Talk:Oedipus Wrecks: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 20:22, 9 November 2012

A Contradiction

"Zergs need not apply." I'm sure that pretty much means this group's actual membership number is zero. Plenty of evidence to go around that you took advantage of zergs. Plenty of evidence indeed. Go ahead and remove this. This'll be easily dug up from the history tab anyways, with it being the first edit and all. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{^{^{^{^{#nerftemplatedsigs}}}}} 08:36, 31 March 2012 (BST)

The Accurate Depiction

Now why would we bother to delete this when it's so obviously sour grapes? You got beat...you cry zerg...and you think this reflects on us? No, Axe, we will leave your clumsy, transparent excuses entirely unmolested as a monument to your colossal dipshititude. Regrettably, we can't say the same about your mom.

Paid for by the Committee to Point and Laugh at the Painfully Butthurt

--Natasha Fatale

23:40, 31 March 2012 (BST)

Just wanted to say

Love the name. Ladies. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 16:46, 2 July 2012 (BST)

Ahem

"Currently in Chancelwood and Earltown where we have claimed Haslock NT after 5 days. Still holding the NT and delivering brains to the ferals courtesy of our Chez Wrecks outreach program" should be changed to "Currently in the streets of Chancelwood after our ejection from Haslock NT. From outside we are gazing, mystified, at the lights within, perplexed by the sounds of partying and drinking and bewildered by the sweet smell of baking pies."
YW!! :D Marcel Swann 17:53, 11 July 2012 (BST)

The Malton Rangers popped by our page to say hello, delightful! Marcel, thanks for the reminder to update the front page. Of course, it's gonna be tricky keeping the status update fresh considering all the rapid changes in Haslock's status now that you all have arrived. We really enjoyed the DWO drunken revelry for about 12 hours last night before being shown the door. I suppose it goes without saying that you won't be able to keep the OW gals out so long as that tasty Det. Briscoe is inside! Now... whose idea was it to denote Haslock NT as safe? *looks bemused* Stay classy! --Natasha Fatale

02:30, 13 July 2012 (BST)

Ah, sorry about that eviction, but it turns out that murdering our friends and allies in front of our eyes is a violation of the rental agreement! Now as for Haslock's designation as safe, that was me, and it might just be this fifth of Jack Daniels talking, but I myself feel safe as houses! (by the way, medical studies show that drinking a fifth of Jack every day reduces awareness of zombie attacks by over 90%. True fact.) Having been alerted that OW gals are on their way, Det Briscoe is attempting to pick the locks with his teeth on the chastity belt we make him wear during full moons. Don't be strangers! :D Marcel Swann 03:42, 13 July 2012 (BST)

Ah ah ah! It's only murder if you're not fighting back. :) --Penguinpyro - 04:27, 13 July 2012 (BST)

There's really only one way to settle this Haslock thing. Mud wrestling. Our best gal vs yours. Fortunately, I happen to also hold an advance degree from the Paul E. Shore Academy of Umpiring and would be honored to officiate. My resume is fairly extensive. Det Briscoe 04:30, 14 July 2012 (BST)

Hmmm, the old I'm-a-degreed-mudwrestling-officiant story, eh? I'm not fallin' for that...again!--Natasha Fatale

06:13, 14 July 2012 (BST)

In that case...have you seen my Nobel Peace Prize? Det Briscoe 00:54, 15 July 2012 (BST)

Umm, Det, does winka know what you're volunteering her for?Marcel Swann 16:58, 18 July 2012 (BST)

Pffff...winka could take any two of 'em with one hand tied behind her back and a jug of Burgundy's best duct taped to her other.. Det Briscoe 17:54, 18 July 2012 (BST)

Did I die? Is this heaven? -- Marcel Swann 19:10, 18 July 2012 (BST)

Nope, you're just dreaming in an easily retaken Haslock. I won't wake you. Det Briscoe 19:23, 18 July 2012 (BST)

That was pretty easy, wasn't it? I thought it was just me. -- Marcel Swann 19:45, 18 July 2012 (BST)

It could well be. Someone mentioned to them that you'd be returning to Haslock in full Swann gladiatrix regalia. Talk about Oedipal trainwrecks.....Det Briscoe 00:58, 19 July 2012 (BST)

I had to google "gladiatrix". And yes, I can see how that would cause OW to run away in terror. Unfortunately, we cannot ask them, as they are nowhere in sight. -- Marcel Swann 23:09, 19 July 2012 (BST)

The Bill for Your MCM Buffet

"Excuse me! Can one of you very stuffed zombies point out Natasha Fatale? I have the buffet bill here for her, tip included of course! You all had quite the feast and we would hate to see you all slip out before paying the bill. *winks* If you know what I mean...

