Khwud|Khwud]] ([[User talk:Khwud|talk]]) 17:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
|-
|-
|'''Type:''' New flavor item
|'''Type:''' UI enhancement
|-
|-
|'''Scope:''' Humans
|'''Scope:''' Interface
|-
|-
|'''Description:''' There would be a new flavor item, Deck of Cards (encumbrance 1%). The search rates would be ''Hotels/Motels (5%), Mall Bookstore (3%), Barracks (3%), Mansions (2%)''. Clicking on it in your inventory costs 1 AP, chooses a random card, and returns the flavor text: {{udspan|You draw a ''random card name''.}}
|'''Description:''' Allow 'ignore' from radio broadcasts; users are hiding behind their anonymity to allow them to broadcast things that would broadly trigger them to be ignored, if their user ID was visible. Adding their name, or an auto-generated call-sign (it is for a radio, after all) or something so that they could be blocked based on their broadcasts would help user experience. In addition, and broadcasts that get more than a threshold number could get tagged for review, and the user potentially having their (in-game) ham-license revoked.
 
When in a room with another survivor, there would be a button next to the Speak button, "Show Card to ''<nowiki>[list of players]</nowiki>'' (1 AP)". The RNG would choose a random card and the player you selected would recieve the message, {{udspan|''Player name'' draws a ''random card name'' and shows it to you.}} You would recieve the message, {{udspan|You draw a ''random card name'' and show it to ''player name''.}} To avoid text spam, you could have the option to ignore all card messages. Showing a card to a player who is ignoring card messages costs 0 AP and gives you the message, "This player has chosen to ignore card messages."
 
You can attack with a deck of cards, 100% accuracy and 0 damage. The deck disappears from your inventory and you get the message, "You fling the deck of cards at ''player''." The target gets the message, "''Player'' flung a deck of cards at you."
 
Please don't try to use these arguments:
*'''This is useless flavor!!!1!''' Didn't Devorac [[User:Devorac#My_rant_against_people_who_will_kill_a_suggestion_due_to_what_the_call_.22useless_flavor.22.|tell you off before]]?
*'''This wastes inventory space!''' It's only 1%, plus, dropping it costs 0 AP.
*'''This dilutes search rates!''' Barracks, Mansions, Hotels, and Bookstores have NEVER been TRPs. So you search in them ''expecting'' useless flavor items.
*'''This is text spam!''' No it isn't. You can choose to ignore it.
*'''What's the point?''' I dunno, role playing, more entertainment. Really, this is no worse than poetry books or newspapers.
*'''SPAM!!! OMG!!1!!!!''' {{Troll}}
|}
|}
====Discussion (Playing Cards)====
====Discussion (Ignore based on Radio Broadcast)====
Firstly, don't you dare try and dictate what points the users on this page can and cannot use to debate your suggestion. That annoys me, annoying me makes me get the dupes out on every suggestion you actually put into the main system. Trust me, I can do this, I'm that good.
 
Secondly, if you don't know the point of your own suggestion I despair. I can think of several uses for something similar, however it's up to you to work them out, and survivors aren't going to be the main user of these as you've written it. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 19:41, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:He's not trying to "dictate what points the users on this page can and cannot use to debate your suggestion", he's simply countering the arguments before they're made. Feel free to refute his points if you object to the suggestion in any way. I also believe the "I dunno" he has said is more a dismissive gesture than an actual statement of lack of knowledge. I advise you as well against making threats to abuse the dupe system, as it doesn't really reflect too well on your character. Why not help the poor guy with some constructive insights? I do admit he could have presented his suggestion better, but still, I've seen worse. --[[User:Anotherpongo|Anotherpongo]] 19:56, 19 September 2009 (BST)
----
----
 
===Shrink the map===
===High Variance Attack for Zombies===
{|
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Anotherpongo|Anotherpongo]] 15:53, 19 September 2009 (BST)
|'''Timestamp:''' --[[User:Uroguy|Uroguy]]<sup>[[Zookeepers|TMZ]]</sup> 16:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
|-
|-
|'''Type:''' Attack
|'''Type:''' Map change
|-
|-
|'''Scope:''' Lone, Low AP Zombies
|'''Scope:''' Everyone
|-
|-
|'''Description:''' New attack "Savage", requiring skill of same name, child skill of Rend Flesh. It would do 15 damage at 7% hit rate giving 1.05 damage / AP, making it no more effective than hands with Rend Flesh + Vigour Mortis. Death Grip would give the attack a 9.5% hit rate giving it 1.425 damage / AP, making it slightly less effective than hands with Rend Flesh, Vigour Mortis and Death Grip. It would however have a much higher variance, making lucky lone zombies with few AP to spare more dangerous, particularly to low HP survivors, and allowing zombies to get extra XP from kills in a similiar manner to survivors with flare guns. Tangling Grasp would have no effect on this attack.
|'''Description:''' There are just over 3000 active characters in the game currently likely counting a significant percentage of alts and zergs. Shrinking the map by eliminating the outer first two rings of suburbs would increase the amount of interactions between the remaining characters. This shrink could be increased or decreased depending on future changes to the playerbase.
 
:Variance of maxed claw: 2.3
:Variance of maxed bite: 3.4
:Variance of maxed savage: 19.3
|}
|}
====Discussion (High-Variance Attack for Zombies)====
====Discussion (Shrink the map)====
15 damage? What the hell? What on earth is a zombie going to do which parallels being hit by a flare gun?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 15:55, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:Hmm, well the big problem here is that, as you may know, the RNG isn't exactly random.  For those who subscribe to groove theory, the ability to land 15HP of damage rather consistently would be very powerful indeed.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 15:59, 19 September 2009 (BST)
::Giles: That is a problem with the RNG rather than this suggestion. Koponen: Higher variance, as I said. --[[User:Anotherpongo|Anotherpongo]] 16:04, 19 September 2009 (BST)
::: There are a great deal of things a zombie could do to deal 15 damage, rip out your throat, do an amateur appendectomy, rip out a few feet of intestine, you know... gory wicked messy zombie stuff. personally I can't see this getting a lot of use, my survivor never carries a flare gun for any reason, and my zombie usually sticks to claws over anything else. I don't know if it will be used but I'm willing to try it. -[[User:Devorac|Devorac]] 16:16, 19 September 2009 (BST)
::::I like this idea. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 16:25, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:::Try answering my question.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 16:51, 19 September 2009 (BST)
::::This attack is more likely to deviate from the average damage making it more useful in a situation where the average damage is not sufficient but less useful in a situation where it is. It allows a lone zombie without sufficient AP to kill using claws or bite more chance of killing or severely injuring a survivor. It makes lone zombies breaking into poorly fortified safehouses that bit more dangerous. It may also allow zombies some extra XP from "overkill" damage. I hope that answers your question, if it doesn't please rephrase it, as I'm not sure I understand it fully. --[[User:Anotherpongo|Anotherpongo]] 17:46, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:::::How would a zombie do the damage? Answer the question, stop just explaining what your suggestion does.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 17:56, 19 September 2009 (BST)
::::::My apologies, I did not understand your question. A zombie could damage internal organs, sever limbs, etc. --[[User:Anotherpongo|Anotherpongo]] 19:43, 19 September 2009 (BST)
 
I like the look of it but (its a big but) flare guns are the comparable survivor attack and need searching for which makes their use somewhat rare. A zombie with this would be able to do it at whim.... Perhaps making this a kind of critical hit that is only possible once you take the skill. Instead of choosing to make such an attack the system would just check against a suitably low percentage as to whether this triggers instead of a normal attack. Oh and I think 15 damage might well be a bit OTT, maybe 10damage and some suitably nasty flavour text instead --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 17:34, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:This attack is no more damaging on average than other attacks available at the same skill level, and it is deliberately less powerful than flare gun attacks to account for that searching. However, I do like your "critical hit" idea. --[[User:Anotherpongo|Anotherpongo]] 17:44, 19 September 2009 (BST)
::Umm, it isn't weaker than flare gun attacks?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 17:56, 19 September 2009 (BST)
::It is because it is less accurate and requires a skill to use, however...
:::::The problem with weakening it a bit to balance searching is that I can still always use it as my last attack or 2 each day. while the numbers balance out in the long run the tactical ability to choose when to try this makes it much, much more valuable than those numbers would suggest. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 18:01, 19 September 2009 (BST)
Ridiculously OP; We all know the RNG isn't perfect, and I don't want to be nailed by four of these in quick succession... Any serious zombie break-in already spells inevitable doom for the survivors inside, so why bother with something so potentially game-breaking? {{User:Lelouch/sig}} 17:58, 19 September 2009 (BST)
::::::I did have the idea of making it so that its accuracy reduced with every zombie present nearby, possibly (but not definitely) by 1% per zombie down to a minimum of 2.5%. Would that improve it? I'm also open to the idea of somehow adding conditions its use, but I'm not sure how that could be implemented. And yes, you could use it for your last couple attacks... and occasionally get lucky. That's the whole point; it makes being a low HP survivor when a lone feral knocks down the cades that bit more risky. It makes playing as a zombie occasionally that bit more rewarding. --[[User:Anotherpongo|Anotherpongo]] 19:41, 19 September 2009 (BST)
----
----


