UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Grim s vs Conndraka

Lulz. Conn lost no face for that ruling in the eyes of anyone who actually matters and/or wasn't adversely affected by it. --brb, church ^{DORIS CGR U!} 00:10, 29 June 2008 (BST)

pull the other one Bob, we all know that the case in question caused a shitstorm of drama, led to Grim exploiting loopholes to get around the ruling and caused a massive drop in trust of the whole arbitration system... anyone who says otherwise just wasn't here, wasn't paying attention or just would not know reality if it bit them on the ASS!--Honestmistake 02:00, 29 June 2008 (BST)

A shitstorm of drama mostly involving Grim and a few halfwits BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW'ing. A few can make a very loud noise on this wiki. --brb, church ^{DORIS CGR U!} 02:37, 29 June 2008 (BST)

Use the talk page bob, thats what its there for. --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 05:31, 29 June 2008 (BST)

This has me wondering, why the hell do you care anyway Akule, it doesn't effect you unless your goal is to abuse it in the future and it's holding up the precedent that Arbitration can make open ended cases, a precedent that will likely not be reinforced by the majority of Sysops and shouldn't.--Karek^maps?! 01:19, 18 July 2008 (BST)

Effectively, it was because I didn't want him to come onto my page and badger me like he would other people. No hidden agenda, no nothing. I didn't mind Grim as a person, but I disliked how he used his position of authority to badger anyone who disagreed with him (new members, sysops), etc.) off of the wiki. It's a fine distinction, but one worth noting, since some people have problems with determining the difference. --Akule ^{Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™} 01:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

I can understand not wanting to deal with him, however I still don't think that's justification for wanting to abuse the arbitration system to do it. There are other ways that also happen to be more effective and less drama filled.--Karek^maps?! 00:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Having completly forgotton about this case till I was reminded I have only one thing to say after the fact... VALIDATION. Conndraka^{mod TAZM CFT} 19:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Every time I think my opinion of you can't get any worse you find a way to look even less the neutral party and even more the agenda driven mini-tyrant. You do realize that everything you dislike about Grim is reflected in you with the exception that Grim both admitted to it and knew it.--Karek^maps?! 00:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Can someone point out to me as to why you guys are still rambling 5 months later? --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC)