User talk:Revenant: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→ugh) |
(Snacks) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:::::<code><SA> SA is still banned what the fuck DDR<br/><SA> No, my IP is still banned. Fucks sake.</code><br/> Maybe just one more thing? {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 00:33, 23 March 2011 (UTC) | :::::<code><SA> SA is still banned what the fuck DDR<br/><SA> No, my IP is still banned. Fucks sake.</code><br/> Maybe just one more thing? {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 00:33, 23 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::::Alright thanks. I actually thought I'd done that already but I was on a rush out to uni and must have missed it. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 02:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC) | ::::::Alright thanks. I actually thought I'd done that already but I was on a rush out to uni and must have missed it. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 02:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Snacks == | |||
Glad you enjoyed it. I marinate regularly but you guys rarely ever take a bite.--{{User:ZIPO/sig}} 04:20, 29 March 2011 (BST) |
Revision as of 03:20, 29 March 2011
Please leave a message after the beep. (Newer messages at the bottom, please.)
Things Best Forgotten | |
This User talk page has an Archive |
Beep
ugh
I thought you were using that code as your signature and was about to give you a lecture about breaking the signature policy. NVM. I guess it's turned into a friendly 'just make sure you don't use that code in future' note? :) -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 00:09, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Which code was that? Also
ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 00:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
<SA> Hey rev, email DDR and tell him I demand a valid ban reason please. I don't feel like linking an email to the SA account- Oh lol, is that against signature policy? Since when? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 00:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- The 'malicious' special:logout link clause? Since ever, strangely enough. I really don't know, it was implemented before I arrived. As for SA, he was ban evading, if he wants to come back he can go through the correct channels to have his account unbanned (with any sysop, or even user I'm sure, not just me) -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 00:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ban avoidance--TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 00:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oh lol, is that against signature policy? Since when? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 00:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
<SA> All it says when I edit is that my reason for banning is , definitely not avoidance
So, uh, enlighten me: What would be "proper channels"? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 00:34, 22 March 2011 (UTC) P.S. #udwiki is still about, though people seem to eb chatting in #redrum.
- eb chatting? I don't usually bother with ban summaries. He can look at the vandal banning for an official reason (though I've already told him it via you so he probably shouldn't need to). Proper channels? Probably just like I said above, asking an op or just a member of the community, it wouldn't be difficult to be unbanned in his situation. All he's gotta do is ask -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 01:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
[06:11] <SA> REVENANT WAKE UP
[06:11] <SA> TELL THEMS THERE FAGGOTS TO UNBAN ME SO I CAN BITCH
How's that? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 19:56, 22 March 2011 (UTC)- Also, "eb chatting" == "be chatting". Simple transposition typo, gleesh! Easy to recognise. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 19:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's fine. You can tell him I've unblocked him -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 21:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
<SA> SA is still banned what the fuck DDR
<SA> No, my IP is still banned. Fucks sake.
Maybe just one more thing? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 00:33, 23 March 2011 (UTC)- Alright thanks. I actually thought I'd done that already but I was on a rush out to uni and must have missed it. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's fine. You can tell him I've unblocked him -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 21:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Also, "eb chatting" == "be chatting". Simple transposition typo, gleesh! Easy to recognise. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 19:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Snacks
Glad you enjoyed it. I marinate regularly but you guys rarely ever take a bite.--ZIPO/Talk/◆◆◆/CAPD 04:20, 29 March 2011 (BST)