Developing Suggestions: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Developing Suggestions Intro}}
<noinclude>{{Developing Suggestions Intro}}</noinclude>


==Suggestions==
<!--Put your new suggestion immediately under this line-->
<!--Put your new suggestion immediately under this line-->
===Zombie Hunter skill: Disembowel===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 12:31, 30 August 2010 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' New skill
|-
|'''Scope:''' Level 10+ survivors who can buy the skill, receiving zombies
|-
|'''Description:''' Ever wonder how can you still trigger a Headshot when you're using melee weapons like fire axes and knives? I guess if you keep at hitting the head hard enough you probably can do it, but that takes more effort and time than a simple bullet, and in a zombie apocalypse you won't have enough of the time part. I feel the flavor is a bit amiss with that.
So I've been thinking: what if there was a separate Zombie Hunter skill when you kill a zombie with those weapons? That is what the Disembowel skill is for.
:{{udspan|'''Disembowel''' - If the player delivers a killing blow to a zombie with a knife or fire axe, it stands up with 20 less HP from its maximum hit points.}}
It costs 100 XP, and since it's a [[Zombie Hunter]] skill it's only available for survivors level 10 and above. Besides that it has no other prerequisite. The flavor is that with the knife or fire axe, the Zombie Hunter would further mutilate the zombie's body and heavily damage the organs and muscles; being a Malton zombie it would still stand up after that, but with a weakened constitution than usual.
Headshot still works the same for all other melee weapons like the crowbar, but for the knife and fire axe Disembowel has a higher priority than Headshot. If the player has both Headshot and Disembowel skills when they kill a zombie with a knife or fire axe, then the receiving zombie would not be Headshot and stand up with 5 less AP; instead it would be Disemboweled and stand up with 20 less HP.
Some things to consider:
* 20 HP might be a relatively huge HP loss, but zombies with Digestion can recover it by feeding on dead corpses. To recover 20 HP it would take 5 AP of feeding, which is also the amount of AP lost with Headshot.
* Zombie players would feel benefitted by the new skill since there's a chance they will only lose 10/1 AP upon death instead of 15/6 AP, if the survivor chooses to finish them off with a Disembowel instead of a Headshot. This would also be advantageous to the survivor since the next time they kill a Disemboweled zombie it would have 20 less HP if it hasn't recovered them. This leads to higher XP gain for both sides, with the zombies having more daily AP to play with and the survivors achieving the kill XP bonus more easily.
* In siege situations this can either bolster or weaken the attacking zombie force, depending on the strategies used. If the zombies are experts on [[?rise]] then using Disembowel to repel them would be fruitless, as even if they rise with 20 less HP they still stand up for only 10/1 AP. On the other hand if the zombies employ the [[Beachhead Tactic]], on the long run the zombies might be worse off as they can be quickly evicted from the building with their significantly reduced hit points.
Personally at the start I don't believe Disembowel would change much in normal play since most trenchies would still choose to finish zombies with guns and therefore Headshot. But who knows, if many survivors would use it it could lead to new strategies being developed, not only for the survivor side but also from the zombies who adapt to it. Would it help out survivors or zombies more? Hell if I know, but it's something to think about.
|}
====Discussion (Zombie Hunter skill: Disembowel)====
It seems rather a useless skill overall. Zombies have very little regard for HP. Even a 20HP loss isn't much. I don't think too many people would get this skill, since headshot removes 5AP immediately, rather than a HP reduction, which MIGHT mean that the zed is easier to kill or will use 5 AP to recover, but that the zeds will most likely ignore.
However, the zombie users would definitely like it (I know I would!). I think the issue is that it's too underpowered for the survivors. Why get a skill which actually somewhat HELPS the enemy? {{User:Shadok/sig}} 13:27, 30 August 2010 (BST)
:I haven't really considered if it clearly favors either side, all I can tell Disembowel is a very situational skill. When HP deficiency on zombies would make the survivors gain an upper hand it's great, otherwise Headshot is the way to go. Some examples I could think of:
:* Recovering ruins: with at least a one third reduction in zombie hit points, the survivors spend a similar lesser amount of AP on cleaning up zombies from within ruins. This makes TRP salting harder, and the 5 AP they save is a small reward compared to losing territory to survivors.
:* Anti-griefing mechanism: some survivors still believe that Headshot's AP loss property is harsh on zombie players who are after all humans in real life. With Disembowel these players can still contribute in keeping down the zombie menace by picking this skill instead of (or in conjunction with) Headshot, rather than not picking up a Zombie Hunter skill at all. --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 14:09, 30 August 2010 (BST)


Uhm.. I like this, but there is [[Suggestion:20080916_Headshots_remove_HP,_not_AP|this]] suggestion that is very similar. It's written by you! :p - [[User:Whitehouse]] 14:19, 30 August 2010 (BST)
===Ignore based on Radio Broadcast===
:Yeah, it's inspired by that. :-) From that suggestion I figured Headshot has had too much controversy with it to be tweaked any further, so I remade the concept as a new Zombie Hunter skill.  --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 14:32, 30 August 2010 (BST)
 
You know, I've got so many bones to pick with this suggestion's format, but I actually like the core concept a lot. Either way it's a 5 AP drain on the undead, but this allows (high level) zombies to choose whether to pay it or not. The only players who are really inconvenienced by this, as I see it, are Combat Revivers, and I doubt anyone will lose sleep over them (or us, as it happens). Newbies might find themselves dying a bit more often with this implemented, but they only lose 40% of their HP and get to drop a 50% greater AP drain for it. That's a net win and another reason for this.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 19:06, 30 August 2010 (BST)
----
 
===Post Offices===
{|
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:William Burns|William Burns]] 21:19, 29 August 2010 (BST)
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Khwud|Khwud]] ([[User talk:Khwud|talk]]) 17:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
|-
|-
|'''Type:''' Building/ flavor
|'''Type:''' UI enhancement
|-
|-
|'''Scope:''' both zombies and humans
|'''Scope:''' Interface
|-
|-
|'''Description:''' In most cities around the world, there are post offices, or at least the equivalents for that region. Now in Malton, there are no post offices. I propose that some generic, non-resource, buildings are converted into post offices. These buildings would be barricadable as normal. They would have unique descriptions when both powered and unpowered. The description while powered could read "With the lights working, you can see all the undelivered mail, and the amount of it makes you want to hurt something", when the lights are off, it could read along the lines of "With no power to the lights, you can not see the mail that is waiting to be delivered". As for items and search rates inside, the only items you could find (because they governenment took everything good out of the mail when they read it) would be newspapers, firearms (postal worker rampages) and ammunition. Shotguns and pistols would both have search rates of (1%/3%), as would thier respecitve ammunition types. Newspapers, on the other hand, would be at a rate of (5%/7%).<br>Please voice your opinions.
|'''Description:''' Allow 'ignore' from radio broadcasts; users are hiding behind their anonymity to allow them to broadcast things that would broadly trigger them to be ignored, if their user ID was visible. Adding their name, or an auto-generated call-sign (it is for a radio, after all) or something so that they could be blocked based on their broadcasts would help user experience. In addition, and broadcasts that get more than a threshold number could get tagged for review, and the user potentially having their (in-game) ham-license revoked.
|}
|}
====Discussion (Post Offices)====
====Discussion (Ignore based on Radio Broadcast)====
Sorry, guns? In a post office? No. Not by any stretch of the imagination. I would support one post office somewhere in the city, replacing a wasteland, and only giving newspapers for searches.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 21:31, 29 August 2010 (BST)
:That, and possibly also books and poetry books (as some of them must be sent by mail). But then, what would the point of a post office be that a library or mall bookstore doesn't already fulfill? --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 21:39, 29 August 2010 (BST)
::That's why I like the idea of only one. One unique building would likely spawn a group to defend it, and so that would be more interesting.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 21:50, 29 August 2010 (BST)
:::Unique buildings should also offer something unique, though (like the EBS, or the walls of the forts). With post offices, I'd have no idea. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:30, 29 August 2010 (BST)
Small post offices are too small and insignificant to count for anything, and like houses, are represented simply as [[street]]. Large ones operate out of [[Buildings|Office Building]]s. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 22:35, 29 August 2010 (BST)
::::Postal worker bag! Just like the Flak Jacket, it has a special effect. makes it to where you can carry 10% more stuff in your encumberence if you have it equiped! Because you can carry stuff in it. What do ya think? put it up for voting! I like it!--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 22:37, 29 August 2010 (BST)
 
----
----
 
===Shrink the map===
===Instinctive Gait===
{|
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' {{User:Lelouch/sig}} 19:22, 28 August 2010 (BST)
|'''Timestamp:''' --[[User:Uroguy|Uroguy]]<sup>[[Zookeepers|TMZ]]</sup> 16:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
|-
|-
|'''Type:''' ffs
|'''Type:''' Map change
|-
|-
|'''Scope:''' Starting Zombies
|'''Scope:''' Everyone
|-
|'''Description:''' Why not give newbies who start as zombies Lurching Gait? They already have it pretty rough trying to find food and taking 15AP headshots, and it's not like this is any worse than giving scouts Free Running. Maybe add LG to the RM, maybe replace it, I'm not sure. Discuss.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 19:22, 28 August 2010 (BST)
|}
====Discussion (Instinctive Gait)====
Vigour Mortis is definitively the most important skill (as it's the means to gain XP at all), so it shouldn't be taken away at all. I'd be favourable towards a single extra skill for zombies, but I think it's a dupe. (One of the many suggestions for military and scientist zombies had extra skills depending on class linked to it, I think.) --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 19:29, 28 August 2010 (BST)
:Found [[Suggestion:20071001_Military%2C_and_Scientist_Zombies%3F|a dupe]], although I'm certain there were more. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 21:14, 28 August 2010 (BST)
How about just removing the daft 2AP cost altogether?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 20:38, 28 August 2010 (BST)
 
Well we now have a new function where we get directions to the nearest groan, why not add a follow button which when clicked moves you one step towards the groan for 1AP with or without Lurching Gait. It would help newbies be able to level without giving them another skill. On the other hand, it would suck to follow it and find a closed door, but at least you moved somewhere. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 21:15, 28 August 2010 (BST)
:+1 --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 22:50, 29 August 2010 (BST)
 
I like the concept. Don't touch VM, but make LG more available. Maybe start with both, maybe import [[rage]], maybe allow babahz to lurch in sync with their instincts. Either make it easier to get or make it less vital. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 22:50, 29 August 2010 (BST)
 
This NEEEEEEDS to be done in some form. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 08:58, 30 August 2010 (BST)
 
I might put this up then (as spiderzed just has my idea loosely represented as an option for part of it). Whitehouse, if you want to put that idea up, by all means go ahead.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 19:11, 30 August 2010 (BST)
----
 
===Zombie Slap===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' {{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 03:30, 28 August 2010 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' Allow zombies to slap with newspapers
|-
|'''Scope:''' Zombie with newspapers
|-
|'''Description:''' Pretty basic.  If survivors can slap others around with newspapers, why can't zombies do the same?
|}
====Discussion (Zombie Slap)====
Thoughts?  Comments?  Too short?  Too long?  What is it? --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 03:30, 28 August 2010 (BST)
:The zombie equivalent is currently clawing a person once and then saying "HAGZ!" Giving them the ability to use objects doesn't make sense to me, I'm afraid. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 03:41, 28 August 2010 (BST)
::They can already use melee weapons, so yeah. [[User:RinKou|RinKou]] 11:08, 28 August 2010 (BST)
:As Aichon. I cannot see a zombie hitting somebody with a newspaper. Gesture at them instead.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 11:10, 28 August 2010 (BST)
::It makes some sense that a zombie could wield whatever object happened to be in their hands upon death, and in fact the game allows for zeds to cycle through their inventory and select specific blunt objects from their inventory.  On the other hand, perhaps zombies couldn't grasp the idea of rolling a floppy plane into a cylinder and using this as an ineffective means of attack.  So flavor-wise I can see either argument.  I'm on the fence.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:43, 28 August 2010 (BST)
:::The way I see it, zombies already have a system of emotivism through the gesturing. Pointing easily achieves the same effect, as does Aichon's suggestion.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 20:40, 28 August 2010 (BST)
As for private signaling, there are sports weapons and toolboxes. 10% hit chance, but being hit by a zombie wielding one is outstanding enough to understand that it's an attack to communicate, not to kill. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 20:42, 28 August 2010 (BST)
:I like it, but I think you need a better name, because this one sounds a little stupid.  [[User:The3pwv|The3pwv]] 21:53, 28 August 2010 (BST)
::The name is completely irrelevant. --<span style ="background:red; color:goldenrod">'''☭ Soviet Russia ☭'''</span>    <small>'''is currently:'''{{User:Alexander_Dawkins/status}}</small> 22:02, 28 August 2010 (BST)
----
 
===Rend Ears===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 02:57, 28 August 2010 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' Skill
|-
|'''Scope:''' Zombies
|-
|'''Description:''' "Zombies begin to find new ways to reduce the efficiency of their food, looking into new techniques of damaging them. All around Malton, survivors can find zombies chewing on the ears of unfortunate survivors..."
 
Basics: On the dropdown menu for an attack after grappling a survivor, a zombie who takes this ability recieves a new option called "rend ears" this ability is a bite attack that deals half damage, but has the same effects as a regular bite attack from the zombie. Instead of attacking a survivor in general, the zombie instead attempts to make a "called shot" at the survivor's ears.
 
Effects: A survivor attacked by rend ears will find themselves unable to hear things such as feeding groans, and radio broadcasts. They also find themselves only able to pick up partial messages that players say. This effect stays active until they either A. Use a FAK, or B. Die. (where it is assumed a zombie's natural regenerative processes would fix this problem)
 
Location: Found under Digestion, or Memories of Life.
|}
====Discussion (Rend Ears)====
So, it'd basically let a zombie not only infect a survivor but render them useless as a team player until they had been FAKed, all for the cost of a single bite? I do think that Infection is underpowered at the moment, but this is not the answer. To me, this seems awfully overpowered, as well as something that would greatly diminish the fun of playing. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 03:44, 28 August 2010 (BST)
 
 
Last I checked, the game's about zombies, not Mike Tyson. [[User:RinKou|RinKou]] 11:10, 28 August 2010 (BST)
 
 
''HOLY SHIT A ZOMBIE JUST TORE MY EARS OFF!''<br>
''It's ok, I have a spare pair in my first aid kit.'' --{{User:Alexander Dawkins/Sig}} 23:48, 29 August 2010 (BST)
 
Unless a zombie is shoving something ''inside'' someone's earholes (and no, a mouth full of teeth won't fit) and damaging their eardrum, attacking a person's ears isn't going to deafen anyone - you don't hear anything with the part on the outside. Also, you'd have to make two attacks, one for each ear. --[[User:Ms.Panes|Ms.Panes]] 08:05, 30 August 2010 (BST)
 
----
 
===Memberance of music===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 02:43, 28 August 2010 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' Skill
|-
|'''Scope:''' Zombie
|-
|-
|'''Description:''' Zombie: "The dead that walk the streets have been acting strangely, seemingly attracted to louder areas. According to the necrotech employees scattered around Malton, their naturally regenerative abilities have seemed to mutate, giving them advanced hearing, and the ability to comprehend sounds they were familiar with in life.. It has also been shown that this regenerative ability is counteracted by revivification methods."
|'''Description:''' There are just over 3000 active characters in the game currently likely counting a significant percentage of alts and zergs. Shrinking the map by eliminating the outer first two rings of suburbs would increase the amount of interactions between the remaining characters. This shrink could be increased or decreased depending on future changes to the playerbase.
 
Basics: As a zombie, the player can hear gunshots from pistols and shotguns coming from OUTDOORS up to 3 buildings away, but can only tell the direction, not the exact location. If standing outside a building when gun fire occurs, they will get a message saying... "'''You hear the sounds of gunfire coming from inside the building."''' If 10 or more things are said in a building that a zombie is standing over within a 4 hour time span, the zombie will recieve the message "'''you hear a series of murmurs, and sounds from within the building'''." If 30 or more things are said within a 4 hour time span, the zombie will recieve a message saying "'''There seems to be quite the commotion inside the building'''!" meanwhile, zombies up to 1 building away will get the message '''"you hear a series of sounds nearby..."''' Finally, if a zombie is within 2 buildings of a powered club, the following will appear in the description of their current location: '''"You hear the sounds of music bellowing from (insert direction, but not exact building here)"'''
 
(these will not spam, only be said once until the zombie player logs in/out)
 
This skill would be located under Memories of Life, since the zombie would be remembering the sounds from the different stages of the outbreak/past experiences.
|}
|}
====Discussion (Memberance of music)====
====Discussion (Shrink the map)====
I found [[Suggestions/9th-Nov-2005#Ear_Shot|one]].  Now to hunt down the other possible dupes... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:57, 28 August 2010 (BST)
By all means, a survivor should always be able to tell the direction of gunshots, since they are frikkin GUNSHOTS... But a zombie would probably have to remember their sounds from when they were alive to be able to tell it was a gunshot, and not just another loud boom sound. Just wanted to clear that up ^_^ --[[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 03:04, 28 August 2010 (BST) EDIT: Also, there has been a past suggestion for just about everything, doesn't mean it can't be changed slightly and renewed!
:Lemme tell ya something.  All the guns in UD are seemingly equipped with silencers.  There are no gunshots. ;) --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 03:09, 28 August 2010 (BST)
 
Not a fan. I think that any sounds or visible objects (e.g. flares) that players should see or hear in the game should be actively produced, rather than passively produced. That is, in the case of Feeding Groan, Bellow, and flares, the player has to actively click on a button that generates that notification for other players. If someone were to fire weapons and others were to get notified, not only would it generally be spamtastic (though you address that issue to some extent), it'd give out far too much information but also decrease the signal:noise ratio. Either way, it's bad for everyone. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 04:23, 28 August 2010 (BST)
----
----


===Zombie Safehouse===
===Action Points===
{|
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' {{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:10, 26 August 2010 (BST)
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Wolldog1]] 10:07, 26 July 26, 2022
|-
|-
|'''Type:''' Zombie Skill
|'''Type:''' Action Points Increase Regeneration Rate
|-
|'''Scope:''' Zombies
|-
|'''Description:''' Basically Im bouncing ideas. Zombies in a ruined building can make it their safehouse (lair? domain? charnel house? ) Cost would be something. Suggested Position in skill tree, below [[Ransack]] . Benefits? Who knows, but i'd suggest something like. Stand up cost reduced by 1ap, or the ability to hear feeding groans inside the building (you ransack the place further, punching holes in the walls) or ruin costs accelerate. Something like that. Anyway, its a skeleton. Discuss. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:10, 26 August 2010 (BST)
|}
====Discussion (Zombie Safehouse)====
Chance to avoid attacks at 10%?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 20:10, 26 August 2010 (BST)
:I'd rather an advantage to zombies than a disadvantage for survivors. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:44, 26 August 2010 (BST)
::A dodge chance would also mess with Scent Trail, one of the most potent skills a pro loiterer can have. Feral Undead has found many a snack in Whittensdie thanks to that. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 20:54, 26 August 2010 (BST)
 
I don't really see much sense in it, as the imperative of a zombie should be to stay mobile and look for new targets.<br>
Hearing feeding groans inside would take away one of the few important decisions (to stay inside and hinder cading/reclamation,or to stay outside and hear groans), so I'm not too keen on it.<br>
Accelerated decay sounds more fun (and like something some FU's would love to do to Fort Feral), but how should it work? Should the game check at server refresh (when the ruin counter goes up) if the zambah is inside his fave barn? Should the zombie invest APs after "scouting" his barn? --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 20:54, 26 August 2010 (BST)
:Its difficult, because your thoughts on zombies are that they should move about. Ironically thats my idea of what survivors should do. Perhaps every zombie inside their safehouse at server reset adds 1ap to the ruin cost? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 21:36, 26 August 2010 (BST)
::So the RRF (or zergs for that matter) send their 100 accounts in to a building before midnight and make it so hard to regain that it's parallel with being ruined for 3 months?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 23:06, 26 August 2010 (BST)
:::And yeah, that was the first thing that occurred to me too. I could just see some of the famous buildings in Malton either being perma-ruined, or else the unfortunate survivors that repair them being comatose for weeks or months afterwards. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 23:36, 26 August 2010 (BST)
::::I also find it highly likely that somebody would soon find the upper bound of Kevan's system and break the game in some unpredictable way.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 23:40, 26 August 2010 (BST)
6AP to set, decay rate doubles. Doesn't stack, even if multiple zeds do it, which they can. This mirrors the six-days-to-break-even functionality of safehouses. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 21:42, 26 August 2010 (BST)
:What causes it to lose the effect? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 21:52, 26 August 2010 (BST)
::Being repaired. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 21:53, 26 August 2010 (BST)
:::Headshot? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 22:04, 26 August 2010 (BST)
::::Nope, just repair. Easier to fix a ruin than ruin a populated building. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 22:06, 26 August 2010 (BST)
 
I'm with Spiderzed on this one. Zombies are supposed to move around by nature. While I really dig groups like the [[Daubeney Resident Zambahz]] or the [[SFHNAS]] since they're both awesome groups and make things fun, I feel that, in general, zombies are supposed to follow the food source, wherever it may go, and that means moving with the survivors and giving chase if the survivors flee. I feel that survivors should be moving too, but, given the genre and lore, survivors making safe houses makes a lot more sense than zombies having dens/lairs or the like. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 22:47, 26 August 2010 (BST)
----
 
===An Extra Character a Day===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' {{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:30, 25 August 2010 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' More IP hits, enough for just one more character
|-
|-
|'''Scope:''' Everyone
|'''Scope:''' Everyone
|-
|-
|'''Description:''' When there were over 50,000+ characters roaming Malton, I thought it was pretty reasonable to keep the IP hits at 160, even if it was just to keep the server from overloading. But with the population currently at less than 20,000 characters, I think the IP hit should be adjusted from 160 to 210, just to allow one extra character per player to be played.  That is, of course, until the population reaches 50,000+ again...
|'''Description:''' Due to the passage of time with mobile games and other real time action games without restriction,  I think that we should address the action points system of the game. This game can only realistically be played for 5 minutes a day. So it's not really a seller for new blood. If we want to see this game survive it needs to evolve into something more exciting than 5 minutes. My suggestion is double the regeneration rate to improve activity. I love this game. I want to play it more. And the die hard fans I'm sure feel the same. More will go on in a day, sure. But that's for both sides. We're ready for it. Let's get this game moving again. We need this.
|}
====Discussion (An Extra Character a Day)====
I'm assuming many of you probably won't like this, but how will I know until I post it? --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:30, 25 August 2010 (BST)
 
 
I'm indifferent to it, really. I guess I could get on board, but I've not found myself playing my alts enough recently to hit the 160 limit often. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 16:42, 25 August 2010 (BST)
:OMG WILL SUM1 PLZ THINK OF TEH ZERGS -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:14, 26 August 2010 (BST)
I hit the limit every day, and still I wouldn't back this. I find it sufficient. Pay or play with 3.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 16:46, 25 August 2010 (BST)
 
I've run into enough friends who haven't donated and really can't enjoy certain aspects of the game as fully as those who have donated that I ''want'' to lean in favor of it. That said, I also know that the game only goes as long as money keeps coming in to cover the costs, and making it easier to do the things that usually are reserved for paid characters isn't a good idea in that regard. I guess, in the end, for the good of the game, I'm slightly leaning towards "no". {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:33, 25 August 2010 (BST)
 
If Kev creates another city, then Yes, otherwise, nay.--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 21:37, 25 August 2010 (BST)
 
Someone on the FOM suggestions system once said "if people are making suggestions begging for P2P benefits to become free then we know it's doing its job." This is similar imo. Honestly, you only need to pay for your main and you're usually set for your alts, assuming your main will take up the most IP hits and attention. So, yeah, it's 5 bucks, and it's for a good cause (especially if you use UD/Wiki as much as we do), and it lasts a lifetime. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 11:14, 26 August 2010 (BST)
 
{{Donated|Revenant}} {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 13:06, 26 August 2010 (BST)
 
I have donated for each and every of my current alts (and even for some that are idled). That being said, I'd be in favour of amending the IP limit, and if alone to make the town more lively. It's not like zerging will be made much worse by it - the majority of zergs use anyway proxies and aren't subject to the IP hit rules as honest players are. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 20:57, 26 August 2010 (BST)
:Judging from the ratio of like/dislike comments, there's more dislike...Maybe I should have increased donated IP as well from 300 to 400...If most people don't agree with that, well, we can toss this suggestion. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 23:45, 26 August 2010 (BST)
----
 
===Extend scout safehouse to ruined buildings===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' {{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 11:01, 25 August 2010 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' Possible overpowered
|-
|'''Scope:''' Ruined buildings
|-
|'''Description:''' Right. As it stands, the recent update (but not too recent) did very little with it's scout safehouse feature, and did nothing towards helping survivors. Hence, I would suggest to extend the ability to scout safehouses to ruined buildings. There are several reasons for this.
 
First a flavour reason: ''Due to the massive amounts of damage caused across the city, survivors have begun to set up shop in ruined buildings, using any shelter avaliable to hide from the zombies that haunt the streets.'' - I think it adds a high level of flavour for survivors to be hiding not just in pristine buildings, but in ruins as well. It would also encourage [[Hiding in Plain Sight]], which is an under-rated tactic, imo.
 
Secondly, a strategic reason. Currently, other than in mall seiges, there's very little to gain from the update. What I propose would allow people to do the one action people usually do in ruins; repair, more easily. Now, what this would entail is 31AP to be spent on the ruin before the repair begins, so this would mainly effect suicide repairs, or repairs greater than 32AP. It would then provide a gamble of whether the action would be successful or not. There would be a 10% chance to de-ruin the building with AP to spare, but most of the time you'd be running the risk of sleeping in a ruined building for the night.
 
Third, a tactical / increasing fun reason. This would mainly apply to suburbs which have been ruined for over a month. From what I've seen (playing in a suburb that's been ruined for 18 months) lots of survivors quit the game because their home suburb is ruined permanently. What this suggestion would mean is a higher turnover rate for ruined suburbs. Instead of being permanently ruined until the horde moves on, they would be easier to take after a month. They also wouldn't get to the point of every building being 500AP+ and requiring survivors to organise 100 people just to survive a day.
 
'''However''', I see that this suggesstion is potentially overpowered. And by potentially, I mean completely. What was 500AP can now be reduced to 31. Now, with a bit of maths, if 1 in 10 times it's reduced, the average is made 453. For a 200Ap building, the average is made 183. For a 100AP building it's 93. Overall, it would be a 3-9% decrease in the power of ruins.
 
'''Short version''': Scout safehosue usable in ruins. Adds flavour, tactical suburb turnover, and gives a use to SS in big ruin repairs. There would be a 3-9% decrease in the power of ruin.
 
Thoughts?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 11:01, 25 August 2010 (BST)
|}
====Discussion (Extend scout safehouse to ruined buildings)====
Thoughts? Point number 5 under "Please Read Before Posting". Otherwise, I agree that the truth of the safehouse update is somewhat disappointing as a survivor, but I think that the ruin factor of it is necessary. Now, if we wanted to talk about knocking the cost for scouting in half... {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 11:18, 25 August 2010 (BST)
:In my opinion, the update required no adjustment. It essentially merited no change, and most people have already come to solid conclusions on it. I see this as patching a hole in an update which really didn't do much.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 11:20, 25 August 2010 (BST)
 
I dislike this. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 16:13, 25 August 2010 (BST)
 
I have yet to use '''Scout Safehouse''' for precisely this reason. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 13:08, 26 August 2010 (BST)
 
No. Ruins are already far underpowered, HIPS is overpowered, and it would do away with the zombie mobility Kevan just created. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 04:46, 28 August 2010 (BST)
 
----
 
===Flaming Carved Pumpkins===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' {{User:Vapor/sig}} 20:45, 23 August 2010 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' Item Creation
|-
|'''Scope:''' Survivors with a flare for the dramatic
|-
|'''Description:''' Survivors with the items pumpkin, knife, gas can, and flare may create a flaming carved pumpkin projectile capable of doing 17 damage (2 base damage plus 15 fuel-soaked clothing damage). If all required items are in one's inventory, clicking on a pumpkin produces the text {{udspan|using your knife, you carve a face into the pumpkin. Pouring gasoline inside, you stand back and fire your flare gun.}} This combination of actions costs 5AP and adds a flaming carved pumpkin to your inventory. The flare gun, gas can and uncarved pumpkin are removed from inventory. Carrying the flaming carved pumpkin will cause a loss of 1HP per action similar to infection and the pumpkin will extinguish after 10 actions. An extinguished pumpkin is lost from your inventory and is assumed to have completely burned away. The flaming carved pumpkin can be used as a projectile weapon with base 10% accuracy. Survivors with hand-to-hand combat have 25% accuracy. A successful hit with the flaming carved pumpkin causes the usual base 2 damage plus an additional 15 fuel-soaked clothing damage.
 
