UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Grim s vs Conndraka

Lulz. Conn lost no face for that ruling in the eyes of anyone who actually matters and/or wasn't adversely affected by it. --brb, church ^{DORIS CGR U!} 00:10, 29 June 2008 (BST)

pull the other one Bob, we all know that the case in question caused a shitstorm of drama, led to Grim exploiting loopholes to get around the ruling and caused a massive drop in trust of the whole arbitration system... anyone who says otherwise just wasn't here, wasn't paying attention or just would not know reality if it bit them on the ASS!--Honestmistake 02:00, 29 June 2008 (BST)

A shitstorm of drama mostly involving Grim and a few halfwits BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW'ing. A few can make a very loud noise on this wiki. --brb, church ^{DORIS CGR U!} 02:37, 29 June 2008 (BST)

Use the talk page bob, thats what its there for. --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 05:31, 29 June 2008 (BST)

This has me wondering, why the hell do you care anyway Akule, it doesn't effect you unless your goal is to abuse it in the future and it's holding up the precedent that Arbitration can make open ended cases, a precedent that will likely not be reinforced by the majority of Sysops and shouldn't.--Karek^maps?! 01:19, 18 July 2008 (BST)

Having completly forgotton about this case till I was reminded I have only one thing to say after the fact... VALIDATION. Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 19:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)