User talk:Haliman111: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Haliman111 (talk | contribs) (→Hi) |
||
Line 191: | Line 191: | ||
Just an excuse to stalk your talk page. Anyway, keep going.--{{User:Lithedarkangel/signature}} 04:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC) | Just an excuse to stalk your talk page. Anyway, keep going.--{{User:Lithedarkangel/signature}} 04:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:You should really change the color of your headings. They...like...blend in with the background! Oh no! <tt>D:</tt> {{User:Met fan/sig}} 03:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC) | :You should really change the color of your headings. They...like...blend in with the background! Oh no! <tt>D:</tt> {{User:Met fan/sig}} 03:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Can't figure out how to mass change them without color tags before and after each :( --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 03:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:15, 23 February 2009
Directions for PostingIf replying to a comment, please add a colon. ":" If replying to a reply, please add that many colons, plus one. Please sign all comments, and NO FLAMING, PLEASE! Also, remember:
MethManThe Meth Man says: Fear no zeds!! Fear no death!! Fear the Meth!! The Meth Man jumps from the window. --Lithedarkangel 00:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Drama?Funny wiki drama. Hahaha. Don't worry Hal. We do have the needles and the ammo. :) --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 02:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
This seems like the right place, anyway. Regarding the copyrighted thing. It certainly wouldn't be the first time a user in all seriousness tried to claim group stuff as copyrighted which might be why it was commented on there, Boxy has had to deal with it in the past. --Karekmaps?! 14:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Interesting... I started this bit and now a whole talk is written. Hal many people are stalking your talk page. --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 22:04, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
*Charges in a la Pedobear* Did someone say stalkage?-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 22:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Your color schemeIt hurts my eyes :) --Pestolence(talk) 03:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
The Status ReportersI commented in full har. I'll help, just give me a few days. Linkthewindow Talk 13:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Cookie
Glows?Enough glowing? --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 03:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
No more.Please, stop the wiki drama Hal. We will solve this. :) --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 19:59, 2 January 2009 (UTC) ArbitrationUmbrella have posted that they accept the arbitration and will represent themselves. I highly recommend, regardless of what others say, that you do not let this case drop and pursue it to the conclusion. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 05:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Grammatical fixThanks for fixing that up for me, I was trying to decided between "then" and "than". Language is not my strongest suit. =P - Jedaz - 03:45/16/01/2009
BDCheck your PMs on our board man. BD (i'd use my sig, but it's freaking messed up right now)
Headline textUC alliance with UBCS Dear Haliman, I am extending the hand of friendship to you from the Umbrella Corporation. I have been in talks with jackson over recent events including the repeated attacks and spying perpetrated by the EoE. I relise that you approached us with an offer to take down EoE together and we rebuked you. I formerly apologise on behalf of the Corporation. We are willing to work together to take down a common foe that is attacking us both indiscriminantly. I would also like you to unblock the I.P of "Guest" from "NEXUS" i am sorry to state that it was me in an unashamed attempt to gain enterance to your forum so that i would be able to see what was going on. I formarly apologise for my actions. I would like access to your forums as a diplomat/ liason and i shall work on afford the same treatment to you or a diplomat of your choice. If it is acceptable i would also like for Umbrella Corp personnel to have access to your forum as roleplayers. They would have access to the thread for roleplaying only. We would also afford the same to you with our forum. I shall also work on trying to get the haliman files taken down if you afford us the same with taking down the Umbrella zerg and fraud claims. I hope these agreements submit to your standards. I await your response with baited breath good sir. --Rohanzap 23:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC) I assure you if it was bullshit why would even bother in the first place? I would just stay with umbrella. I am only here to try to remonstrate and forge an alliance against EoE. If you would rather not believe me so be it. I wont bother spending my time trying to convince you.--Rohanzap 00:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Here is the honest deal. Have you ever been approached by me offering you an alliance? I give you my word that there shall be no betrayal not now not afterwards. Another safety net would be that if Umbrella does betray you then i shall leave. We shall help you as together we will be able to defeat EoE much more easily than if we were working seperatly. If co-ordinated dual strikes were perpetrated against their members then they would soon lose interest and disappear. The alliance would continue depending upon the leaders feelings. If you and the UC leaders felt that it wasnt working out you could remain neutral and come together again to face a common foe such as EoE. However, if you were to feel that the alliance was beneficial then you could work closely with the UC and eventually become true allies while expanding the sphere of influence. Working together would mean more members, greater recognition and more power for both parties. I would like to say that my opinion in things has been taken more seriously of late and i assure you that i will not stand for a betrayal. In what way do we zerg? I mean yes we do have the BOW program but it is hardly zerging to have them is it? There is also the fact that the BOW program has been inoperational for a fairly long time now. I believe it was inactive when Lanfried was still around. As for the claims of zerging i personally do not zerg and i believe that i can vouch for the collective of the Corporation when i say that as a whole (bar one or two individuals whom you have caught with alts (kylac, Thad and Jackson)) we do not zerg. I can also state that those with alts either use them rarely or they are completely inactive (except for the case of Jackson where he is leveling it for a friend and it is unrelated with the Umbrella Corporation). I am willing to put the bad blood and animosity between the UC and UBCS behind us and try to strive for a safer malton. I was not around for the period of time when you were with the UC so i have had no prior experience of you except for with the UBCS. I am neutral in the affairs between the UC and UBCS. However, i shall state again that it is a cordial alliance that has been offered in the hopes of friendship and help to defeat a common enemy. You extended the same offer to us and the leadership rebuked it due to loss of Krauser and Raven. They were worried that they had been spying so broke off contact completely. Since EoE's attacks it has been deemed acceptable to engage communications (thanks in part to myself) in the hopes of an alliance. If you are willing to let bad blood remain and old rebuttels rule your decision so be it but remember that this alliance was offered in friendship. Ask Lanfried,Raven and Krauser of their experiences with me and they will say that i am a fairly level headed person. You shall see that i speak the truth soon enough. Also if you would care to look at the EoE forums an interesting letter compiled by myself will be posted their shortly. I hope that this proves that i am indeed legitimate.--Rohanzap 01:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC) On which forum? The EoE forum or the UBCS forum? If it is the UBCS forum my I.P was blocked with the "guest" account. I still regret that incident but it was a darker time for me. I shall however do as you wish.--Rohanzap 01:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. I appear to be having connection problems at the moment (being unable to gain access to the UBCS forum or EoE forum and getting an "cannot display the page" page). I might be unable to make my new account until tomorrow. If this is the case i wholeheartedly apologise.--Rohanzap 02:00, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Well, that sucks. Umbrella seems to be working ok so far. Strange. Anyway, i shall make a new profile on your forums as soon as IF works again. Goodbye for now Haliman. It has been nice talking to you.--Rohanzap 02:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC) I'm still blocked. Are you calling off the talks or not? Remember i was the "Guest" account so if you could please unblock that one i will be able to register with my real username.--Rohanzap 10:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Ok. Im registered now.I'll post in the alliances thread.--Rohanzap 16:48, 8 February 2009 (UTC) SignatureHey lad, your sig is way too big and is creating a few screwy formatting problems. Offical policy states it has to be 14px high at most. Can you fix that? Ta. -- RoosterDragon 16:15, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
You know what's funny about the 14 px thing? It seems that when someone fixes it, it goes back to 15 after a while.--Suicidal Angel, Help needed? 17:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
DesktopWhat's wrong with your old desktop? You know, the one pictured with yourself and some girl?--Thadeous Oakley 17:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
HiJust an excuse to stalk your talk page. Anyway, keep going.--LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 04:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC) |