====Discussion (Flaming Carved Pumpkin)====
If this is a holiday special item, then my opinion is this: Holiday special things shouldn't do damage. They should just be collectible clothing, decorative items, or flavour text (Well, for the decorative items, then sure, but with very low damage). --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 20:48, 23 August 2010 (BST)
:Since [[Halloween#Pumpkins|Pumpkins]] can already be used as melee weapons, this would be an additional option. Many players are still hording pumpkins and with Halloween around the corner, there could possibly be more (pending a Halloween update). Christmas trees are also available as melee weapons, which is a holiday item. I'm not suggestiong flaming Christmas trees, though. {{User:Vapor/sig}} 20:57, 23 August 2010 (BST)
::How are you certain that we'll have Pumpkins again this year?  Maybe we'll get eggs. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 21:04, 23 August 2010 (BST)
:::Or maybe we'll wake up in a bath of ice with a note saying "dial 999".--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 21:06, 23 August 2010 (BST)
::::Nope, not certain of more pumpkins. That's why I said pending Halloween update. This suggestion would be an update released along with an Halloween update that includes pumpkins. If eggs or ice baths or bearded gnomes is what we get, then the discussion is moot. {{User:Vapor/sig}} 21:12, 23 August 2010 (BST)
:::::I'd rather take the eggs.  Mischief is what should be done during Halloween. ;) --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 16:16, 25 August 2010 (BST)
 
Not a fan of crazy four-item combining tricks myself.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 20:59, 23 August 2010 (BST)
 
===Self Harm===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:24, 21 August 2010 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' Attacks aimed at self
|-
|'''Scope:''' Mostly death cultists
|-
|'''Description:''' There's been a few suggestions that would aid death culting and parachuting in general, such as self-infecting or gunshot suicides, but mostly it's an issue of power, being shot down due to the idea of easier parachuting circumventing barricades, and therefore saving huge amounts of AP. Well, in order to circumvent the AP imbalance, how about allowing a character to attack themselves with a knife (only a knife), same AP cost and damage as attacking another character, only with an 85% to-hit rate. That way, without an infection, a new-revived cultist can spend around 18-20 AP trying to kill themselves, which is, admittedly, a saving on infection - the crucial difference being that an infected parachutist can spend the AP barricading for a pinata, searching for items, or attacking characters or generators, whilst a self-harming character spends the AP with the sole aim of reducing their health. This would be a much weaker way of doing it, but is more reliable in that it can't be FAKed away. The imperfect accuracy is mechanically for balance, and flavour-wise can be explained by using {{udspan|You attempt to slash yourself with your knife, but can't bring yourself to do it.}} as the miss text. Successful hit text would be {{udspan|You slash yourself with your knife for 2 damage.}} Numbers are still rough-ish. Thoughts?
|}
|}
====Discussion (Self Harm)====
====Discussion (Action Points)====
Nicely done.  Without running the numbers or whatever I'd say it sounds quite reasonable.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 19:26, 21 August 2010 (BST)
:Tasteless, and pretty pointless, IMO.--{{User:Mallrat/sig}} 20:33, 21 August 2010 (BST)
 
85% accuracy and 2 damage gives 1.7 damage per attack, meaning you can take down 30 hp in 17-18 AP, and 25 hp in 14-15 AP, assuming average success for those numbers.  You die faster than you would of infection, and probably stand up with about 30-35 AP, but you do have a point about not spending those pre-death AP on doing anything otherwise useful.  Maybe this will get a better reception. --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 22:48, 21 August 2010 (BST)
:In response to the above maths, maybe a drop to 80%. You want it to be just more efficient than infection. Since this would be readily available to anyone, it should be considerably less convenient. Infection can be prevented by a single heal, whereas this would be far more effective. So, yeah, 80% for 19AP, 75% for 20AP. Perhaps 65% would be most appropriate (23AP). Ultimately, it comes down to how much of an advantage you want to give, but I would definitely say that the lack of freedom doign the damage does not balance a substantially lower AP.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 23:05, 21 August 2010 (BST)
::65%, 1.3 damage/AP looks okay to me -- maybe not terribly sensible that it's so inconsistent to injure yourself, but it wouldn't leave people standing up with a nearly full AP charge, normally.  For folks who don't like infection, though, this could make being infected go by a lot faster.  At 2.3 damage/AP it takes about 13 AP to strip off 30 hp, 11ish to take off 25.  Then again, presence of infected survivors ''should'' be a significant threat. --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 02:35, 22 August 2010 (BST)
 
I'm sensing if this gets implemented, we'll be seeing a lot of emo people in Urban Dead soon... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 23:21, 21 August 2010 (BST)
 
I like it, both in regards of flavour as in regards of mechanics. There must be some desperate people who'd rather cut themselves than let themselves be eaten by zombies, as well as weird cultists sacrificing themselves to whatever dark power. In other news, I wanna start a new DC group called [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_12E1EN6fs Judean People's Front Crack Suicide Squad] --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 02:43, 22 August 2010 (BST)
 
Nah. I'm over suicide based suggestions. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 02:52, 22 August 2010 (BST)
 
Hell no. It defeats the purpose of HAVING BARRICADES. --[[User:Zamins|Zamins]] 02:20, 23 August 2010 (BST)
:Let me direct you to [[Parachuting|AN ALREADY EXTANT TACTIC]]. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:21, 23 August 2010 (BST)
 
I want this now! Mostly so we can pull a Jim Jones in some mall. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 02:33, 23 August 2010 (BST)
 
Jump off a building if you want to die--{{User:Rictor_Stilwell/sig}} 01:34, 26 August 2010 (BST)
:The point is to die ''inside''. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:19, 26 August 2010 (BST)
 
Self-harm was deliberately removed from the game. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 13:11, 26 August 2010 (BST)
----
----


===Syringe Priming===
===Drone===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Warbird108|Warbird108]] 16:41, 21 August 2010 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' Revivification Modification (skill)
|-
|'''Scope:''' All Survivors that buy the skill and its prerequisites and have syringes.
|-
|'''Description:''' I propose allowing survivors with the proper skill (would be added as a subset of Lab Experience) to prime syringes, reducing AP costs at the time of revivification. The act of priming a syringe would cost 5 AP, and reduce the syringe usage cost to 5 AP. (Syringes can still be used un-primed, at the original AP cost of 10). A primed syringe would have a (Primed) note after the item name. This addition would allow survivors to "bank" AP for revivification, allowing more revives to be done in one wave, albeit with a longer delay between revives. Useful for unclogging revive points, reclaiming a suburb, etc. This would add a mechanic not unlike searching for ammo for scientist characters (a primed syringe is a firearm, needing less AP for a "kill" while requiring preparation, whereas an un-primed syringe is a melee weapon: more AP for a "kill" but requiring no banking of AP, besides the AP needed to find the syringe).
|}
====Discussion (Syringe Priming)====
Hmm. Personally. I'd make one of them cost an additional ap. Probably the revivification. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 16:44, 21 August 2010 (BST)
 
Would make clearing salted NTs even more easy than it is already. Also, revives are already too cheap as they are, so I'm not keen on anything that saves even more APs for them (even if it's just banking APs in advance). --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 16:50, 21 August 2010 (BST)
*Hmm...how about if syringes can only be primed in a powered NT (could require specific lab equipment that is only present in NTs), and will become "de-primed" (or become useless completely) if not used in 24 hours or so, a la Aeon17x's suggestion; this would prevent it from being so easy to un-salt an unpowered NT: there would have to be a powered NT nearby in order for the syringes to be viable. Furthermore, this would emphasize NTs as being the key building to bring back online in a ghost/infested suburb. --[[User:Warbird108|Warbird108]] 17:19, 21 August 2010 (BST)
 
What if they have an expiration date? Like once primed you have to use them within <s>50 AP</s> 24 hours or it'll go bad. --[[User:Aeon17x|Aeon17x]] 16:52, 21 August 2010 (BST)
 
How about this - syringes that are manufactured (20AP in a powered NT) only cost 5AP to revive with, abd have a different name to differentiate them from regular syringes. That way you can still bank up the AP for a big suicide revive, but it takes a committed effort and makes it a strategic thing and not just a way to make things easier. Spend a week gathering these manufactured syringes and you can easily strafe a ghost town, but for regular revives they aren't worth it. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:02, 21 August 2010 (BST)
:Hmm, I like the idea of giving some point to Manufactured Syringes.--{{User:Mallrat/sig}} 20:35, 21 August 2010 (BST)
:I think that may actually be a dupe, but I can't recall.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 20:59, 21 August 2010 (BST)
:I don't know if it's a dupe or not either, but I do like the idea of giving a point to manufactured syringes, beyond just overspending into negative AP if you know you're going to be away from the game for more than 24 hours. --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 02:28, 22 August 2010 (BST)
:Yes. I support this even though it will never be implemented.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 21:14, 22 August 2010 (BST)
----
 
===Reopen Monroeville===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' --{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 03:21, 20 August 2010 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' City Reopening
|-
|'''Scope:''' Everyone who misses the old city.
|-
|'''Description:''' Reopen it for a week or so Kevin! Everyone sure misses the old city. Plus, On top of that, I can't find my old account for it. >.< So, Why the Hell not?
|}
====Discussion (Reopen Monroeville)====
It's ''Kev'''a'''n''. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 09:42, 20 August 2010 (BST)
 
I'd say not. If they reopened Monroe, it would detract a bit from Malton (which already has a dwindling population). Not good. {{User:Shadok/sig}} 13:08, 20 August 2010 (BST)
:Actulley, I hear people complaining all the time they miss monroeville. Kevan could make it to where there was a break in the quarintine fence, and how monroeville will only be open for a few days befor it got fixed.
--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 13:11, 20 August 2010 (BST)
 
Ya. Or make a new city that doesn't share the shit aspects of the other 2 temp ones. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:14, 20 August 2010 (BST)
:Didn't Ross design another city? --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 15:24, 20 August 2010 (BST)
::Bits and pieces, but its more a brainstorm. Once its done Kev can scroll through and think "I always wanted a maze and an entire suburb thats a big melty clock". --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:07, 20 August 2010 (BST)
:::It's only 98% melty clock. Also it's all breaking into its constituent parts. For shame, Ross. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 23:22, 20 August 2010 (BST)
:Implement AHLG's game.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 23:19, 20 August 2010 (BST)
::Also yes.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 23:19, 20 August 2010 (BST)
:::So, Vote Time?--{{User:Jerrel Yokotory/signature}}. 01:51, 24 August 2010 (BST)
 
===Used Needle===
{|
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 05:53, 17 August 2010 (BST)
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Rosslessness|<span style="color: MidnightBlue ">R</span><span style="color: Navy">o</span><span style="color: DarkBlue">s</span><span style="color: MediumBlue">s</span><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span>]][[User_Talk:Rosslessness|<span style="color: RoyalBlue">l</span><span style="color: CornflowerBlue">e</span><span style="color: SkyBlue">s</span><span style="color: LightskyBlue">s</span>]][[User_Talk:Rosslessness/Quiz|<span style="color: LightBlue">n</span><span style="color: PowderBlue">e</span>]][[Monroeville Many|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]][[The Great Suburb Group Massacre|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]]<sup>[[Location Page Building Toolkit|<span style="color: DarkRed">Want a Location Image?]] </span> </sup>  19:10, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
|-
|-
|'''Type:''' New Item
|'''Type:''' Survivor Item
|-
|-
|'''Scope:''' Survivors
|'''Scope:''' Survivors
|-
|-
|'''Description:''' A used needle can be found in the streets (2% search chance) or junkyards (2.5% chance/5% powered). A used needle is also produced any time a NecroTech syringe is expended (whether or not the revive is successful).  Players can adjust their settings to automatically discard used needles regardless of whether they're found, or produced through syringe use, if desired.
|'''Description:''' Portable drone, found in mall tech stores, which are pointless as we all know. Encumbrance is 10%. When activated for 15ap they provide an image of a 10x10 grid centred on the survivor, showing the current outside status of all blocks including zombies, survivors and dead bodies. Like DNA scanners, Drones are multi use.
 