===Ballistics Training===
===Action Points===
{|
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Misanthropy|Misanthropy]] 15:02, 19 September 2009 (BST)
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Wolldog1]] 10:07, 26 July 26, 2022
|-
|-
|'''Type:''' New skill
|'''Type:''' Action Points Increase Regeneration Rate
|-
|-
|'''Scope:''' Humans
|'''Scope:''' Everyone
|-
|-
|'''Description:''' Anyone who's been searching for ammunition knows the situation - multiple guns with one or two bullets in each, and a few spare clips/shells. In theory, you should be able to reload all your weapons, but due to the way the bullets are distributed amongst them, you can't. Ballistics Training would be a Military class skill, to reflect the real-life practice of manually loading a magazine. Acquiring the skill would add a button to the interface on the game (alongside the 'barricade', 'enter/exit' type action buttons) reading "Sort ammunition". Using this button would cost 1 AP per partially-loaded pistol, and would reshuffle the ammunition in your guns so that it fills as many as possible, leaving only one (or none) partially-loaded. For example, having six pistols with two bullets in each would mean the "Sort ammunition" button would leave you with 6 less AP, two fully loaded pistols and four empty ones. It'd be a life-saver for people who tend to stock up on ammunition one day with the intent of going shooting with full AP another day, and would also lessen encumbrance for those who do so. Due to the low-capacity nature of shotguns, this would only affect pistols. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}}
|'''Description:''' Due to the passage of time with mobile games and other real time action games without restriction, I think that we should address the action points system of the game. This game can only realistically be played for 5 minutes a day. So it's not really a seller for new blood. If we want to see this game survive it needs to evolve into something more exciting than 5 minutes. My suggestion is double the regeneration rate to improve activity. I love this game.  I want to play it more. And the die hard fans I'm sure feel the same. More will go on in a day, sure. But that's for both sides. We're ready for it. Let's get this game moving again. We need this.
|}
|}
====Discussion (Ballistics Training)====
====Discussion (Action Points)====
This sounds pretty good.  How would it work if you had a mix of shotguns and pistols?  Would the shotguns be loaded as well?  Also, is there an option to only sort some of your ammo if you want to ration your AP or is it an all or nothing proposition?--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 15:25, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:It says no shotguns, and I'd wager that there's no way to do some. All or nothing.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 15:29, 19 September 2009 (BST)
 
[[PR_Weapon#Redistribute_Ammunition]] --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:31, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:That was way back in 2005 but it is still a good idea... I actually think this version is better. The higher AP cost and the not working for shotguns make it a lot more balanced given how useful it would be not having so many half loaded pistols. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 17:38, 19 September 2009 (BST)
::Yes, the AP cost was a consideration. Basically, I see the only efficient uses for it to be stocking up before leaving for a while, so the AP cost is negated by the whole "stock up now, spree in a few days" mentality; or when encumbrance is getting to be a serious concern which is deemed worthy of spending half a dozen AP to ease. It's a streamlined, narrower and more balanced version of the earlier idea. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 18:23, 19 September 2009 (BST)
 
I'm still wondering why Kevan hasn't implemented a system like Jorm used for NW, where you could unload weapons and create individual bullets.  When you had enough bullets, they automatically became a new clip.  Shotguns would work in basically the same way, only you can unload them now.  There really isn't anything to change in that regard, since each shell is loaded individually. [[User:RinKou|RinKou]] 19:32, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:Complexity, server load and the fact that weapons aren't exactly rare in UD like they are in NW. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 19:45, 19 September 2009 (BST)
----
----


===Making UD Available on Facebook===
===Drone===
{|
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Chronocalamity|Chronocalamity]] 09:35, 19 September 2009 (BST)
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Rosslessness|<span style="color: MidnightBlue ">R</span><span style="color: Navy">o</span><span style="color: DarkBlue">s</span><span style="color: MediumBlue">s</span><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span>]][[User_Talk:Rosslessness|<span style="color: RoyalBlue">l</span><span style="color: CornflowerBlue">e</span><span style="color: SkyBlue">s</span><span style="color: LightskyBlue">s</span>]][[User_Talk:Rosslessness/Quiz|<span style="color: LightBlue">n</span><span style="color: PowderBlue">e</span>]][[Monroeville Many|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]][[The Great Suburb Group Massacre|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]]<sup>[[Location Page Building Toolkit|<span style="color: DarkRed">Want a Location Image?]] </span> </sup>  19:10, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
|-
|-
|'''Type:''' Added Community
|'''Type:''' Survivor Item
|-
|-
|'''Scope:''' All Players and Protental New Players
|'''Scope:''' Survivors
|-
|-
|'''Description:''' This idea is most likely the biggest bit of nonsense you will ever hear but hear me out.There is alot of people that use community sites like facebook and myspace just for the games and right now facebook does not have any zombie genre app that could ever rival UD. If UD as made avalible on Facebook I have no doubt that Its player base would expand to new great numbers.
|'''Description:''' Portable drone, found in mall tech stores, which are pointless as we all know. Encumbrance is 10%. When activated for 15ap they provide an image of a 10x10 grid centred on the survivor, showing the current outside status of all blocks including zombies, survivors and dead bodies. Like DNA scanners, Drones are multi use.
 
Player Expansion is not the only thing that can be gained here, with added support for facebooks gifting and recruitment system all players could build real traceable Clans/Groups and protental bonuses could be implicated. A example bonus could be if you were fighting with clan mates (Zombie or Survivor) then you and your mate would get some sort of hit rating/exp/loot bonus. Lets face it, in real life it is much more easier to do something with help.
|}
|}
====Discussion (Making UD Available on Facebook)====
====Discussion (Drone)====
Is not having an organised team of people who can revive you, finish off that final zombie or barricade your suicide repair enough of a bonus? Why unbalance the game with perks? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:20, 19 September 2009 (BST)
Would there be a message displayed to the players to the effect of "there's a drone buzzing overhead", similar to a flare? --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 02:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 
No. Here's why:
*Doing this will make it seem like the only way to get things done is by having both a UD character and a facebook page.
*This will nerf PKers, as you'll be able to track all their alts using facebook. Even their helpful ones.
*It could hurt zergers, but only the stupid ones.
*We'll get every stupid Tom, Dick and ZombieKisser255990 from facebook playing at the same time, which may cause the server to have a heart attack.
*It's unfair to people who don't have facebook.
*Metagaming provides most of those benefits anyway.
*That's what this here wiki's for.
*I hate facebook. Really.
 
Pick any of those reasons. They all apply. --{{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 12:04, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:I'm going to ignore the section on 'perks' because that's just dumb and a dupe of various horde/leader suggestions. However those reasons you put up are just dumb, behold:
:#How is this different to IRC or forums now? I can get lots of things done solo, it just takes some basic thought.
:#How is this any different to IRC, the forums or the wiki now? Hell, I can ask most PKers where their characters are and they'll tell me, this argument is nonsensical.
:#You don't get to reject things based on server load, go back and read the basic documents at the top of the page.
:#How is it unfair? How is different to MOB using IRC against one solo survivor in a building?
:#People shouldn't have to meta game. If you want to play a game where you need to be in a meta to get even the smallest thing done, fuck off to Nexus War, the basic premise of this game is you versus the apocalypse.
:#The wiki's to provide a resource, not to co-ordinate, hang out or to inform people of how your night out went.
:#So do I, but what does that have to do with this debate?
 
:'''There is nothing wrong with the idea of creating an official portal from Facebook to this game''', the only problem with this suggestion is the perks section, which is dumb.
 
:Think for a second, we get more people playing, different people playing, an easier method of communicating between people who don't want to or can't use IRC and did I mention more fucking people?
 