Seriously though, excellent attack and delivery! I haven't seen that good of an attack since well the good old days of the RRF. *wipes a tear from her eye* Just a beatiful thing to behold....Hats off to you all Oedipus Wrecks!

sets down the bill and starts to back off through the door* I'll just come back for this after desert..."
--QBee 17:29, 15 August 2012 (BST)

Thanks. --Natasha Fatale

04:48, 19 August 2012 (BST)

Who's your father?

EXECUTE ORDER 66

Everything is proceeding exactly as I have foreseen.

~ _{06:33, 7 November 2012 (UTC)}

--Natasha Fatale 20:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 :Now why would we bother to delete this when it's so obviously sour grapes?  You got beat...you cry zerg...and you think this reflects on us?  No, Axe, we will leave your clumsy, transparent excuses entirely unmolested as a monument to your colossal dipshititude.  Regrettably, we can't say the same about your mom.<br>
 :[[File:Girls laughing with facepalm.png|Paid for by the Committee to Point and Laugh at the Painfully Butthurt]]--{{User:Natasha Fatale/Sig}} 23:40, 31 March 2012 (BST) <!--It's true, we took advantage of Axe's mom, but be fair, she promised to feed us after!-->
-::I'm not sure if ya pwned Axe so definitively why the remainder of the comments are now gone.  However, didn't you attack CAPD when you were still the Orange Brigade?  I, unlike Axe, was there and don't recall a single Oedipus Wrecks tag.  So, why are you claiming ownership of an attack a different group accomplished?  I also seem to remember OB was a PKer group, who resorted to zombie attacks due to an inability to stay alive.  But, perhaps, my memory is faulty.  --[[Image:Kirsty_Cotton_Header.png|60px|Open the Box|link=User:Kirsty_cotton]] <sub>[[Organization_XIII|<span style="color: grey">Org XIII</span>]]</sub> <sup>[[User:Kirsty_cotton/alts|<span style="color: blue">Alts</span>]]</sup> 13:36, 1 July 2012 (BST)
-:::The comments are removed because this page is not meant to be a forum for Axe's efforts to twist the facts to support his smear campaign against yet another group.  You did not see Oedipus Wrecks tags because at the time we did not have a name at all.  We never limited ourselves to solely pking and in fact use whatever life status suits our resources and strategy at a given time.  That is what is commonly known as death culting.  You saw the OB tags because three of our members were previously in what could loosely be called a group they identified as Orange Brigade (they have no wiki, no irc and are really just 3 buddies who occasionally brought there alts together to play a bit.)  I saw no reason to have them change that because I am not always in the business of making it easy for my opponents to identify us. It is your hunter group that failed to stack many claims not OW who couldn't get or stay alive if that is what we wanted, Kirsty. You were there, you saw us controlling the state of the real estate surrounding CAPD's HQ and you saw that we stomped them and the allies they called in for assistance. And we'll do it again...perhaps CAPD and your collection of hunters have forgotten how we dominated that area and require a refresher course? Spoiler Alert:  3 zergs outside of any building they occupy will not protect them from us.--{{User:Natasha Fatale/Sig}} 17:14, 1 July 2012 (BST)
-::::I'm pretty sure there were more than 3 OB tags, but that's fine.  If your goal was to dominate the area though, I'm afraid you failed.  You did a good job ruining CAPD and a couple of surrounding buildings, as any zombie group with sufficient numbers and coordination could. I would have thought you understand how the survivor/zombie dynamic works, but if you think that's something special; good for you. --[[Image:Kirsty_Cotton_Header.png|60px|Open the Box|link=User:Kirsty_cotton]] <sub>[[Organization_XIII|<span style="color: grey">Org XIII</span>]]</sub> <sup>[[User:Kirsty_cotton/alts|<span style="color: blue">Alts</span>]]</sup> 19:51, 1 July 2012 (BST)
-:::::No, Kirsty, there were never more than 3 of us with the OB tags and it's fine that you can acknowledge that (or provide some evidence to the contary...you were paying close attention right?  You did look at all of our profiles and can provide proof of what you imply, yes?  Ohhhh, right...you can't because it didn't happen that way.  *grins*  And, c'mon, Kirsty, we both know it wasn't "a couple" buildings, yes?  We ''dominated'' the 15 building area connected via free running lanes to Crew Ave PD (CAPD's designated HQ.)  The part of the suburb CAPD values most was ours so long as we wanted it and your silly hunters could do little to stop us.  LOL.  It's okay, we'll give you another shot at it soon.  You're probably gonna wanna bring help though!. LOL.--{{User:Natasha Fatale/Sig}} 23:23, 1 July 2012 (BST)
-::[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:Oedipus_Wrecks&diff=prev&oldid=2009568 You're arguing with a forensic science major.] Do you honestly think I'll argue something without [http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/6307/evidencea.jpg evidence]? Censored because I know the importance of witness protection. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 13:48, 1 July 2012 (BST)
-:::I am effectively defending against a lying incompetent who seems to think claiming to be a student in something gives him credibility even as he misinterprets the facts to suit his own bias, LOL.  So lemme break it down to you like a teacher might...watch and learn, Grasshopper. You have provided a subjective declaration, specifically an erroneous assumption that you (a non-witness) made (and put quotes around) saying that OW took advantage of a residential zerg and then you ''called it evidence.''  You have further provided a declaration made by CZ (who was a witness with an alt in the OW crew though that alt's initials are not CZ) saying that ''we did not coordinate with the zergs but that any time OW and Spandy were together was "just a coincidence."'' Her statement that "we did not know they were there" means we did not know of the Spandys' presence until we arrived at the operation and did not select our targets based on their movements.  I am confident that CZ does not mean to suggest that I kept secret from the crew any facts once I learned them. I'm sure that you can ask CZ to clarify the meaning but I suspect we both understand the meaning intended to be conveyed.  This is just more of your twisting things to support your trolling. The most common form of evidence is the testimony of witnesses. A witness can be a person who actually viewed the events at issue and as your chat shows she states that OW did not move based on when the zergs moved but when our alts were already gathered after striking with alts in another group (that was well away from the OW area of operation.) The "pattern" you say is made of "many" coincidences is actually not a pattern taken from the whole operation (which lasted 7 weeks) but from a small fraction of the time we spent in Faulkes Village, specifically the 2 or 3 days that we targeted the Crew Ave PD.  Neither CZ or I are lying, you are taking the events of 2 or 3 days in a 7 week operation and calling it a pattern while ignoring the 46 or so days we were not striking at the same target or time as Spandy.  You have also conveniently ignored the fact that spandy almost exclusively targets the Crew Ave PD and that the occasion you are observing was the time when both CAPD and ACC had piled most of their members within it.  We attacked there ''because that is where CAPD determined the standoff would be.''  We do not believe that 3 zergs focused on the same target every day should prevent us from attacking our opponents especially when our opponents were the ones who chose to station themselves there. I guess your forensic science program hasn't explained the part about the importance of looking at the full picture presented by the observable facts and reliable witness testimony when deducing the way events unfold, huh, axe?  Glad I could be of assistance.--{{User:Natasha Fatale/Sig}} 17:38, 1 July 2012 (BST)
-::::Stop [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Talk:Oedipus_Wrecks&diff=next&oldid=2009559 contradicting yourself].
-{{Quote|Natasha Fatale|Everyone knows that PD is Spandrite's (almost) exclusive target, so any work done there is gonna see a little spandy zerg action...}}
+== Just wanted to say ==
