UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Reevaluation for Bureaucrats: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Krazy Monkey (talk | contribs) (→For) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
===Against=== | ===Against=== | ||
#incomplete. if said crat has not faced an election in 8 months they will find themselves up for evaluation as per A/RE policy. it should specify that an election will ''replace'' the A/RE evaluation, rather accompany it. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 17:52, 13 May 2011 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 16:52, 13 May 2011
This line of A/BP will be changed to reflect the 8 months cycle.
| said: |
| If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 12 months, then an election is called after that period. |
New Text would be
| said: |
| If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 8 months, then an election is called after that period. |
Voting Section
| Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop. |
| The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
For
- Author Vote - This just makes sense. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 15:30, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- Down with the cats! Srsly, it would just get rid of a needless complication in the current system. --Oh, and vote on Project Funny, by the way. -- Spiderzed█ 15:39, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- Makes sense. -- Cheese 15:49, 13 May 2011 (BST)
Against
- incomplete. if said crat has not faced an election in 8 months they will find themselves up for evaluation as per A/RE policy. it should specify that an election will replace the A/RE evaluation, rather accompany it. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 17:52, 13 May 2011 (BST)