:Facebook (as well as all the other similar sites) is most people's introduction to the internet now-a-days, making it easy for these people (I know grandparents on Facebook) to join the game is a good thing. I fucking hate Myspazz and Facesitter, but that doesn't change the fact that this could be highly beneficial to the game. Get over your prejudice before you rant on this page again with an army of straw men. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 19:27, 19 September 2009 (BST)
 
I have a Facebook account, but there is no way I would even begin to go for something like this.  I like to keep my personal life just like that.  I don't need people from another clan/group that I may not like finding me on there and then giving me problems on there too.  I already have enough real life issues to deal with without having to hear from people I may or may not like. --{{User:Dark Blue Helmet/Sig}} 12:11, 19 September 2009 (BST)
 
Also a semi-dupe. It came up on DS a month or so ago, and was destroyed in flames.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 15:00, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:There's nothing wrong with giving people a facebook option to play urbad dead for those who will use the option.  But it shouldn't come with any bonuses.  The game is bonus enough.  And if you don't want people stalking you through facebook don't link your account to the game.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 15:28, 19 September 2009 (BST)
 
#As Yonnua. This is suggested a lot and never passes DS.
#Kevan's had a facebook for two years, and that's as long as ''I've'' known him. The thought would have crossed his mind before. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 17:13, 19 September 2009 (BST)
 
You know; I don't think I have ever seen any mention of a "face Book" version.... I think it would actually be a good idea if it were possible though as a hell of a lot of people do use face book just for games. I agree with Giles about not gaining any bonus's though. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 17:43, 19 September 2009 (BST)
 
{{User:Lelouch/Secret Research Submarine/Launch Bay/Bay Three|18:03, 19 September 2009 (BST)}}
 
The problem with Facebook app games is that they all encourage massive invites in exchange for arguably unfair advantages.  The developers want more players so they can increase their chances of donations (which, in this case, also gives arguably unfair advantages).  UD has always been a game where no player has a real definite edge over another (which is also something of a downside, since there's no class rock paper scissors since everybody's basically exactly the same after level 20).  An interesting thought, but ultimately, one that just wouldn't work with this game.  A new one, though, probably.  Just be sure to make it so that people who have no qualms adding 5000 people to their Facebook account dominate the game. [[User:RinKou|RinKou]] 19:29, 19 September 2009 (BST)
----
----


===Explosives v2.0===
===Backpack===
{|
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 21:50, 18 September 2009 (BST)
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Wild Crazy|Wild Crazy]] ([[User talk:Wild Crazy|talk]]) 20:55, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
|-
|-
|'''Type:''' New Weapon
|'''Type:''' New item
|-
|-
|'''Scope:''' Survivors
|'''Scope:''' Survivors
|-
|-
|'''Description:'''
|'''Description:''' This will be a new item found in schools with a 2% find rate and sports stores with a 4% find rate. The low numbers are because, like a flak jacket, once you find it you have it forever. It increases you encumbrance by 30%. However, you can't use an item that is in your backpack until you remove it from the backpack. It costs one AP to add an item to your backpack and one AP to remove an item. An item affects your regular encumbrance until added to the backpack. Items such as GPS, radios, cell phones, and flak jacket do not work when in your backpack. Items in your backpack will not be shown in your inventory, but the backpack itself will be shown in your inventory. There will be a drop box next to the word backpack that shows all the items inside. When you click on an item in that drop box, it removes it from your backpack (1 AP).
There would be a new type of weapons, Explosives. Explosives attack the target at 25% accuracy, and then go down the target stack (zombie stack if the target is zombie, etc.), attacking at 20% accuracy until the number of zombies attacked = the area-of-effect, or the stack is finished. There is also a 20% chance that the explosive will fail, attacking the wrong stack. You only get XP from the original target.
 
Flak jackets also affect explosives.


*Molotov Cocktail (encumbrance 2%): any survivor can build Molotov Cocktails out of Fuel Cans and Beer/Wine bottles for 1 AP (Button: "Create Molotov with (drop down menu)". The options on the drop down meun are "Fuel Can & Wine" and "Fuel Can & Beer"), and throw it for another AP. Damage: 4. Area-of-effect: 5.
*Grenade (encumbrance 7%, ''[[Building Types|Locations]]: Police Depts (~1%), Armoury (3%)''): Damage: 6. Area-of-effect: 5.


'''Science Skills'''
Q: Wouldn't this buff survivors, since they can carry more bullets and kill more zombies?
*Chemistry - reduces failure chances to 10%
**Advanced Chemistry - reduces failure chances to 5%.
'''Military Skills'''
*Explosives Training - increases accuracy by +15%.


'''Differences from last time'''
A: Since it costs an AP to add and remove an item, it wastes a lot of AP to put bullet clips in your backpack if you are planning on using them right away.
#More balanced
#More original
#No shooting through cades
#No survivor ransack
#More accurate for real life
|}
====Discussion (Explosives v2.0)====
Two notes: One, it relies on an unimplemented suggestion (your Fire), and it's still an AoE. Almost certainly not going to pass voting because of those two things. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 22:11, 18 September 2009 (BST)
:The unimplemented suggestion was a mistake. I forgot I was writing for DevSug, and started writing for my New City. --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 00:31, 19 September 2009 (BST)


''"More accurate for real life"'' - Police stations carry a stock of fragmentation grenades now do they? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 22:14, 18 September 2009 (BST)
:I'm not expert, but what about SWAT teams? --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 00:31, 19 September 2009 (BST)
::Obviously not an expert.  Because no, they don't.  A fragmentation grenade is an anti-personel grenade intend to cause as much damage (to personnel) as possible.  Why the hell would cops have them?--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 04:18, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:::Frags aren't the only type of grenade. --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 14:49, 19 September 2009 (BST)
::::You want grenades that do more damage than a point blank pistol round. Please feel free to tell me which type of grenades apart from fragmentation do this kind of damage ''and'' are commonly found in SWAT units. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 19:30, 19 September 2009 (BST)


I think that something like this would be to powerful for humans. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 01:49, 19 September 2009 (BST)
Q: If it wastes AP, what is the point?
:Suggest how to power it down. --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 02:45, 19 September 2009 (BST)
::I believe that being able to attack 10 zeds at once for 5 HP a peice is a little over the top. Massive attacks like this, or suggesting Machine Guns for example,... generally are dupes. One shouldn't have a broad spectrum attack. Should be individual attacks. At that, if you were going to attack several zeds at once, why do it with a molitov cocktail in the middle of the streets. I could understand it if they were all in a building,... but then it wouldn't affect ruined buildings... and then this goes back to the whole fire idea, and burning buildings.... basically,... your attacking way to much at one time. Try something like a flamethrower, where you attack one individual zed,... for like 5 HP a hit, with 40% chance to hit. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 02:54, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:::There's no "Fire" involved. I removed that part. --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 19:01, 19 September 2009 (BST)


A little reminder:[[Suggestions_Dos_and_Do_Nots#Multiply_It_By_A_Billion|Multiply It By A Billion]]. There's no way an AoE suggestion can be balanced--{{User:OrangeGaf/Sig}} 03:01, 19 September 2009 (BST)
A: It will be useful if you want to carry around an extra stash of items, such as FAKs and Revivification Syringes, or if you are going far away from any resource buildings and need some extra supplies.
:It's got a limited area of effect. --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 14:49, 19 September 2009 (BST)
::"Limited" does not equal balanced. One survivor throws a molotov to ten zombies. -5HP for each zombie, <big><big><big>'''+50XP'''</big></big></big> for the survivor. Does that look balanced to you?--{{User:OrangeGaf/Sig}} 17:28, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:::Changed it. Only 5 zombies, you only get the XP from the first one, and less damage done. --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 19:01, 19 September 2009 (BST)


'''Same as last time''' Muli-Suggestion.  Have you EVER suggested just ONE thing?--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 04:14, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:These are all part of the same idea. If I suggest everything seperate, I'm linking suggestions. Damned if I do, damned if I don't. --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 14:49, 19 September 2009 (BST)


So explosives are intelligent enough to discriminate between a zombie and a survivor?  Wow.  Why don't we have weapons like that now?  And, as last time, '''why doyou need a skill to make a molotov'''?  And those are some pretty bulky grenades.--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 04:24, 19 September 2009 (BST)
Please give your thoughts.
:*"So explosives are intelligent enough to discriminate between a zombie and a survivor?  Wow.  Why don't we have weapons like that now?" - No, but the user is (hopefully) smart enough to throw that Molotov at the group of zombies rather than the group of humans.
:*"And, as last time, '''why doyou need a skill to make a molotov'''?" Fixed that.
:*"And those are some pretty bulky grenades" For the sake of balance, do you really want some carrying around over 5 grenades?
::--{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 14:49, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:::This isn't like your prom, with the two 'sides' on opposite sides of the room never getting close to each other. Also, since when does 'smartness' have anything to do with targeting? I know lots of death cultists more intelligent than most players, and they'll be wiping out mall corners with this. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 19:33, 19 September 2009 (BST)