A used needle takes up 2% encumbrance, as a NecroTech syringe.  It requires 1 AP to apply, and is expended when applied.  Used needles can only be applied to their own users.
 
A survivor who applies a used needle becomes infected, as if bitten by a zombie with the Infectious Bite skill.
|}
|}
====Discussion (Used Needle)====
====Discussion (Drone)====
An option for the unwillingly alive in the absence of other suicide options (low zombie presence, no access to tall buildings).  Could be used for nefarious purposes, but significantly less easy and efficient than an immediate and automatic suicide item. --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 05:54, 17 August 2010 (BST)
Would there be a message displayed to the players to the effect of "there's a drone buzzing overhead", similar to a flare? --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 02:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 
Yes. Fuck yes. Fuck fuck yes. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 06:05, 17 August 2010 (BST)
 
LOL AIDS? Do this '''one one condition'''- that the option to NOT keep empty syringes after using syringes is made in Settings (ie you can choose to throw it away once you've tried to rev a zombie) so people that don't want one aren't spammed up. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 06:12, 17 August 2010 (BST)
:Oh yeah, absolutely.  I took that as a given and just forgot to mention it when I wrote this up. {{unsigned|Nuisance}}
::Ah, no probs. Just making sure. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 06:19, 17 August 2010 (BST)
:::I guess since this isn't in voting, just being tinkered with as an initial idea, I can go ahead and make that change, here. --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 06:23, 17 August 2010 (BST)  And done. --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 06:25, 17 August 2010 (BST)
:Getting needles should probably be switched off by default. As hilarious as it would be for a newbvivor to click one out of curiosity, it would be a lot more frustrating than getting gangbanged in your sleep. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 05:32, 21 August 2010 (BST)
::That would be a problem (though also funny).  What about including a confirm message with warning (like you get when jumping from a tall building) when you try to use them, instead? --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 13:24, 21 August 2010 (BST)
So, pretty much this would just be used for death cultists to parachute whenever they feel like it.  I'm a zombie player, I stand at a revive point, load up on ammo etc, and then when I'm ready to attack the building that I've been struggling to break into, I just waltz in behind the cades, infect myself, and time my death so that I can stand up with near full AP as a zombie and cause havoc.  Nice way of circumventing the barricades and controlling precisely when and how you wish to parachute.  Overpowered.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 07:49, 17 August 2010 (BST)
:I don't know where you've been playing that you can stand around in a populated area with almost no hp and wait around 10 hours for your AP to recharge without being PKed or FAKed, but it sounds like a rather apathetic 'burb. --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 08:32, 17 August 2010 (BST)
::So on the one hand you're saying that this would help players turn into zombies, and on the other hand you're saying people couldn't use this to turn into zombies because they would be healed too quickly.  So which is it?  You can't eat your cake and have it too.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 12:47, 17 August 2010 (BST)
:::I'm saying your ignorance is showing.  "Just waltz in behind the cades, infect myself, and time my death so that I can stand up with near full AP as a zombie and cause havoc" might be an issue ''if'' it didn't take at least 1 AP per hp to die of infection -- in other words, at least 25 for a fresh revivee who started off pre-infected, and who lacks Body Building.  In practice, anyone who kills himself in this way will not have anything like near full AP.  If this were a 1-AP immediate indoor suicide move like shooting yourself, you'd have a point (and I'd agree that's overpowered), but it's not and you don't.--[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 19:09, 17 August 2010 (BST)
::::I'm not going to get into a pissing contest, so I'll just rephrase my question.  ''Which is a quicker death, jumping off a building or dying from an infection?''  I think you know the answer.  So I am saying that the only practical application for these needles would be for death cultists who want to parachute.  And despite my "ignorance", I would argue that it's not that difficult to time your death from infection to correspond with near full AP.  In fact, I do it whenever my zombie character is lucky enough to be revived with an infection.  However if players can infect themselves whenever they want then they can parachute whenever they want and they can get behind the barricades as zombies whenever they want, which is overpowered, q.e.d.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 22:16, 17 August 2010 (BST)
:::::That's not an argument so much as a claim, and a pretty meaningless one with no given definition of "near full" AP (I would say no less than 40 AP after arriving inside the building as standing undead), but I digress.  Bickering back and forth with anecdotes and vagaries is pointless.  Instead, let me ask you a question.  This developing suggestion notwithstanding, do you believe parachuting is overpowered in and of itself?<p>Jumping off a building has nothing to do with this suggestion.  For people without Free Running, and people in suburbs that have turned into EHB Fortresses of Doom in the absence of zombies to wear things down, jumping off a building may not be an option, or may require so much running around that dying of infection would be quicker, if they had one.  Sadly, yes there ''are'' people around [[BOW/Suicide_Prevention_Protocol|deliberately trying to make it impossible to get back to death]], probably because they think they can "win".  For people that do want to parachute, it would miss the point entirely. --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 00:13, 18 August 2010 (BST)
::::::I'm actually going to answer your question instead of deflecting.  I do not think parachuting is overpowered.  I think that ''your suggestion'' is overpowered, as I've already outlined in my "claim".  No reason to repeat myself.  And I do think jumping off a building has something to do with your suggestion.
::::::I'll explain.  If you're proposing that zeds need a game change in order to stay dead then I would like to bring up 3 great options that already exist.  1) Jump off a building.  2) Stand outside with your brethren and say "eat me".  3) Get brain rot.  If none of these options are available and you really want to help out the semi-dedicated zombie player who finds themselves combat revived in a pristine green EHB suburb with not a single other zombie outside, then perhaps you should suggest some sort of outdoor suicide option.
::::::These needles you propose would really only be used for the nefarious purposes which you hinted at in your intro, by offering zombies a consistent way to circumvent survivors' best defense. --{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 01:24, 18 August 2010 (BST) 
:::::::The ability to choose when to be infected is not as big a buff as you seem to think it is.  Whether you stood up infected, or infected yourself after standing, you still need to spend the AP on burning through the hp you have left, and that's AP not contributing to your ability to "stand up with near full AP as a zombie and cause havoc".  Even without Body Building, it takes just over half a day's AP to burn up the hp from being revived.  This doesn't change that.  In a situation where you could nearly burn yourself out, wait for your AP to recharge to capacity, then finish dying and stand up with near full AP without being FAKed or killed in the meantime (which I still find questionable), there's no significant difference from having stood up infected in the first place, except that it cost you the AP to infect yourself, and the AP used up on acquiring a used needle in the first place.  It's difficult to understand your position here, let alone make any attempt to satisfy you, because the basis of your objection seems to be either a misunderstanding of the reality of parachuting, or deliberate falsehood.  I asked if you find parachuting overpowered, you say you don't, but I've still not seen much against this idea that isn't either also true of normal infection and parachuting, or simply untrue.  Is it just being able to spend your own AP instead of somebody else's (the zombie that bit you) on this that actually bothers you? --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 01:58, 18 August 2010 (BST)
::::::::Pretty much, yeh.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 03:34, 18 August 2010 (BST)
 
I could be convinced either way on this one.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 09:29, 17 August 2010 (BST)
 
Any thoughts on the search odds?  With Malton's history we should all be knee-deep in these things no matter which block we're in, but I didn't want to make it ''too'' easy to search one up, particularly with an alternative method to get them.  I kept them out of TRPs out of a desire not to dilute anything critical -- besides, if anywhere observes proper sharps disposal it would be NTs and hospitals.. --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 09:41, 17 August 2010 (BST)
:Personally I don't like the idea but haven't really formaulted why beyond that Misanthropy likes it <jk>. If this is adopted, it should still take 10AP to apply, just like a revival jab. Injecting yourself isn't easy whether it's a clean or dirty needle.--{{User:Mallrat/sig}} 16:05, 17 August 2010 (BST)
::A failed jab costs only 1 AP. The reason the revive cost was increased to 10 AP was because the zombie virus strain mutated (seriously, read the update). Injecting harmanz would not have that drawback.<br/>Also, why not be able to use used needles on others? (Well, apart from the whole skill separation argument…) Infection isn't particularly overpowered. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 18:04, 17 August 2010 (BST)
:::While it does make sense that you could infect others with used needles, it's just not a can of worms I want to open.  You'd have text rapists using it as a new component of their disgusting roleplay, people complaining about how it's an overpowered attack even though you pretty much only die of infection if you do it on purpose, etc.  I don't see that any potential benefit outweighs the downsides, and it seemed less contentious to just leave that option out altogether.
I do find it a bit sad that the only people in the game that will do the classic zombie movie move of dropping dead in a "safe" place and then getting up to attack are death cultists and DNP followers, and in practice the dual natures almost never do because it's trivially easy to cure infection if you're playing as a survivor.--[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 19:21, 17 August 2010 (BST)
 
'''Question''' - What if I have an empty needle and I'm in a powered NT, does this mean I can make a new syringe for half the cost since I already have an existing needle?
 
'''Another Question''' - Can I chose to stab others? If so is 1AP fair? In theory I can waltz into a mall, spend the night and then stab 25 people and infect them before just walking away.
 
'''Last Question''' - Assuming I jam a large needle into your neck I would imagine this should do some minor damage to you, so should it get a damage percentage, if your talking its 100% chance to infect someone then is it 100% chance of dealing 1 damage?
 
