UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Off-Site Requests for Admin Actions: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Against) |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
# -If it's even remotely worthwhile, it's worth taking the 10 seconds to log in and sign. If it isn't, then don't bother requesting it. --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 15:24, 30 May 2011 (BST) | # -If it's even remotely worthwhile, it's worth taking the 10 seconds to log in and sign. If it isn't, then don't bother requesting it. --[[User:Karloth_vois|Karloth Vois]] <sup>[[¯\(°_o)/¯]]</sup> 15:24, 30 May 2011 (BST) | ||
#:how about if they are banned?--{{User:Sexualharrison/sig}}<small>15:34, 30 May 2011 (bst)</small> | #:how about if they are banned?--{{User:Sexualharrison/sig}}<small>15:34, 30 May 2011 (bst)</small> | ||
#Why would anyone vote for this? It had potential right up until the author intentionally made it so on a whim any sysop can step in and undo the request. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 16:23, 30 May 2011 (BST) |
Revision as of 15:23, 30 May 2011
In general, off-site requests relayed to administrative pages don't need to be carried out, with a few exceptions:
- Actions requested on behalf of a banned user (especially for, but not necessarily limited to Permaban appeals).
- Actions that would have been considered to be scheduled anyway (particularly, but not limited to Scheduled Deletions and Scheduled Protections).
Sys-Ops may temporarily tolerate other off-site requests. As such a request is merely tolerated, a sys-op may anytime ask for another sys-op to overturn it, unless the user himself shows up on-site to confirm it.
The following actions are absolutely never eligible for off-site requests, but must always be asked for on-site:
- Votes
- Self-requested bans
- Self-requested demotions
Voting Section
Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop. |
The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
For
- -- Spiderzed█ 15:10, 30 May 2011 (BST)
- --User:Sexualharrison15:11, 30 May 2011 (bst)
- --TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 15:12, 30 May 2011 (BST)
- I still don't really like the part about temporarily tolerating other off-site requests but I don't suppose it can be too badly abused. It's probably just me and its no reason to shoot it down. Overall the policy is good and definitely one that is needed. ~ 15:15, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Against
- -If it's even remotely worthwhile, it's worth taking the 10 seconds to log in and sign. If it isn't, then don't bother requesting it. --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 15:24, 30 May 2011 (BST)
- how about if they are banned?--User:Sexualharrison15:34, 30 May 2011 (bst)
- Why would anyone vote for this? It had potential right up until the author intentionally made it so on a whim any sysop can step in and undo the request. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 16:23, 30 May 2011 (BST)