There's [[On Strike| a reason]] it's 10AP.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 15:09, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:Nah overpowered.  Think about the grand total of damage that a grenade would do.  That's too much damage.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 15:31, 19 September 2009 (BST)
::Changed it. --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 19:01, 19 September 2009 (BST)
{{User:Lelouch/Secret Research Submarine/Launch Bay/Bay Three|19:10, 19 September 2009 (BST)|Absolute, overpowered, irreparable, fail.}}
----
===Injured Zombie Revival===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' {{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 11:25, 17 September 2009 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' Gamplay adjustment
|-
|'''Scope:''' Survivors, zeds
|-
|'''Description:''' As it is, zombies always take 10AP to revive with a syringe. With this suggestion, I propose that it be changed to X AP, where X is the zombie's current health, up to a maximum of 10 AP.
This probably won't affect revive ques that much, but it will encourage zombies to feed on humans, lest they get revived during sieges.
|}
|}
====Discussion (Injured Zombie Revival)====
====Discussion (Backpack)====
So taking a zombie all the way down to 10 HP leaves a full revive cost? At that point, it's more efficient to ''kinfe'' the sucker to death... I'm not saying I support this suggestion, but it's still pretty weak at the moment.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 13:30, 17 September 2009 (BST)
 
This won't do a whole lot, usually when (smart) players get a zombie down to under that threshold, they're going to kill them anyway. Not only that, but you're still going to get situations where player A does 50 points worth of damage to a zombie and then player B comes along and wastes all their effort with a revive. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 15:41, 17 September 2009 (BST)
 
Mechanics dictate tactics, not vice versa. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 15:54, 17 September 2009 (BST)
 
If you were going to combat revive a zombie why would you damage it first? The combat revive is the cheapest way to remove a zombie from a building (Assuming a good scan routine and lack of brain rot) --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:58, 17 September 2009 (BST)
 
I think everybody has pretty much stated all the reasons why this is a [dumb] idea.  Most survivors are either going to CR (in which case they don't care how much HP the zombie has), or they will note that the zombie's health is low enough to just kill it and save the needle.  While Iscariot make a valid point in that implementation of a mechanic like this could lead to new survivor tactics--like the dedicated medic of a group being able to use more than 5 needles in a day--I think overall this idea won't pass in voting. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 09:27, 18 September 2009 (BST)
 