'''I lied''' - Now the infection itself has been around for quite some time, its a pretty decent theory that some people are going to be more immune to the effects of it, being situations where they have been infected so much their body has started to build immunities to said virus, also some people are just naturally immune to some things, so should this be 100% chance of infecting people, should it be 50% maybe a little more, kinda based on your hand to hand skill (so if I'm better at hand to hand I'm more likely to jam a needle into a major vein or artery versus being a total newb with fighting and I just kinda stab at you with a needle and scratch your finger) --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 00:56, 18 August 2010 (BST)
:No, these will not speed up producing new syringes.  These are contaminated, more likely than not slightly damaged medical waste.  Easy enough to prick your finger and get the virus into your blood, but not so easy to sterilize, repair and refill that it would make any significant difference in manufacture time.<br />"Used needles can only be applied to their own users." I probably do need to find a clearer wording to indicate that these can't be used to infect others, only yourself.<br />With the rate for finding/producing these, I think it would cost you more AP to acquire 25 needles and use them than it would for others to find and apply 25 FAKs to undo the effects.  That said, I still don't think it's a good idea to allow these to be used on other people, regardless of how low the chance to connect the attack is.  There's just too much chance for offense, and too little benefit to be worth chancing it. --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 01:18, 18 August 2010 (BST)
:In response to question four: All players have a total and complete infection of the virus at all times. Only when dead, the virus has the opportunity to turn you into a zombie. When revived, you're brought back to life, but the virus remains dormant until you die, giving it the opportunity to continue the cycle. Hence why PKers turn you into a zombie.
:When you're bitten by a zombie, you simply fall victim to the huge variety of bacteria that grows in all human mouths, and flourishes when the immune system takes a vacation, hygiene is discarded as useless, and fresh flesh is often present. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 05:32, 21 August 2010 (BST)
 
Sounds pretty decent, but for the record I have had some VERY successful searchs for needles in the past, and very unsuccessful ones for FAK's it all depends on the RNG and how many virgins have been sacrificed to it today --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 01:29, 18 August 2010 (BST)
:Well yes, we've probably all had streaks of good or bad luck, but I think it's probably a better idea to make predictions based on expected averages over time, not the best or worst luck possible. --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 02:02, 18 August 2010 (BST)
 
If it allows zombies or DCs to bypass barricades with none of the tedious and difficult risks associated with obtaining a current infection, then I don't like it. Even if this isn't allowed to infect other players, any parachutist can drop into a building with about 20 AP free to start spreading the germs; they even leave the further obstacle of their own removal. I've read the above arguments on parachuting and find myself unswayed.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 00:11, 21 August 2010 (BST)
 
Oh god no, it gives zombies a huuuge advantage.  --[[User:Zamins|Zamins]] 07:05, 21 August 2010 (BST)
:I'd like you to elaborate on this, please.  At this point I've decided I'm just going to flatly ignore the opinions of people who have an issue with DC or parachuting in general, as there can be no satisfying them.  But maybe you have a concern that can be addressed reasonably.  How do you think this gives zombies a huuuge advantage? --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 13:22, 21 August 2010 (BST)
::What's the point in taking your suggestion here if you're just going to flatly ignore anyone who disagrees?  I'd like to suggest an alternative - ''"monument and carpark suicide:  now survivors stranded outside the barricades can climb on top of tall monuments and carpark structures and leap to their deaths.  Carparks and monuments cannot be barricaded or ruined as they are outdoors, nor can they be used to free run into other buildings, as they are not close enough to existing structures."''  This addresses your concern about newb solitary zombies without infection getting combat revived in EHB green suburbs where no other zombies exist (basically an impossible scenario anyway), while also not messing with current parachuting dynamics.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 15:48, 21 August 2010 (BST) 
:::I'm not going to ignore anyone who disagrees.  I'm going to ignore anyone who disagrees for the wrong reason.  I don't care how you dress it up, when your reaction is essentially a knee-jerk "omg zombee spaiz, this suggestion affects them with them without being a ban or giant nerf and is therefore overpowered!" your opinion is wrong (despite popular belief, they ''can'' be) and worthless here.  I can't remove culting from the game, nor do I want to, and this discussion is not for the people that would, as they won't be satisfied with anything less than that removal.  I do want to be made aware of of any real problems with the idea (particularly any math bits I may have overlooked), but I'm not going to kowtow to simple disapproval of a certain play style.<br /><br />As an aside, I do like your idea of monument and carpark suicide.  While it's clearly just meant to strip the primary benefit out of mine and leave only the secondary stuff, I think it's a good one.  Would certainly make being low-level undead in a green 'burb less of a pain in the ass. --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 22:24, 21 August 2010 (BST)
 
This basically breaks the significance of barricades, which is a core game mechanic. Right now, parachuting death cultists aren't a significant issue, since they have to coordinate with a zombie in order to gain infection. With this addition, a group of death cultists could sneak into a mall and infect themselves, completely circumventing barricades. Almost game-breaking, to say the least. --[[User:Warbird108|Warbird108]] 16:25, 21 August 2010 (BST)
:You do realize a coordinated group of death cultists will have at least one currently-dead member ready and willing to infect them when they need to be, right?  And that if they're taking down each other's hp to hasten death, they don't need to be infected in the first place?  What are they going to do, get infected, work their way down to 1 hp apiece, hang around till they've got 50 AP again without being attacked or healed, then drop dead and attack with full AP?  It doesn't work that way, and if it did it would work just as well with damage by bullets or damage from a standard-issue infection.  If this helps any death cultist, it's the independent, not the strike team member, and all it gives them is a slight increase of convenience doing what they can and will do anyway.  Where do you get the idea that this will be so much more significant and powerful applied to groups of death cultists? --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 22:32, 21 August 2010 (BST)
::This allows every death cultist to take their infection into their own hands, not only completely removing the zombie from the picture, but also allowing each DC to spend their own AP doing it, without relying on a zombie's chance to miss and total AP. Not only that, but a DC could simply walk into a deserted VSB entry point, stick themselves with a needle, search until they were down to a couple HP, wait for their AP to regen, and then jump into a mall, or other TRP. Parachuting is one of the most griefing tactics in the game, and I see it as akin to PKing. It should not be made easier by facilitating infection.
:::How often is an entry point deserted for many hours in an area where the TRPs are even active?  You seem to want to have it both ways with your objection, when it comes to lying in wait nearly dead and infected, nobody is around, but when it's time to figure damage potential, there are victims aplenty.  Which is it?  Is the area deserted, or isn't it?  As for parachuting being a form of griefing, I disagree, and as I've said before I'm not discarding this simply because you disapprove of a certain play style or tactic. --[[User:Nuisance|Nuisance]] 02:26, 22 August 2010 (BST)
::::All I'm saying is that a guaranteed infection source, on demand, without having to hook up with a zombie pal is rather overpowered. One could simply scout out how far it would be to free run to whatever place you're going to parachute into, and then get your HP down to exactly that number, while hiding in a deserted building. If the needle had only a small chance of infecting you, with the small search rate, it wouldn't be *that* bad. But a guaranteed infection? That would just be disastrous. But if you're going to advocate parachuting as a legitimate play style and non-griefing tactic, rest assured I'm going to combat revive and ?dump your carcass faster than you can blink an eye. I just think parachuting is one of the cheapest and least realistic play styles in existence. Death Cultism, in regards to taking down barricades, destroying generators, even player killing, are all more realistic than someone "befriending" a zombie, getting it to bite them without it eating their brains, and then knowing exactly when one is going to succumb to the virus, and jumping into a building at that exact moment. There's my two cents, spend it as you will. --[[User:Warbird108|Warbird108]] 06:00, 22 August 2010 (BST)
---
 
===Blood Injection===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' 5:17AM PDT
|-
|'''Type:''' New
|-
|'''Scope:''' Scientist
|-
|'''Description:''' The scientist is able to deal 50% of the zombie's lv as damage, after requiring a new item (perhaps you can also add it to in-game) blood pack & needle. possibly from necro-labs and hospitals making it 20%chance of finding it? or maybe after you get necro-net access or lab experience just maybe?
|}
====Discussion (Blood Injection)====
This skill is massively overpowered and stupid.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 13:53, 16 August 2010 (BST)
:+1 million {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 16:22, 16 August 2010 (BST)
 
Like the concept, and I like the idea of half the zombie's level, but too imba. Would suggest damage equal to half the zombies level '''but only their zombie skills''' so the maximum damage they can do is, say 10. And even then you need a chance factor, it can't have 100% hit rate etc. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:59, 16 August 2010 (BST)
:I don't see how any scientist is going to have time to inject a zombie with enough blood to make this sort of difference. Combat revives (ie against unwilling injectees) are stretching credulity already, I just don't see this happening in role-play terms.--{{User:Mallrat/sig}} 19:26, 16 August 2010 (BST)
 
Even if it had been typed in English, this would still be monumentally stupid. --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 06:14, 17 August 2010 (BST)
 
Why would injecting a zombie with blood damage it? After all, their ''raison d'etre'' is to slurp on our brainz. <span style="font-family: Segoe Script, Comic Sans MS, sans-serif;text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.4em">[[User:Chief Seagull|<span style="color: green;">Chief&nbsp;Seagull</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Chief Seagull|<small>squawk</small>]]</span><sup>[http://chzgifs.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/parkour_sg.gif ''Free running!''</sup>] 15:22, 20 August 2010 (BST)
:''"lool dood, ima gunna inject som blood in this zombi, an it'l like, asplode." "Couldn't we just shoot it?" "No way dood, that does like no damag at all compered to putting blood in em."''--{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 05:07, 21 August 2010 (BST)
----
----


===Who barricaded?===
===Backpack===
{|
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Zamins|Zamins]] 01:29, 12 August 2010 (BST)
|'''Timestamp:''' [[User:Wild Crazy|Wild Crazy]] ([[User talk:Wild Crazy|talk]]) 20:55, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
|-
|-
|'''Type:''' Not sure
|'''Type:''' New item
|-
|-
|'''Scope:''' Survivors
|'''Scope:''' Survivors
|-
|-
|'''Description:''' What I propose is that when we are in the building and the barricade level is raised, like from VSB to HB, that we are able to see who barricaded it, and when. For example:
|'''Description:''' This will be a new item found in schools with a 2% find rate and sports stores with a 4% find rate. The low numbers are because, like a flak jacket, once you find it you have it forever. It increases you encumbrance by 30%. However, you can't use an item that is in your backpack until you remove it from the backpack. It costs one AP to add an item to your backpack and one AP to remove an item. An item affects your regular encumbrance until added to the backpack. Items such as GPS, radios, cell phones, and flak jacket do not work when in your backpack. Items in your backpack will not be shown in your inventory, but the backpack itself will be shown in your inventory. There will be a drop box next to the word backpack that shows all the items inside. When you click on an item in that drop box, it removes it from your backpack (1 AP).