-You stated it yourself. So it's obvious you had knowledge of CAPD's zerg problems before the fact. But you just said that you did not have any knowledge until after the fact. Babs, lemme tell you one thing. Contradictions don't help your case. Nor does the lack of evidence. You want to argue a case? Show me the evidence. Oh, and FYI, Crew Avenue Police Department is not the only building the Spandies target. FYI2, I didn't continue this. You continued it with your late reply. This topic was perfectly dead until you sprang it right back to life. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 19:12, 1 July 2012 (BST)
+Love the name. Ladies. {{;)}} {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 16:46, 2 July 2012 (BST)
-::I stated quite clearly that [CZ's} statement that "we did not know they were there" means we did not know of the Spandys' presence until we arrived in the operation zone and did not select our targets based on their movements. You do know that Faulkes Village is hardly a suburb of great interest, right?  I mean nobody is studying events there until they actually have an interest in operating there, right?  Do you need it drawn in crayon, little man?  That means once in the area, we learned of the presence of three zergs known as various versions of Spandrite name.  ''We did not and do not consider the presence of a handful of zergs a valid reason to stop aggressions against an opponent'' (mostly because if we used the presence of a handful of zergs as criteria to preclude an area of operation, few if any areas would be available.)  That is not a contradiction...regardless of your desire to twist it into one.  It is a clear description of what was known when and what our response was to gaining that intel.  Furthermore, I stated that "Spandy ''almost exclusively targets the Crew Ave PD''."  That means, faithful reader of limited comprehension, that on rare occasions, Spandy may target alternatives (but mostly it's Crew Ave PD.)  Please provide evidence to the contrary (including screenshots) of Spandy focusing on buildings other than Crew Ave PD.  What?  You can't provide screenies of any month in which they were focused on some other building besides Crew Ave PD?  Can you provide a series of screens showing them targeting another building...say...10 days out of 30?  How about 5 days out of 30?  Maybe, just maybe, you have evidence of their focusing on another target 5/30 days...16% of the time or more? (see this is where we see the value of the big picture, faithful reader and forensic science major.) And please, Axe, let's acknowledge what everyone knows, you started this assault on our wiki discussion page with your silly, unsubstantiated accusations,  I merely addressed the fact that you are a fact-twisting troll who can't support his accusations with objective evidence.  Wazzamata, Axe?  Why you keep hittin' yourself? Why you keep hittin' yourself?  Why you keep hittin' yourself...?--{{User:Natasha Fatale/Sig}} 23:23, 1 July 2012 (BST)
-==Group Subpages==
+== Ahem ==
-OW/posters moved to [[Oedipus Wrecks/posters]]. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 21:22, 24 May 2012 (BST)
+"Currently in Chancelwood and Earltown where we have claimed Haslock NT after 5 days. Still holding the NT and delivering brains to the ferals courtesy of our Chez Wrecks outreach program" should be changed to "Currently in the streets of Chancelwood after our ejection from Haslock NT. From outside we are gazing, mystified, at the lights within, perplexed by the sounds of partying and drinking and bewildered by the sweet smell of baking pies."<br>
-:Is there some reason the posters can't be linked as we had them?  I know you like to hang around us and touch our junk (much like your mama) but we'd prefer them to be placed as they were; I'll correct this soon if there is no reasonable objection.--{{User:Natasha Fatale/Sig}} 23:55, 7 June 2012 (BST)
+YW!! :D [[User:Marcel Swann|Marcel Swann]] 17:53, 11 July 2012 (BST)