Wait your saying I can't revive a zombie if has 11 or more HP?  And you don't think this will "effect revive ques that much"?--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 04:11, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:No, you can still revive zombies at 10HP or more at the regular 10AP cost. I'm just saying that if they're down to 9HP or less, the AP revive cost is their HP, e.g. 5AP to revive a 5HP zombie, etc. However, given the feedback, I'm thinking that perhaps having it so that for every 5HP the zombie has lost, the revive cost goes down by 1AP. 45-40HP - 9AP revive cost, 40-35HP - 8AP cost etc.  --{{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 07:40, 19 September 2009 (BST)
::Much better. --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 14:54, 19 September 2009 (BST)
:::Like combat reviving isn't already ridiculously stronger than any other method of zombie-removal? Why are we buffing CRs, and what's to stop Mrh? cows from mauling each other to 5 HP and getting 10 revives for the AP cost of one?{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 19:12, 19 September 2009 (BST)
----
----
===Voluntary Character Deletion===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Necrofeelinya|Necrofeelinya]] 16:53, 16 September 2009 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' Okay, I typed here.  Now what?
|-
|'''Scope:''' All players
|-
|'''Description:''' "Obviously I can make new characters for the future and to complete the piece I wanted to do, however it has cost me character name that I quite liked, and I the owner apparently get no say over this. Unlike Nexus War I can't delete this guy and then have the same name again."
Iscariot brought up a valid point, if not the one he was making a suggestion about.  Some players might want to reuse names, or just accumulate too many characters they won't use again.  Why not implement a voluntary character self-delete feature so players can reuse character names and rid the database of old characters they won't be using anymore?  It'd be a button on the settings page, not the regular player action interface, and if you pressed it you'd get two warnings, each very explicit, telling you you're about to delete your character and what the ramifications are.  If you proceed with character deletion, the character is erased and you're forwarded to the UD main page.  It's not necessarily a crucial feature, as I assume abandoned characters are regularly deleted anyway, but it might be convenient for instances where players are attached to a particular name and want to switch cities or just start over with it.
|}
====Discussion (Voluntary Character Deletion)====
It took you longer to type that than it did for me to find [[Suggestion:20070613_Manual_Character_Deletion|this]]. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 16:57, 16 September 2009 (BST)
:There is also [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Suggestion:20070822_Escape/deletion this], [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Suggestion:20070914_Get_out_of_Malton_-_delete_character_-_2_endings_per_character_class this] and [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Suggestions/19th-Jan-2006#Character_Deletion_.28I_know.2C_I_read_the_FAQ_but_read_on.29 this].--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 04:47, 17 September 2009 (BST)
So, my PKer who's KOS on the rogues gallery decides to delete himself. User B comes along, and enters my PKer's name for their name. My character has been deleted, so they can use it. They're walking around Malton, and are continually attacked by Bounty Hunters, for no real reason. --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 16:58, 16 September 2009 (BST)
:If the RG then proceed to make allowances for this, my PKer who's KOS can now delete himself, and start a new account, with no Bounty. Flawed, as all character deletion.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 16:58, 16 September 2009 (BST)
::Just note that bounty hunting is an external system. But you are of course right that character relations could become rather confusing if this were implemented. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 21:04, 16 September 2009 (BST)
:::So it shouldn't be considered? It's an integral part of the game, so should be considered with all relevant suggestions.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 15:46, 17 September 2009 (BST)
::::It's not an integral part of the game at all, one could play this game for years and have nothing to do with it. What it is is a database that originated and is still controlled by a group with questionable alt policies who run add-ons universally denounced as cheating devices. Why should we be considering the RG again? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 15:57, 17 September 2009 (BST)
:::::I'm referring to Bounty Hunting as a whole, not just the RG. Playing Urbandead, unless as a dedicated zombie who is never alive, and rarely metagames, will result in you encountering Bounty Hunters at some point.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 16:08, 17 September 2009 (BST)
::::::What you're referring to is kill lists, let's not try and obfuscate that with political language. Kill lists are a player invention, like revive points. Neither should dictate the game updates in any way. I point you, somewhat reluctantly, to Nexus War. There you can delete and recreate characters and there doesn't seem to be any major problem with 'misidentification'. The staggering coincidence that would have to happen, I pick a name, mass up hundreds of kills on the name, delete ''and then'' a newbie has to create a character with the exact same name? You're more likely to win the lottery.
::::::Your notion that 'the bad people' will delete their characters in order to escape 'justice' is a straw man. What do you think they do now? People who don't want RG bounties are free to create new characters to replace old ones because it's a player invented system that Kevan, and the rules, couldn't care less about. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 16:17, 17 September 2009 (BST)
:::::::I agree with your argument about them just creating new characters. But on your other points, I'll have to disagree. Firstly, I don't see PKers as an unfair or "Bad" class. I actually play predominantly PKer (In the sense that my main alt used to be a PKer, and my secondary alt is a PKer.) Anyway, say this gets implemented. I then get my character, 'Roger Federer', to commit several horrific murders in and around the stadiums. I delete the account. A few months later, around the time of Wimbledon or another grand slam, a player thinks that getting Roger Federer as a RP alt would be fun. They get him a tennis racket, and head over to one of the stadiums, to find that they are immediately killed by bounty hunters. Finally, I'd say that Metagame things are always considered in game changes, e.g. Kevan boosting syringe search rates because of the Dead, or nerfing syringes because of On Strike.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 16:36, 17 September 2009 (BST)
::::::::You are of course forgetting the wonderful piece of information on everyone's profile, 'Created on'. The newbie's would be different to yours, thus giving him a straight alibi to any of the 'crimes' committed before that date. The Dead situation wasn't a meta thing at all, it was the ingame reduction in survivor numbers that did it, not the fact that a new group had shown up wanting to break the game. One does not equal the other. You'd be surprised at the number of experienced players who ''always'' have a new character on the go. Most do it for the fun of the challenge of starting from scratch, those characters then get loaded up with supplies, taken to certain places in Malton and idled. You know, in case someone starts a new group we want to join. Given that it's not against the game rules, new host bodies are more likely than [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=738142 you] [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1344779 think].... -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 16:44, 17 September 2009 (BST)
:::::::::I agree completely in that aspect. But do you really think that the typical bounty hunter's going to check the profile of someone they've heard is a PKer?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 18:30, 17 September 2009 (BST)
::::::::::Your typical reviver might not scan before reviving, should we remove Brain Rot? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:10, 18 September 2009 (BST)
:::::::::::No, because if they don't scan, that hurts ''them''. If this is implemented and a bounty hunter doesn't check the profile, it hurts ''The other person''. If there are problems to be gained from not checking, they should always be at the expense of the party that doesn't check.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 07:18, 18 September 2009 (BST)
::::::::::::It hurts a player because another player is working off.... a kill list, we're right back to the whole point that kill lists don't not, will not and should not even enter the equation with updates. Also, by not checking the list first, you are harming yourself, come shoot my death cultist some time to find out why. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 09:07, 18 September 2009 (BST)
:::::::::::::There is '''No''' reason why Kill lists shouldn't be considered when making suggestions. They are something which make up essentially the basis of the game for the two smaller survivor factions; PKers and Bounty hunters, and should therefore be considered in the process. What's more, it isn't just BHers and PKers who use kill lists. Zombies use them two. And anti-Zombie groups do. Most groups use kill lists. It's just another slice of the cake.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 13:28, 18 September 2009 (BST)
::::::::::::::Zombies use them? Who? What? When? Zombies use kill lists? Yeah, because there are people that zombies ''shouldn't'' be killing.... The fact is only a small proportion of the game uses them, survivors generally don't kill other because they're surviving, zombies kill anything they want, death cultists and PKers don't give a damn whether you have a record or not, if they want to kill you, they will. The only people that do care about these things are bounty hunters. The game updates are not being dictated to by meta tools and certainly not by one used only by a minority of the game's population. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 22:26, 18 September 2009 (BST)
It doesn't matter; it's a dupe, people.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 18:47, 17 September 2009 (BST)
:I got escalated for taking that view to its logical conclusion. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 05:10, 18 September 2009 (BST)
:Dupe or not doesn't mean it can't or shouldn't be discussed.  Dupes are abused enough as it is.--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 04:01, 19 September 2009 (BST)
The ONLY benefit is being able to reuse a name.  Is that really a significant enough "benefit"?  All the bounty hunter/PKer/kill list stuff IS relevant.  After all if I see an target named "Bob" am I REALLY going to waste time checking their profile to see if is is the "Bob" I'm looking for when this IS the only ONE Bob?  Bob is going to get whacked for being named "Bob".  That having been said, the basic argument is more that there, apprantly, aren't enough names to go around.  Other than that, who is it going to benefit to get to "reuse" a name?  At best, I don't think a player should be allowed to delete the character they created.  However, if a character hasn't been played in like 4 months, maybe.--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 04:08, 19 September 2009 (BST)
----
===Blam, blam! Gunshot.===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Bucz|-- Bucz]] 11:39, 11 September 2009 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' Loud!
|-
|'''Scope:''' Z&H
|-
|'''Description:''' We do not have silenced weapons so... Why not implement a gunshot sound? When someone shots, it can be heard in radius of 4 clicks, for example. Silent when shot indoor. That would attract zombies and could inform survivors that something is happening. Still it does not dupe [[Flare#Flare_Gun|flares]] because the range is smaller. And using flare is a clear signal, gunshots would just indicate a battle. And would add some climate...
|}
====Discussion (Blam, blam! Gunshot.)====
This idea is like soviet communism: it ''looks great on paper'', but doesn't play well in reality. If you implimented this, people who had been away for 24/h would log in to see '''every''' shot fired within four blocks; too much screen spam.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 13:33, 11 September 2009 (BST)
:True, therefore it could be made in less ''spamish'' way. For example, it woild just indicate: ''You hear gunshots in the north. You hear gunshots in the north east.'' it is difficult to identify exact position of a gunshot, though. Descriptions ''and again ... and again... '' would not apply to it. So, maximum amount of messages that you would receive is 8, in case there is a big gunfight around. And if so, it is sensible that you hear it and can react. Sounds better? [[User:Bucz|-- Bucz]] 18:34, 11 September 2009 (BST)
::No, because that's just useless. Any time more than a single gun-based attack occurs (and often then), you'll probably have at least 8 shots going off. This means that if you log off for 24 hours and someone shoots azombie an hour after that, you'll have no way to hear any other shots for the next 23 hours. It's either spamtacular or useless, since gunshots are usually found huge amounts, or not at all.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 18:45, 11 September 2009 (BST)
Well there is [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Suggestion:20070627_gunshots this] in Peer Rejected.--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 02:55, 12 September 2009 (BST)  Also [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Suggestions/9th-Apr-2006#Echoes_of_Gunfire this].--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 03:04, 12 September 2009 (BST)
See, this would make sense in a normal, zombie-free suburb.  Of course you'd hear the gunshots.  But when you take into account that Malton really is a warzone, gunshots wouldn't at all be out of the norm.  Hell, it'd probably be more alarming to not hear gunshots, if anything.  But, thanks for the thought.  [[User:RinKou|RinKou]] 06:36, 12 September 2009 (BST)
Hey bucz, do you mind if I take this revise it a bit then give it back to you? I have a few ideas for it, and I really do like what it says but Rinkou makes an excellent point. -[[User:Devorac|Devorac]] 20:42, 16 September 2009 (BST)
Currently the only sound mechanic we have is feeding groan, in its current form you can only hear that outside, so why would gunshots be audible inside? They may be louder, but surely in a city as gun heavy as malton most survivors have long since tuned them out?  --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 16:01, 17 September 2009 (BST)
:...helicopters? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 16:03, 17 September 2009 (BST)
::You see? This is what I'm talking about. People on DS who actually know game mechanics. Helicopters. Although presumably they'd drown out the gunfire. Kevan and his inconsistent nonsense. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:00, 18 September 2009 (BST)
:::Helicopters are the loudest thing in the game, they can be heard indoors through barricades, groans can't. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 09:03, 18 September 2009 (BST)
::::Talking of which, if i feeding groan inside a building, other zombies get the message (...nearby) IF im inside a building and someone groans directly outside do I get the message? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:08, 18 September 2009 (BST)
:::::I'd reckon not, but a test may be in order. I have a spare zombie down near Fort Feral. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 22:30, 18 September 2009 (BST)
----
===Sweet dreams...===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Bucz|-- Bucz]] 10:55, 11 September 2009 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' Flavour
|-
|'''Scope:''' Human, maybe Zombies
|-
|'''Description:''' When you log in after more than 12 hours, It might happen that your character has fallen asleep. So when you log in, in the description you sometimes could get a random message like: You were dreaming that you were a zombie, You were dreaming about a new shotgun, You were dreaming about cherry pudding... 200 random short messages, that would be crated by wiki users on some "dream suggestion page" how about it?
|}
====Discussion (Sweet dreams...)====
Just to start the discussion... what a ''marvellous'' idea! Bravo me! [[User:Bucz|-- Bucz]] 18:40, 11 September 2009 (BST)
:I think it's a dupe, can anyone back this up?{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 18:46, 11 September 2009 (BST)
Actually, characters fall asleep when they run out of AP.--{{User:OrangeGaf/Sig}} 19:03, 11 September 2009 (BST)
:Exactly, the point is to add the dream description from time to time. The conditions, 12h as I said, or 0 AP as Orange says, and what sounds good for me, might be discussed later. [[User:Bucz|-- Bucz]] 01:02, 12 September 2009 (BST)
Text Spam.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 10:36, 12 September 2009 (BST)
Assuming for a moment that this is not a humorous suggestion, you would probably want to put a little tick box that would allow a player to turn this off. Or something. --[[User:Uberursa | Uberursa]]<sup>this bear wants honey</sup> 16:08, 12 September 2009 (BST)
Flavour is good. I propose the chance of it happening be small though (2% per night maybe) and the number of dreams be very large, so as not to begin to irritate players with the repetitive messages. The option to turrn it off might be good as well. Maybe a random windfall of 10XP to go along with some dreams? Though that will probably annoy someone somewhere. --[[User:Anotherpongo|Anotherpongo]] 14:40, 13 September 2009 (BST)
:Sleeping should not teach you how to leap between buildings or diagnose medical injuries.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 15:12, 13 September 2009 (BST)
:: "You dream you are standing in sort of sun-god robes on top of a pyramid while thousands of screaming naked women throw little pickles at you. You gain 10XP"! Funny, but really now... Lelouch is right, You can't learn how to do surgery by dreaming. Other than that I think it would be cool, I'm all in favor of flavor.-[[User:Devorac|Devorac]] 17:14, 13 September 2009 (BST)
::: Yeah, well, killing zombies shouldn't teach you how to jump across buildings or learn surgery either, but it happens. Seriously, I'm in favor of this, it's not essential but its fun.--[[User:Johnny Yossarian|Johnny Yossarian]] 01:22, 15 September 2009 (BST)
::Amen. And LOL. --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 22:45, 13 September 2009 (BST)
I agree: a big dream nubmer and a small chance of having it. I agree with Lelouch about XP (no XP). [[User:Bucz|-- Bucz]] 20:22, 13 September 2009 (BST)
I don't think people are actually asleep.  He just needed something to say when you run out of AP.--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 05:04, 14 September 2009 (BST)
: Er... That makes zero sense. If survivors never slept then 85% of the survivor population would be having very serious side effects, you know hallucinations, blackouts, cerebral decay... Hey wait, maybe there never were zombies, maybe we are all just suffering from sleep deprivation! Everybody sleeps, it's what makes the 12 hour 24 AP cycle make sense. -- {{Unsigned|Devorac|15:47, 14 September 2009}}
::Serious side effects? What? Like being immune to fatal damage? [[:Image:NegativeAP.png|Blacking out for days at a time?]] That sort of thing? Try staying awake for four years, you'll develop similar abilities, I promise. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 01:57, 15 September 2009 (BST)
::WTF?  Sleeping is a '''given''' like eating and taking a shit.  My point was that he needed something simple to throw in rather than just saying "your out of ap, come back later".  Or did you REALLY think people are only active for 5-10 minutes out of every day?  I'd imagine that would be just as bad as your "side effects" for not sleeping.--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 02:55, 15 September 2009 (BST)
----
===Weather indicator===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Bucz|Bucz]] 20:17, 9 September 2009 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' Environment, Gameplay
|-
|'''Scope:''' H & Z
|-
|'''Description:''' A short text would be added to the description to the environment, like "The sun is shining", "Quite cold today", "Foggy". It would change once a day. A script would check a real weather in some place of the real (without zombies) world and set up a text upon the real weather there.
It would not affect a game itself, just would add some Role Play... Only if fog appears, in The City would appear also fog (that mechanism is already implemented).
Zombies are dead and cold, so they would not get indicators related to the temperature.
|}
====Discussion (Weather indicator)====
This same idea has been put forth before. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 20:28, 9 September 2009 (BST)
Nice flavour.--[[User:Maps|Maps]] 20:35, 9 September 2009 (BST)
:[[Suggestion:20070628_Weather|Yeah]], but it just never got around to being implemented. :c --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 21:16, 9 September 2009 (BST)
Not that difficult to implement it, though. At lest in the basic form. Just weather, without day/night stuff.-- [[User:Bucz|Bucz]] 23:05, 9 September 2009 (BST)
:With or without day/night, it'd be fairly easy, yeah. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 23:09, 9 September 2009 (BST)
Here http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/results.html?query=providence for example  it is all given almost ready to use. -- [[User:Bucz|Bucz]] 09:12, 10 September 2009 (BST)
If the '''AUTHOR''' is  interested, I have just made a simple tiny script that returns real weather descriptions based on the page that I have just sent. Exemplary descriptions:
Passing clouds, warm.
Passing clouds, cool.
Scattered clouds, chilly.
Scattered showers, cool.
Fog, mild. Passing clouds, cool.
Scattered clouds, refreshingly cool.
Broken clouds, warm.
Please contact in case you are interested. I would be delighted to help. [[User:Bucz|Bucz]] 18:28, 10 September 2009 (BST)
:[[Suggestions_Dos_and_Do_Nots#Arguing_for_Your_Suggestion]], bullet two. That said, putting it to a vote will probably get it duped. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 20:43, 10 September 2009 (BST)
Thanks for remembering the rules, no arguing, just suggesting that I can help : ) [[User:Bucz|-- Bucz]] 10:50, 11 September 2009 (BST)
:'''Modification:''' weather would affect the gameplay itself. If there is a ''fog'' - a fog in the game appears. if there is ''hot'' or ''extremely hot'', all the zombies infect by their bite. What do you think about it? [[User:Bucz|-- Bucz]] 19:13, 11 September 2009 (BST)
::Too game-breaking; weather should just be weather. We don't need wierd buffs or spontaneously appearing/disappearing infections because the sun is out somewhere...{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 19:20, 11 September 2009 (BST)
:::You don't want the weather to affect game play?  I'd imagine it would depend on the conditions, but be something minor.  "Very hot" days, for example, the scent skills could be "improved" by 1 square.--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 02:48, 12 September 2009 (BST)
::::Nobody needs spontaneous infections... at least he is not a zombie : ) Good idea with the scent. And the message indicating it: ''The smell of the bodies is unbearable'' or something like that. The point is that those special effects would appear from time to time, 10-20 days a year I suppose. Rules of the game wouldn't change drastically every day : ) [[User:Bucz|-- Bucz]] 10:16, 12 September 2009 (BST)
:::::Or maybe we shouldn't give weird nonsensical buffs?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 10:37, 12 September 2009 (BST)
:::::I'm not saying infections.  I just think we could come up with some minor weather effects.  I don't think a 1 square increase to the scent skills would be very significant.  The question is double.  What happens in the other weather conditions?  And what are the affects for zombies AND survivors?  A hot day may increase scent range, but what does it do for survivors?  Or even SHOULD it do anything for survivors?--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 21:32, 12 September 2009 (BST)
::::::No, because it shouldn't do anything for zombies.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 21:48, 12 September 2009 (BST)
:::::::So weather should NOT affect the game.  Gotcha.--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 05:42, 13 September 2009 (BST)
:Bucz, I'd like a copy of that script. Just post on my talk page. --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 22:13, 14 September 2009 (BST)
Does anyone actually read that shit after the first few times of playing? I would think most people log in, see if they are still alive, and then go do what they are going to do. --[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]'''  <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 22:55, 13 September 2009 (BST)
:That's the reason for including some kind of in game affect.--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 04:05, 14 September 2009 (BST)
If (big if) there was a thirst or hunger related game change then maybe hot weather makes hunger/thirst come faster, and cold weather makes it go slower. --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 22:11, 14 September 2009 (BST)
:[[Suggestions Dos and Do Nots#Writing New Suggestions|If there was a giant ice cream]] in the middle of Malton then maybe hot weather makes the ice cream melt faster, and cold weather makes it melt slower. If you are butthurt because no one likes your suggestions, don't connect them with other suggestions to get them passed. --{{User:OrangeGaf/Sig}} 22:32, 14 September 2009 (BST)
::Ja man, he be speakin' wisdom.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 23:30, 14 September 2009 (BST)
:::I'm not trying to get anything passed. I just wanted this to be on the record. --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 21:00, 18 September 2009 (BST)
::::Record? You do realise this page isn't archived? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 22:27, 18 September 2009 (BST)
:::::If this goes to voting it will be. --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 14:56, 19 September 2009 (BST)
----
===No AP log-in cost===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Bucz|Bucz]] 20:07, 9 September 2009 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' AP
|-
|'''Scope:''' Humans and Zombies
|-
|'''Description:''' First of all, I know that AP suggestions might be dropped quickly, but nevertheless I post It.
When you log in, you loose one AP. Try to log-in, log-out and ten log-in again. From time to time I would like to know if my character is still standing or if someone had replied to me without loosing 1AP. In case I would like to check it 4x daily, I loose 4AP.
Technically, it would be achieved just by adding AP = AP + 1 when logging (am I right?). Other thing is that the traffic would increase. If the server would be able to handle current refresh rate x 2 I think that it should not be any problem, in case that we assure somehow (suggestions?) that most of the people won't click refresh every 3 seconds.
|}
====Discussion (No AP log-in cost)====
No you don't lose an AP from logging in - if you are, something may be wrong with your browser, though I find even that suspect. The [[Hit Limit|IP hits]] limit already exists to control how much server bandwidth a player eats, and you can refresh by hitting the "graffiti" or "speak" button with no text entered into them. Failing that, there are some UI mods that add a refresh button, and failing that, just go to your profile and hit "back to the city." --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 20:11, 9 September 2009 (BST)
:?zoom.  Refresh button built in. ;) {{User:Rorybob/Sig}}08:00, 11 September 2009 (BST)
Dupe of in game. ;D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 15:55, 10 September 2009 (BST)
This has pretty much been answered, search for 'actions via question marks' and compare it to your log in code to find out what's going on. IP limit is different to AP and one is not dependant on the other. Personally I think certain things are wrong with the implementation of the IP limits, but that's a different gripe. To recheck your surroundings without performing an action or installing an add-on I recommend pressing Buy Skills and then Back To City. Just remember which character you're playing, I've almost bought Brain Rot with a few characters when I was half asleep at my computer. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 21:40, 12 September 2009 (BST)
----
===Trap Runner===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' {{User:Sorakairi/sig}} 23:05, 8 September 2009 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' Skill
|-
|'''Scope:''' Huamsn and Zombies
|-
|'''Description:''' For anyone who actually knows, I took the name from a great PS1 game. Anyway. This makes 2 new skills. Trap Runner, which is a sub-skill of Free Running, and Trapper, which can possibly be a Zombie Hunter skill or just a Military skill.
Trapper allows Humans to create different traps by using a combination of both Items in their Inventory and items found in the building, with different flavor depending on where you set your Trap e.g.  ''You set up an elaborate Fire Axe trap on the door. The next person to enter from the street will set it off''.  Or ''Taking your pistol, you set up a Trap to fire it at the next person who enters from the outside''. Whenever a Zombie enters through the door, their message would be something like A Human Trap is set off as you enter. You take X amount of damage. There is a 75% chance that the player entering the building will be affected by the trap. Not being affected would give you a message along the lines of As you enter the building, a Trap is set off. Fortunately, it is misaimed, and you aren’t hurt. This would use up the Trap, and there is only one Trap per building. Traps can only be set in certain buildings. I haven’t thought of which ones, so please suggest some. It would cost 10AP to set up a Trap.
Possible Traps include: A Fire Axe Trap – Does 3 Damage, Needs a Fire Axe. A Pistol Trap – Does 5 Damage, Needs a Pistol. Shotgun Trap – does 6 Damage, Needs a Shotgun. Mêlée Trap – does between 1 and 4 damage, Requires a  Mêlée Weapon.
In Short:
• 10 AP to create Trap.
• Useable only once, then destroyed.
• Only in Certain buildings.
• 75% Chance of working.
Trap Runner increases the chance of avoiding the Trap by 50% when entering by Free Running, and 25% when entering from the street. Avoiding the Trap when you have Trap Runner provides a message of ''Thanks to your battle hardened reflexes, you avoid the Trap set in the building''.
|}
====Discussion (Trap Runner)====
No auto-attacks that can do damage without warning. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 23:17, 8 September 2009 (BST)
It is also a dupe.--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 04:46, 9 September 2009 (BST)
Auto-attacks are a pretty big no, sorry.  Plus, survivors are pretty overpowered as it is, they don't really need another upgrade, so. [[User:RinKou|RinKou]] 07:45, 9 September 2009 (BST)
I hate item-combining suggestions. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 15:57, 10 September 2009 (BST)
This is a dupe of various trap suggestions, I've even seen Shotgun traps in my day. The problem is the nature of the beast, there are no NPCs in this game, there are no ways of taking damage (infection excepted) without doing it yourself or having another player in the same square as you and open to attack.
The other problem is the nature of targeting, just a guess, but I'm betting our suggester doesn't want this to hurt helpful, white hat wearing survivors. Inanimate lumps of metal don't differentiate between good and evil, light and dark and democrat and arsehole.
The major problem as regards the status quo is that it could force zombies to mega horde to gain a breach in certain buildings or risk being killed on entry and be removed by ?dump bots, I'm looking at certain malls and forts while I say this. Forcing players to exclusively work together or achieve nothing forces the game into a boring stasis, see Nexus War. UD is the champion of the feral and the lone survivor, suggestion shouldn't hurt them. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 21:47, 12 September 2009 (BST)
Oh god no! I'm gonna assume that only one trap can be rigged to a door otherwise this idea is even more silly.Auto attacks, NPC's are a big no no. -- [[User:Alex1guy|Alex1guy]]  10:19, 13 September 2009 (BST)
Anonymous Wikier, I really dont care if it hits a White Hat Survivor. In Fact I'd probably laugh at them. Iscariot, the trap is only activated by one enterer. And Alex, yes, just one trap to a door and one to...where ever you enter with Free Running. {{User:Sorakairi/sig}} 10:17, 17 September 2009 (BST)
----
===Slight gesture change===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 17:40, 7 September 2009 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' zombie
|-
|'''Scope:''' eh? whats the difference between type and scope again...
|-
|'''Description:''' Just a few slight changes to the UD flailing gesture taunts and such...
1. zombies can point at that dead corpse on the ground, doesn't seem like a big deal and I couldn't find it...
2. zombie can point a graffiti on the wall, also not a big deal but still has its usefullness
|}
====Discussion (Slight gesture change)====
I agree with this suggestion. Also, scope is who or what it effects, and type is flavour / skill, etc. For you, it would be flavour.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 17:50, 7 September 2009 (BST)
Why not? :-) --{{User:Brainguard/Sig}} 20:13, 7 September 2009 (BST)
Don't see any harm.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 00:37, 8 September 2009 (BST)
:Wait, can zombies point to a ''specific'' corpse? If so, that could affect anonymity...{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 00:38, 8 September 2009 (BST)
Graffiti part is a [[Suggestion:20071214 Gesture to Graffiti|dupe]]. --[[User:Midianian|Midianian]] 08:39, 8 September 2009 (BST)
I really haven't seen a zombie point at anything but the barricades, actually... Though, in any case, there isn't anything wrong with it.  Even if specific corpses could be pointed at.  No affect on anonymity, since they're not really zombies at that point.  Just corpses, heh.  [[User:RinKou|RinKou]] 07:47, 9 September 2009 (BST)
:I broke into an NT building and pointed at myself a lot (along with some Mrh? and such) to indicated I wanted a revive.  As for pointing at specfic corpses, if Bob is on my contact list, I can see him as a corpse, right?--[[User:Pesatyel|Pesatyel]] 09:07, 9 September 2009 (BST)
As zombies cannot even open doors, it would be hard for them to write something with sense. But, maybe they could just spray over existing graffiti erasing the old one and leaving unreadable gibberish? With 10% that they spray themselves instead of the wall... :) [[User:Bucz|Bucz]] 15:49, 10 September 2009 (BST)
:You didn't read the suggestion, did you? This has nothing to do with zombies creating graffiti, only being able to gesture towards it. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 15:53, 10 September 2009 (BST)
Zombies can point at corspes that are on their contact list, I'm pretty sure, and if they can't, who cares about zombie anonymity because they can already point at ''live'' zombies on their contact list. As for the better part of the suggestion (the graffiti), it's a shame it's a dupe, I would have liked to see it implemented. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|Chartreuse}}-- 15:59, 10 September 2009 (BST)
:More important than pointing at the graffiti would be Blood Smear for zombies.... -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 21:48, 12 September 2009 (BST)
::I think it would be hilarious if blood was implemented, and somehow turned the tide, so that zombies won the game permanantly. All that held them back was the inability to smear blood on walls...--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 07:20, 18 September 2009 (BST)
:::Blood has been implemented.... -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:47, 18 September 2009 (BST)
::::Blood smear has not.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 07:53, 18 September 2009 (BST)
----
===Mutually Exclusive Class System===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Harrison Htachet|Harrison Hatchet]] 15:03, 2 September 2009 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' Class Redesign
|-
|'''Scope:''' Future city in UD
|-
|'''Description:''' I have some ideas about redesigning the class system for a future UD city. My rationale is that classes as currently implemented become meaningless as you advance in levels. Every high-level character has all, or almost all, skills. Instead, classes should be specialized and interdependent. One character shouldn't be able to do everything. Below are some more details.
# All survivors would start as civilians.
# Most of what we now consider must-have skills would be classified as civilian (free running, basic hand-to-hand combat, basic firearms combat, diagnosis, construction).
# After the civilian has acquired some prerequisite number of civilian skills, he/she can choose to become either military or scientist and have access to the chosen class's skills.
# All zombie skills would be off limits, though there might be a Dual Nature class. A Dual Nature class would have a limit on total number of skills and have some distribution limit (e.g., maximum of 20 skills, with no more than 13 in either survivor or zombie skills).
# If you change your mind, you should be able to change classes, forget all skills of the old class, and get back some (not all) of your spent experience points.
|}
====Discussion (Mutually Exclusive Class System)====
Why? What problem does this solve, and what end does this serve other than breaking the game, deleting everyone's skills, and violating a crapload of the basic [[Suggestions Dos and Do Nots]]?{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 18:38, 2 September 2009 (BST)
It's also incredibly dupish, and completely nerfs survivors. To make this even reasonably fair, zombies would only be able to bite or claw. Otherwise, it's complete spam.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 18:42, 2 September 2009 (BST)
I can see what you're getting at here, and other games have implemented a similar system. However, the nature of the game rather dictates the current structure and the change really wouldn't work now that it's been around so long. In conclusion, it's not actually a bad idea but it would only really work if it was implemented at the start of the game. At this stage of the game, survivors would all be up in arms over losing their skills and it would never pass voting.--{{User:The General/sig}} 19:30, 2 September 2009 (BST)
I did say a future city, not Malton or the others. There are three cities, so there might be others in the future, right? So no one would lose skills, it would be this way at the start, etc. etc. Zombies could have classes too, though I don't have any concrete ideas. --[[User:Harrison Htachet|Harrison Hatchet]] 22:06, 2 September 2009 (BST)
:Both of the other cities were promotional. I'd wager that if they make a movie of Pride and prejudice... and zombies, then that will be made in to a city. Other than that, I don't see a need for more cities. Furthermore, it's just not that good an idea overall.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 22:13, 2 September 2009 (BST)
Yes to implementing this in another city. In Malton? No.--[[User:Maps|Maps]] 13:43, 3 September 2009 (BST)
:Agreed... on a side note, if you want to play like that, go play DND or [http://scrollwars.com scroll wars] --[[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 04:07, 5 September 2009 (BST)
Things similar to this are often discussed by people designing theoretical cities for UD, I know I did way back. Your problem is Malton is open beta, so you'd have to have a new city to test this in (similar to perma-death in MV and BHW) or a new game to try it in. I outlined something similar to a programmer I knew when we were considering something similar. It's never going to fly here though, this is about alterations to the current game, not whole new ones. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 21:53, 12 September 2009 (BST)
I would consider this interesting in a new city (especially given that Romero's got a new film in the pipeline...), but I don't see any need or desire for it in the Malton map. It's an interesting idea, but ultimately unwise for the main game. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 05:04, 18 September 2009 (BST)
----
==Suggestions up for voting==
===[[Suggestion:20090919 Filter racial slurs|Filter racial slurs]]===
This suggestion is now up for voting. Its discussion has been moved to its [[Suggestion talk:20090919 Filter racial slur|talk page]].
===[[Suggestion:20090909 Ripoff of Boxing Gloves, stolen from Dr Frank|Ripoff of Boxing Gloves, stolen from Dr Frank]]===
This suggestion is now up for voting. Its discussion has been moved to its [[Suggestion talk:20090909 Ripoff of Boxing Gloves, stolen from Dr Frank|talk page]].