Person A raises building A's barricading level from heavily barricaded to very heavily barricaded. Those in the room would see "Person A raised the barricading level from heavily barricaded to very heavily barricaded." This would allow survivors to see if someone over-barricades. Plus if someone barricaded in real life you would see them do it.
|}
====Discussion (Who barricaded?)====
Up in the sky! It's a bird! It's a plane! It's Spamoman!{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 01:33, 12 August 2010 (BST)


Nononononononono. This would hurt culting. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:34, 12 August 2010 (BST)
Q: Wouldn't this buff survivors, since they can carry more bullets and kill more zombies?


I don't quite understand what you guys are talking about. Are you being sarcastic? Are you expressing like or dislike for this idea? --[[User:Zamins|Zamins]] 01:46, 12 August 2010 (BST)
A: Since it costs an AP to add and remove an item, it wastes a lot of AP to put bullet clips in your backpack if you are planning on using them right away.
:I'm seriously expressing dislike for this, as the small benefit it gives to survivor play is far smaller than the detriment it would provide to [[death culting]]. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:50, 12 August 2010 (BST)
::Death cultists effect Survivor spawns. And life cultists can not effect Zombie spawns. And most of the over barricading is from level 2s with construction. It's completely fair. Death cultists can still PK, knock down barricades, GK, PK, and other things. --[[User:Zamins|Zamins]] 01:54, 12 August 2010 (BST)
:::Actually, with effective ZKing, life cultists can provide a valuable asset to survivors. Yes, you're right that they can't affect spawning, but spawn-blocking is among the lowest of priorities to be concerned with in the course of play. Also, regardless of what remains after option X, Y or Z is removed, unless a suggestion has a significant positive impact, either across the board or in terms of aiding unpowered aspects of the game, then it's unlikely that it will pass if it hinders another play style - in essence, you're not going to find huge support for a suggestion that gives with one hand and takes with the other unless it provides a balance, rather than widening a gulf. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:01, 12 August 2010 (BST)
:::''affects''. *adds name to Hit List under English Language Abusers* {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 18:06, 17 August 2010 (BST)
::::[http://xkcd.com/326/ The voices commanded me to link that] --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 18:10, 17 August 2010 (BST)
If it's a low priority why not be able to stamp it out? And lets see, if a zombie ZKs a zombie that can scent it and kill it. And access their profile to warn their group and they will be KOS, however the same with death cultists though. This is a small nerf for death cultists, and a small benefit for pro survivors. --[[User:Zamins|Zamins]] 02:07, 12 August 2010 (BST)


I'd support it. Overbarricading mainly harms newbies, and I feel this would be more of use for educating stupid survivors rather than a hindrance for death cultists which make themselves high visibility targets already simply by killing another survivor. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 02:09, 12 August 2010 (BST)


As a former Death Cultist I can honestly say overcading saves you more then you realize. Think about it like this, you make a building VSB so people can enter it, this makes the cades lower and makes it easier for zombies to break them down, by making them EHB death cultists cause more zombies to waste AP on barricade levels. This aside think for a second if your using it for an entrance point so are PKer's and revived cultists, if this is no longer a viable entrance point then they are also left out on the streets and thus doomed to be eaten. Granted death cultists are perfectly okay with being eaten by zombies, PKer's prefer to shoot their victims rather then be dinner.
Q: If it wastes AP, what is the point?
Also I don't want my feed spammed with useless crap like that. --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 02:10, 12 August 2010 (BST)
:Up in the sky! It's a bird! It's a plane! It's Spamoman! Also dupe.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 02:18, 12 August 2010 (BST)


If it saves us more then, why can't we see who did it so we could thank them? Also, there's already an option to ignore all barricading messages. --[[User:Zamins|Zamins]] 02:14, 12 August 2010 (BST)
A: It will be useful if you want to carry around an extra stash of items, such as FAKs and Revivification Syringes, or if you are going far away from any resource buildings and need some extra supplies.
:A:Why bother? B: What about Joe Newbie who overcades on accident and then you kill him for it? --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 02:17, 12 August 2010 (BST)


A: So we can educate newbies who overcade. B: As I've said, we'd educate the newbies.


Re: Colonel and Whitehouse - pinatas are frequently constructed stage by stage, and often by multiple people. The person cading need not be the cultist that shoots and mauls and ruins, and removing the element of stealth from this operation simply to spam the alerts feed is needlessly nerfing it. It's not about simple overcading (which the educated cultist will only use to deny rot revives or prepare a multi-block structure for pinata-ing, not as a tactic in and of itself). {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:18, 12 August 2010 (BST)
Please give your thoughts.
:I don't understand your pinata example, specifically how this would damage the stealth element of that type of operation. Pinatas are one of the types of operation where all witnesses will have to be eliminated anyway, thus leaving the overcading till after the killing should preserve the stealth element. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 03:21, 12 August 2010 (BST)
::They can be quite AP intensive, so I've often run them with one person cading, and others, often the more notorious and therefore with less to worry about with detection, splitting the killing. Keeping the cading conspirator out of logs is useful and I don't like the idea of it being nullified as a tactic for no net gain for the game. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 03:24, 12 August 2010 (BST)


You do know there's an option to turn off barricading messages already... Right? --[[User:Zamins|Zamins]] 02:23, 12 August 2010 (BST)
:Which means everyone turns them off, which means this is a useless update.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 20:08, 12 August 2010 (BST)
::As a VSB hospital administrator I'd keep them on so I'd know who was overcading.  You could turn off the messages if you wanted.  Not useless at all. --[[User:Elingold|Elingold]] 20:31, 12 August 2010 (BST)
:::Well, just to prove my point, I'd find your hospital, take the cades to VSB+2 and repeatedly add and remove levels of the cades all day. You'd quickly get the point.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 20:56, 12 August 2010 (BST)
::::And if you continued to deny access to the hospital by overcading against the barricade policy and thus put patients and interns at risk, our fine security personnel would invite you to move to another facility :) --[[User:Elingold|Elingold]] 07:51, 13 August 2010 (BST)
No. For grieifing's sake. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 03:30, 12 August 2010 (BST)
Yes Please! Running a teaching hospital at VSB can be such a pain when people keep cading.  Many don't understand what they are doing or why it's bad.  I'd be nice just to tell them what they are doing and why it hurts the new people
--[[User:Elingold|Elingold]] 05:13, 12 August 2010 (BST)
:It's nice when people put rational reasons for their dis/liking an idea rather than the usual "w00t I've been playing for years and answer with zany responses" type crap .. getting fed up with elitists around here. This game is as much for new players as it is anyone else. I like this idea, and see it is a simple inclusion. It may be possible to damage a genny with no one seeing you in a room, but to actually add large desks etc to a barricade? Na, that would stand out. Yes, I know, realism isn't paramount in this game, but this is a good inclusion - --[[User:Axemaniac johnson|Axemaniac johnson]] 19:39, 12 August 2010 (BST)
Maybe just one message gets triggered when going past VSB++, much like the message you get warning that more barricading will result in survivors not being able to enter the building.  That would reduce the screen spam to a single message when the building goes over VSB++. Something like "Jonny drags a desk over the entry point closing off access to the building"  --[[User:Elingold|Elingold]] 20:47, 12 August 2010 (BST)
That's a good idea. I like it, it's less spammy then mine :P. --[[User:Zamins|Zamins]] 22:52, 12 August 2010 (BST)
:I prefer this alt idea also. Speaking as a relative newb - only been playing since I found the site link on Zombieland - getting trapped outside buildings that according to burb maps were supposed to be entered was a drag.  I understand the concept of griefing, but if you continuously make it too hard for newbs to play, they'll quit.  Then all you'll have is a slowly dwindling supply of hardcores and the game will die from lack of fresh meat.  To paraphrase the Riddler,if you kill them too much, they won't learn nothing.--[[User:Sasha belle|Sasha belle]] 02:45, 14 August 2010 (BST)
Why has no one provided the dupe links yet? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:47, 15 August 2010 (BST)
:'cause I'm lazy. Spontanously, I'd have [[Suggestion:20080403_Who_the_heck_is_overcading%3F!|that]] and [[Suggestion:20070704_Barricade_Alerts|that]]. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 21:25, 15 August 2010 (BST)
::God bless you. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 21:29, 15 August 2010 (BST)
Yeah but those are closed. --[[User:Zamins|Zamins]] 21:33, 15 August 2010 (BST)
:And?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 21:41, 15 August 2010 (BST)
::I understand the frustration of duplicates for those who monitor the wiki day in-day out, but are dupes, never, ever allowed to be reconsidered? Even if the game and its players have changed somewhat over the last 5 years?--{{User:Mallrat/sig}} 09:21, 16 August 2010 (BST)
:::Nope, never. Stupid, but that's how it works.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 09:24, 16 August 2010 (BST)
::::Sure they can. If the game has changed, then that means that the context of the suggestion has changed. Just cite the dupe in the summary and point out why it is different (the context). That said, I'm pretty sure this one has been duped recently, and it's not an idea most people like, I think, since screen spam is...ugh. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 09:36, 16 August 2010 (BST)
:::::yeah, we tend to be pretty easy on it now (compared to when suggestions were made like every day), if you believe it's different because of the context and say it in the suggestion, well, usually that's more than enough for the userbase who are voting. {{unsigned|DanceDanceRevolution|09:54, 16 August 2010 (BST)}}
'''Dupe''' de doop de dewp. (''Ad nauseum'', to boot.) {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 18:09, 17 August 2010 (BST)
:It's a dupe because it's a good idea.  If one message gets sent going over vsb++, and only one that cuts down the screen spam.  Also you can choose to ignore those messages, so the screen spam argument doesn't have much merit.  As for the griefers boo hoo.  This change would help newbies and those dedicated to helping newbies, which has to be good for the long term growth of this game.  Also with the addition of safe houses things have changed.  You could link the notification to the safehouse only, so you'd know when someone was messing with your 'site lines'.  I see no reason why this can't be reconsidered.  It's such a minor thing that would make a huge difference for teaching hospitals/PDs and entry point maintenance.  --[[User:Elingold|Elingold]] 19:01, 17 August 2010 (BST)
----
===Shorter Radio Code===
{|
|'''Timestamp:''' --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 05:27, 11 August 2010 (BST)
|-
|'''Type:''' Code simplification
|-
|'''Scope:''' Radio whores
|-
|'''Description:''' Now, a radio is represented in the inventory's string of code as BXXXX, where XXXX defines the frequency. However, the frequency indefinably starts with 2. Thus, you could say the code is B2XXX. But why bother having the 2 there at all? All it does is take up an extra character of code, and since each inventory can only have 50 characters of it, that means that it's lowering the potential space by something other than encumbrance. If the 2 was thrown out altogether, and all radios assumed to be on 2X.XX MHz, then it would save more space. You could have 12.5 radios, rather than just 10.
|}
|}
====Discussion (Shorter Radio Code)====
====Discussion (Backpack)====
''and since each inventory can only have 50 characters of it, that means that it's lowering the potential space by something other than encumbrance.'' - I have no idea what this means. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 05:36, 11 August 2010 (BST)
:Yeah, is there some documentation for this or something? I'm sure that many people's inventories go over 50 characters. Just think of how many letters there are in "shotgun shell" ^.^{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 05:43, 11 August 2010 (BST)
::Only one. r. I suppose I should link to [[item codes|this]]. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 05:58, 11 August 2010 (BST)
:::So, to be clear on this, you're saying that there is another statistic in the game besides encumbrance which dictates how many items we can carry? And that the statistic is based on the number of characters in the code that represents the items we carry? To me, that sounds more like something that should be put up on [[Bug Reports]], since it isn't an obvious feature of the game. If anything, slap it up there and ask that he increase it from VARCHAR(50) to VARCHAR(100) or something in the database. Problem solved without all of this complicated stuff. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:10, 11 August 2010 (BST)
::::The slot limit only matters if you're holding multiple radios. Otherwise, it has no effect. The character limit could be increased to 125, however. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 06:25, 11 August 2010 (BST)
:::::Why only radios? From the description on that page, it sounds to me like it could affect any item which has a code with a length greater than half its encumbrance. Radios are certainly the worst offender, but I would imagine they are by no means the only one. And all of this is based on conjecture anyway. If he built the database using a 3NF design, which is standard practice when dealing with RMDB, then it wouldn't be stored that way at all, which would render all of this discussion moot. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:45, 11 August 2010 (BST)
::::::It also applies to candy and Christmas lights, yeah. I have no clue clue what your fancy abbreviations mean, though. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 06:53, 11 August 2010 (BST)
:::::::RDMB = Relational Model Database (e.g. mySQL, Oracle, etc.), 3NF = Third Normal Form (which will take a really long time to explain if you don't know what it means...I'd suggest taking a databases course at a local college or else finding some references). Long story short, storing it in the way suggested by that article goes against 3NF, and 3NF is the generally-preferred way of organizing the tables in a database due to the various properties of the design. Assuming he set it up in 3NF, then none of this discussion matters in the least, since the conjectures in that article would be incorrect. I'm not saying they are, however, just that they ''would'' be, assuming he followed standard practices. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 08:14, 11 August 2010 (BST)
::::::::You're forgetting one important thing about Kevan: He's a programmer, not a DBA. And Laziness is one of the Three Assets of a Programmer. <tt>;)</tt> {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 20:01, 17 August 2010 (BST)
 
