Talk:Umbrella Biohazard Containment Service/Umbrella: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Fail) |
Krazy Monkey (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::::::::::You haven't stopped harassing me and everything I do for 7 months, '''because''' of something that happened 7 MONTHS AGO! Fail. And asshattery. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 22:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | ::::::::::You haven't stopped harassing me and everything I do for 7 months, '''because''' of something that happened 7 MONTHS AGO! Fail. And asshattery. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 22:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::::::::: Oh God, not this again. Can you two just get a restraining order from each other? Look, let's allow both sides to have their own war pages, so that both sides can put up whatever they feel is accurate in THEIR OWN PAGE, and then we can reconcile later, once the peace talks are over. [[User:Leon Cane|Leon Cane]] 23:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | ::::::::::: Oh God, not this again. Can you two just get a restraining order from each other? Look, let's allow both sides to have their own war pages, so that both sides can put up whatever they feel is accurate in THEIR OWN PAGE, and then we can reconcile later, once the peace talks are over. [[User:Leon Cane|Leon Cane]] 23:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
== [[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration|Arbitration?]] == | |||
I strongly recommend you guys take this back to Arbitration. You've been arguing over this page for quite a while now and I personally don't want to see any more Umbrella members end up in VB. As the previous case, I would be willing to stand as arbitrator again, but the decision is entirely up to you guys. Please, seriously think about this. I don't think we need two groups completely banned from the wiki for vandalism. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 23:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:04, 9 January 2009
Fail
This article is fail. I don't know where you got the idea we claimed 23 kills but its wrong. More then 40 kills, not counting allied kills. Our Kill/death topic is 9 pages long. Yours combined is 6 pages long. William said no one of the UBCS bothered to report their deaths after a while, so your claims aren't even accurate. --Thadeous Oakley 12:51, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- I got reports that you said 23. Give me access to that topic, and I will count the screenshots. --Haliman - Talk 12:57, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- I will either accept UBCS victory (not on this page, for the actual war) or a stalemate. Decide now, because you guys sure as hell didn't beat us.--Haliman - Talk 20:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well actually, we did beat you. I am not just claiming a number, I count the kills that were reported on that topic since the start of the war. That's about 45 kills. Obviously, you claim other things. That's why this page fails. We both say other things (don't get me wrong, I am sure we won) and you can't prove my claim is incorrect, but I can't do that about your claim either.--Thadeous Oakley 21:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- So then bloody agree it's a stalemate!--Haliman - Talk 22:12, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Guess I will make our own page since this is so bloody inaccurate.-Jackson
- All I want is an agreement that it was a stalemate. Say yes, and I'll change it. --Haliman - Talk 22:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Stale mate!? Are you fucking kidding me!? We slaughtered you! Ohh you are pushing me to make decisions I want to make!-Jackson
- Pushing you? Man, make those decisions. Show everyone how immature you are! Lets face it. The only reason we aren't allies is because you are still butt hurt from something that happened 7 MONTHS AGO! Fail. --Haliman - Talk 22:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- A week ago you were trying to get me fired for something that happenend 7 MONTHS AGO! Fail.--Thadeous Oakley 22:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- You haven't stopped harassing me and everything I do for 7 months, because of something that happened 7 MONTHS AGO! Fail. And asshattery. --Haliman - Talk 22:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oh God, not this again. Can you two just get a restraining order from each other? Look, let's allow both sides to have their own war pages, so that both sides can put up whatever they feel is accurate in THEIR OWN PAGE, and then we can reconcile later, once the peace talks are over. Leon Cane 23:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- You haven't stopped harassing me and everything I do for 7 months, because of something that happened 7 MONTHS AGO! Fail. And asshattery. --Haliman - Talk 22:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- A week ago you were trying to get me fired for something that happenend 7 MONTHS AGO! Fail.--Thadeous Oakley 22:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Pushing you? Man, make those decisions. Show everyone how immature you are! Lets face it. The only reason we aren't allies is because you are still butt hurt from something that happened 7 MONTHS AGO! Fail. --Haliman - Talk 22:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Stale mate!? Are you fucking kidding me!? We slaughtered you! Ohh you are pushing me to make decisions I want to make!-Jackson
- All I want is an agreement that it was a stalemate. Say yes, and I'll change it. --Haliman - Talk 22:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Guess I will make our own page since this is so bloody inaccurate.-Jackson
- So then bloody agree it's a stalemate!--Haliman - Talk 22:12, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well actually, we did beat you. I am not just claiming a number, I count the kills that were reported on that topic since the start of the war. That's about 45 kills. Obviously, you claim other things. That's why this page fails. We both say other things (don't get me wrong, I am sure we won) and you can't prove my claim is incorrect, but I can't do that about your claim either.--Thadeous Oakley 21:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- I will either accept UBCS victory (not on this page, for the actual war) or a stalemate. Decide now, because you guys sure as hell didn't beat us.--Haliman - Talk 20:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Arbitration?
I strongly recommend you guys take this back to Arbitration. You've been arguing over this page for quite a while now and I personally don't want to see any more Umbrella members end up in VB. As the previous case, I would be willing to stand as arbitrator again, but the decision is entirely up to you guys. Please, seriously think about this. I don't think we need two groups completely banned from the wiki for vandalism. -- Cheese 23:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