Latest revision as of 17:27, 8 July 2024

NOTICE
The Suggestions system has been closed indefinitely and Developing Suggestions is no longer functions as a part of the suggestions process.

However, you are welcome to use this page for general discussion on suggestions.

Suggestion Navigation
Suggestion Portal
Current Suggestions • Suggestions up for Voting • Clothes Suggestions
Cycling Suggestions • Peer Reviewed • Undecided • Peer Rejected • Humorous
Suggestion Advice • Topics to Avoid and Why • Help, Developing and Editing

Developing Suggestions

This section is for general discussion of suggestions for the game Urban Dead.

It also includes the capacity to pitch suggestions for conversation and feedback.

Further Discussion

  • Discussion concerning this page takes place here.
  • Discussion concerning the suggestions system in general, including policies about it, takes place here.

Resources

How To Make a Discussion

Adding a New Discussion

To add a general discussion topic, please add a Tier 3 Header (===Example===) below, with your idea or proposal.


Adding a New Suggestion

  • Paste the copied text above the other suggestions, right under the heading.
  • Substitute the text in RED CAPITALS with the details of your suggestion.
  • The process is illustrated in this image.
{{subst:DevelopingSuggestion
|time=~~~~
|name=SUGGESTION NAME
|type=TYPE HERE
|scope=SCOPE HERE
|description=DESCRIPTION HERE
}}
  • Name - Give the suggestion a short but descriptive name.
  • Type is the nature of the suggestion, such as a new class, skill change, balance change.
  • Scope is who or what the suggestion affects. Typically survivors or zombies (or both), but occasionally Malton, the game interface or something else.
  • Description should be a full explanation of your suggestion. Include information like flavor text, search odds, hit percentages, etc, as appropriate. Unless you are as yet unsure of the exact details behind the suggestion, try not to leave out anything important. Check your spelling and grammar.

Cycling Suggestions

  • Suggestions with no new discussion in the past month may be cycled without notice.


Please add new discussions and suggestions to the top of the list


Ignore based on Radio Broadcast

Timestamp: Khwud (talk) 17:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Type: UI enhancement
Scope: Interface
Description: Allow 'ignore' from radio broadcasts; users are hiding behind their anonymity to allow them to broadcast things that would broadly trigger them to be ignored, if their user ID was visible. Adding their name, or an auto-generated call-sign (it is for a radio, after all) or something so that they could be blocked based on their broadcasts would help user experience. In addition, and broadcasts that get more than a threshold number could get tagged for review, and the user potentially having their (in-game) ham-license revoked.

Discussion (Ignore based on Radio Broadcast)

Shrink the map

Timestamp: --UroguyTMZ 16:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Type: Map change
Scope: Everyone
Description: There are just over 3000 active characters in the game currently likely counting a significant percentage of alts and zergs. Shrinking the map by eliminating the outer first two rings of suburbs would increase the amount of interactions between the remaining characters. This shrink could be increased or decreased depending on future changes to the playerbase.

Discussion (Shrink the map)

Action Points

Timestamp: User:Wolldog1 10:07, 26 July 26, 2022
Type: Action Points Increase Regeneration Rate
Scope: Everyone
Description: Due to the passage of time with mobile games and other real time action games without restriction, I think that we should address the action points system of the game. This game can only realistically be played for 5 minutes a day. So it's not really a seller for new blood. If we want to see this game survive it needs to evolve into something more exciting than 5 minutes. My suggestion is double the regeneration rate to improve activity. I love this game. I want to play it more. And the die hard fans I'm sure feel the same. More will go on in a day, sure. But that's for both sides. We're ready for it. Let's get this game moving again. We need this.

Discussion (Action Points)

Drone

Timestamp: RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 19:10, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Type: Survivor Item
Scope: Survivors
Description: Portable drone, found in mall tech stores, which are pointless as we all know. Encumbrance is 10%. When activated for 15ap they provide an image of a 10x10 grid centred on the survivor, showing the current outside status of all blocks including zombies, survivors and dead bodies. Like DNA scanners, Drones are multi use.

Discussion (Drone)

Would there be a message displayed to the players to the effect of "there's a drone buzzing overhead", similar to a flare? --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 02:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Backpack

Timestamp: Wild Crazy (talk) 20:55, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Type: New item
Scope: Survivors
Description: This will be a new item found in schools with a 2% find rate and sports stores with a 4% find rate. The low numbers are because, like a flak jacket, once you find it you have it forever. It increases you encumbrance by 30%. However, you can't use an item that is in your backpack until you remove it from the backpack. It costs one AP to add an item to your backpack and one AP to remove an item. An item affects your regular encumbrance until added to the backpack. Items such as GPS, radios, cell phones, and flak jacket do not work when in your backpack. Items in your backpack will not be shown in your inventory, but the backpack itself will be shown in your inventory. There will be a drop box next to the word backpack that shows all the items inside. When you click on an item in that drop box, it removes it from your backpack (1 AP).


Q: Wouldn't this buff survivors, since they can carry more bullets and kill more zombies?

A: Since it costs an AP to add and remove an item, it wastes a lot of AP to put bullet clips in your backpack if you are planning on using them right away.


Q: If it wastes AP, what is the point?

A: It will be useful if you want to carry around an extra stash of items, such as FAKs and Revivification Syringes, or if you are going far away from any resource buildings and need some extra supplies.


Please give your thoughts.

Discussion (Backpack)

Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=Developing_Suggestions&oldid=2433158"