+:The Malton Rangers popped by our page to say hello, delightful!  Marcel, thanks for the reminder to update the front page.  Of course, it's gonna be tricky keeping the status update fresh considering all the rapid changes in Haslock's status now that you all have arrived.  We really enjoyed the DWO drunken revelry for about 12 hours last night before being shown the door.  I suppose it goes without saying that you won't be able to keep the OW gals out so long as that tasty Det. Briscoe is inside! Now... whose idea was it to denote Haslock NT as safe? *looks bemused* Stay classy! --{{User:Natasha Fatale/Sig}} 02:30, 13 July 2012 (BST)<br>
+::Ah, sorry about that eviction, but it turns out that murdering our friends and allies in front of our eyes is a violation of the rental agreement! Now as for Haslock's designation as safe, that was me, and it might just be this fifth of Jack Daniels talking, but I myself feel safe as houses! (by the way, medical studies show that drinking a fifth of Jack every day reduces awareness of zombie attacks by over 90%. True fact.) Having been alerted that OW gals are on their way, Det Briscoe is attempting to pick the locks with his teeth on the chastity belt we make him wear during full moons. Don't be strangers! :D [[User:Marcel Swann|Marcel Swann]] 03:42, 13 July 2012 (BST)
+:::Ah ah ah! It's only murder if you're not fighting back. :) --[[User:RadicalWhig/Penguinpyro|Penguinpyro]] - 04:27, 13 July 2012 (BST)
+::There's really only one way to settle this Haslock thing. Mud wrestling. Our best gal vs yours. Fortunately, I happen to also hold an advance degree from the Paul E. Shore Academy of Umpiring and would be honored to officiate. My resume is fairly extensive. [[User:Det Briscoe|Det Briscoe]] 04:30, 14 July 2012 (BST)
+:::Hmmm, the old I'm-a-degreed-mudwrestling-officiant story, eh?  I'm not fallin' for that...again!--{{User:Natasha Fatale/Sig}} 06:13, 14 July 2012 (BST)
+::::In that case...have you seen my Nobel Peace Prize? [[User:Det Briscoe|Det Briscoe]] 00:54, 15 July 2012 (BST)
+:::Umm, Det, does winka know what you're volunteering her for?[[User:Marcel Swann|Marcel Swann]] 16:58, 18 July 2012 (BST)
+:::: Pffff...winka could take any two of 'em with one hand tied behind her back and a jug of Burgundy's best duct taped to her other.. [[User:Det Briscoe|Det Briscoe]] 17:54, 18 July 2012 (BST)
+:::::Did I die? Is this heaven? -- [[User:Marcel Swann|Marcel Swann]] 19:10, 18 July 2012 (BST)
+::::::Nope, you're just dreaming in an easily retaken Haslock. I won't wake you. [[User:Det Briscoe|Det Briscoe]] 19:23, 18 July 2012 (BST)
+:::::::That was pretty easy, wasn't it? I thought it was just me. -- [[User:Marcel Swann|Marcel Swann]] 19:45, 18 July 2012 (BST)
+::::::::It could well be. Someone mentioned to them that you'd be returning to Haslock in full Swann gladiatrix regalia. Talk about Oedipal trainwrecks.....[[User:Det Briscoe|Det Briscoe]] 00:58, 19 July 2012 (BST)
+:::::::::I had to google "gladiatrix". And yes, I can see how that would cause OW to run away in terror. Unfortunately, we cannot ask them, as they are nowhere in sight. -- [[User:Marcel Swann|Marcel Swann]] 23:09, 19 July 2012 (BST)
+==The Bill for Your MCM Buffet==
+"Excuse me! Can one of you very stuffed zombies point out Natasha Fatale? I have the buffet bill here for her, tip included of course! You all had quite the feast and we would hate to see you all slip out before paying the bill. *winks* If you know what I mean...
+Seriously though, excellent attack and delivery! I haven't seen that good of an attack since well the good old days of the RRF. *wipes a tear from her eye* Just a beatiful thing to behold....Hats off to you all Oedipus Wrecks!
+*sets down the bill and starts to back off through the door* I'll just come back for this after desert..."<br> --[[User:QBee|QBee]] 17:29, 15 August 2012 (BST)
+:: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzFAsYJyR60 Thanks.] --{{User:Natasha Fatale/Sig}} 04:48, 19 August 2012 (BST)
+== Who's your father? ==
+{{SoNinvite‎}} ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>06:33, 7 November 2012 (UTC)</sub>
+[[Image:Oedipus_wrecks_seeitpic.png‎]] <br>
+--{{User:Natasha Fatale/Sig}} 20:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Oedipus Wrecks: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 20:22, 9 November 2012

Contents

A Contradiction

Just wanted to say

Ahem

The Bill for Your MCM Buffet

Who's your father?

Navigation menu

Page actions

Page actions

Personal tools

General

Search

Resources

Wiki

Toolbox