UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/Haliman vs Lithedarkangel: Difference between revisions
(BOOM) |
MisterGame (talk | contribs) (→BOOM) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
pwnt. --[[User:Skouth|Skouth]] 03:02, 11 April 2010 (BST) | pwnt. --[[User:Skouth|Skouth]] 03:02, 11 April 2010 (BST) | ||
lawl. Even though I know Krauser doesn't really care about what I think, I must say he handled the case accordingly. Cool ruling, bro. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 10:09, 11 April 2010 (BST) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:09, 11 April 2010
Since Li mentioned something about NOD, I look and find. This was created in july last year.
This on the other hand, was very recently, a few days ago to be exact. --
Thadeous Oakley 21:15, 7 April 2010 (BST)
- Why thank you Thadeous what ever would I do without you, I would be lost in bumblefuck attempting to find this. I will say this though unless you have something I don't know about. Kindly go fornicate yourself. --
03:03, 8 April 2010 (BST)
- Nah, I'll think I stay. --
Thadeous Oakley 08:22, 8 April 2010 (BST)
- Nah, I'll think I stay. --
Okay, sorry but I found this so confusing: "3) Funny how you only ask for my account when I make the comment "You may have to ban me someday." Is Haliman admitting he needs to be banned? =0 --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 02:58, 8 April 2010 (BST)
I find the apparent lack of proof in all these claims a bit worrying, I also am worried by the arbitrator not asking for proof aswell... At the moment it's all mostly just Hals' word against Li... As a bystander it makes it very difficult to establish a formulated opinion on the case. --
06:40, 8 April 2010 (BST) I've been working on access to both of said forums to check some of these things. You can see 2 of the forums linked there under the reply to Thad and I used to run UBCS naturally I have an account there. If you want I can show you some of the PM logs and IM logs I have between both of these individuals on this subject. --
07:07, 8 April 2010 (BST)
- No, it's fine, I'm just a bystander having a say. Don't worry about me. -- 07:47, 8 April 2010 (BST)
Something else I'm missing here is other UBCS members. Both Hal and Li claim the majority/most high ranking members are supporting them, but I haven't seen proof other than words. I'm not the arbitrator but don't you think it would be wise to get some witnesses in here? --Thadeous Oakley 08:22, 8 April 2010 (BST)
- Why Thad... is that you thinking I didn't PM other members also? -- 16:06, 8 April 2010 (BST)
Random
Sorry I missed this. Has the page been maliciously edited? As a result of the arbitration is their a request to protect it? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 17:56, 8 April 2010 (BST)
Lappy breaks for a few days and I miss dramas. :( 01:22, 9 April 2010 (BST)
Not really its a dispute mainly over where the forum links to. Li claims that there was a name change and Haliman subsequently banned the lot of them, Haliman claims they threw a coup and are attempting to redirect the forum link to a forum Li chooses. --
01:27, 9 April 2010 (BST)
BOOM
pwnt. --Skouth 03:02, 11 April 2010 (BST)
lawl. Even though I know Krauser doesn't really care about what I think, I must say he handled the case accordingly. Cool ruling, bro. --Thadeous Oakley 10:09, 11 April 2010 (BST)