I'm not sure that is correct. I seem to recall Red have in surplus of 20 pumpkins as well as his regular inventory, and so I'd think that would go over the 50 limit, if that was the case. Also, I don't think a suggestion should be based on an article of maybes as its only reasoning.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 11:49, 11 August 2010 (BST)
:The post-encumbrance [[inventory string]] limit was experimentally determined to be <s>400</s> '''100''' characters with the aid of [[crate]] drop scavenging and verified by multiple persons on multiple characters. I was sure I updated the relevant page… {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 19:56, 17 August 2010 (BST)
::So basically this shouldn't be a problem unless you go out of your way to go over the encumb. limit?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2‎}} 20:05, 17 August 2010 (BST)
:::Yup. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 21:00, 17 August 2010 (BST)
::::I tried this a couple of years ago.  I had a character who spent most of its time as a zombie but wanted to listen to as many radio broadcasts as possible.  Zombies can't retune radios so the only way to do it is to collect and tune as many radios as possible while alive.  I managed to pick up 16 radios.  If each takes 5 slots that adds up to 81 slots (if you add 1 for the flak jacket I was carrying.)  Maybe the limit has increased since then? --[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1173594 your anal slut wife] 12:15, 20 August 2010 (BST)
::Sorry, that should be '''[[Bug Reports/Archive3#Encumberance/Item Max? + Crates = Equipment Loss|100]]'''. Inaccurate information fixed. (We should probably add this to the relevant page(s).) {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 18:58, 26 August 2010 (BST)
----
----
==Suggestions up for voting==
===[[Suggestion:20100814 'Search X Times' Dropdown Box]]===
Gone to voting. All DS discussion has been moved to the suggestion [[Suggestion talk:20100814 'Search X Times' Dropdown Box|talk page]]. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:56, 16 August 2010 (BST)

Latest revision as of 17:27, 8 July 2024

NOTICE
The Suggestions system has been closed indefinitely and Developing Suggestions is no longer functions as a part of the suggestions process.

However, you are welcome to use this page for general discussion on suggestions.

Suggestion Navigation
Suggestion Portal
Current Suggestions • Suggestions up for Voting • Clothes Suggestions
Cycling Suggestions • Peer Reviewed • Undecided • Peer Rejected • Humorous
Suggestion Advice • Topics to Avoid and Why • Help, Developing and Editing

Developing Suggestions

This section is for general discussion of suggestions for the game Urban Dead.

It also includes the capacity to pitch suggestions for conversation and feedback.

Further Discussion

  • Discussion concerning this page takes place here.
  • Discussion concerning the suggestions system in general, including policies about it, takes place here.

Resources

How To Make a Discussion

Adding a New Discussion

To add a general discussion topic, please add a Tier 3 Header (===Example===) below, with your idea or proposal.


Adding a New Suggestion

  • Paste the copied text above the other suggestions, right under the heading.
  • Substitute the text in RED CAPITALS with the details of your suggestion.
  • The process is illustrated in this image.
{{subst:DevelopingSuggestion
|time=~~~~
|name=SUGGESTION NAME
|type=TYPE HERE
|scope=SCOPE HERE
|description=DESCRIPTION HERE
}}
  • Name - Give the suggestion a short but descriptive name.
  • Type is the nature of the suggestion, such as a new class, skill change, balance change.
  • Scope is who or what the suggestion affects. Typically survivors or zombies (or both), but occasionally Malton, the game interface or something else.
  • Description should be a full explanation of your suggestion. Include information like flavor text, search odds, hit percentages, etc, as appropriate. Unless you are as yet unsure of the exact details behind the suggestion, try not to leave out anything important. Check your spelling and grammar.

Cycling Suggestions

  • Suggestions with no new discussion in the past month may be cycled without notice.


Please add new discussions and suggestions to the top of the list


Ignore based on Radio Broadcast

Timestamp: Khwud (talk) 17:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Type: UI enhancement
Scope: Interface
Description: Allow 'ignore' from radio broadcasts; users are hiding behind their anonymity to allow them to broadcast things that would broadly trigger them to be ignored, if their user ID was visible. Adding their name, or an auto-generated call-sign (it is for a radio, after all) or something so that they could be blocked based on their broadcasts would help user experience. In addition, and broadcasts that get more than a threshold number could get tagged for review, and the user potentially having their (in-game) ham-license revoked.

Discussion (Ignore based on Radio Broadcast)

Shrink the map

Timestamp: --UroguyTMZ 16:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Type: Map change
Scope: Everyone
Description: There are just over 3000 active characters in the game currently likely counting a significant percentage of alts and zergs. Shrinking the map by eliminating the outer first two rings of suburbs would increase the amount of interactions between the remaining characters. This shrink could be increased or decreased depending on future changes to the playerbase.

Discussion (Shrink the map)

Action Points

Timestamp: User:Wolldog1 10:07, 26 July 26, 2022
Type: Action Points Increase Regeneration Rate
Scope: Everyone
Description: Due to the passage of time with mobile games and other real time action games without restriction, I think that we should address the action points system of the game. This game can only realistically be played for 5 minutes a day. So it's not really a seller for new blood. If we want to see this game survive it needs to evolve into something more exciting than 5 minutes. My suggestion is double the regeneration rate to improve activity. I love this game. I want to play it more. And the die hard fans I'm sure feel the same. More will go on in a day, sure. But that's for both sides. We're ready for it. Let's get this game moving again. We need this.

Discussion (Action Points)

Drone

Timestamp: RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 19:10, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Type: Survivor Item
Scope: Survivors
Description: Portable drone, found in mall tech stores, which are pointless as we all know. Encumbrance is 10%. When activated for 15ap they provide an image of a 10x10 grid centred on the survivor, showing the current outside status of all blocks including zombies, survivors and dead bodies. Like DNA scanners, Drones are multi use.

Discussion (Drone)

Would there be a message displayed to the players to the effect of "there's a drone buzzing overhead", similar to a flare? --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 02:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Backpack

Timestamp: Wild Crazy (talk) 20:55, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Type: New item
Scope: Survivors
Description: This will be a new item found in schools with a 2% find rate and sports stores with a 4% find rate. The low numbers are because, like a flak jacket, once you find it you have it forever. It increases you encumbrance by 30%. However, you can't use an item that is in your backpack until you remove it from the backpack. It costs one AP to add an item to your backpack and one AP to remove an item. An item affects your regular encumbrance until added to the backpack. Items such as GPS, radios, cell phones, and flak jacket do not work when in your backpack. Items in your backpack will not be shown in your inventory, but the backpack itself will be shown in your inventory. There will be a drop box next to the word backpack that shows all the items inside. When you click on an item in that drop box, it removes it from your backpack (1 AP).


Q: Wouldn't this buff survivors, since they can carry more bullets and kill more zombies?

A: Since it costs an AP to add and remove an item, it wastes a lot of AP to put bullet clips in your backpack if you are planning on using them right away.


Q: If it wastes AP, what is the point?

A: It will be useful if you want to carry around an extra stash of items, such as FAKs and Revivification Syringes, or if you are going far away from any resource buildings and need some extra supplies.


Please give your thoughts.

Discussion (Backpack)

Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=Developing_Suggestions&oldid=2433158"