UDWiki:Open Discussion/Arbitration and Misconduct: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
===How to fix it=== | ===How to fix it=== | ||
''Free-for-all commenting here.'' | ''Free-for-all commenting here.'' | ||
*The problem with the arbitration system is the Arbitrators. Arbitrators need to realize what is a legitimate case and what isn't. I have seen so many arbitration cases which shouldn't have gotten past the first phase go all of the way through. The solution is to prevent people from letting these cases go through. This should not be a sysop job, but rather a job of the community. If there is a case which has no merit then it should be discarded. Of course if the community sees a case with merit being discarded then they should act to ensure that it remains. Action should only be taken once suitable discussion has occured however (you don't want edit wars raging). - [[User:Jedaz|Jedaz]] '''- [[Signature Race|<span style="font-size:85%; color: #639">01:40/16/01/2009</span>]]''' | |||
==Misconduct== | ==Misconduct== | ||
Revision as of 01:40, 16 January 2009
It's become clear through my observations that people have issues with arbitration and the misconduct systems and/or the people using it, yet we don't seem to be doing many things about it past highlighting the issue. I've created this open discussion in the hopes that we can get something accomplished, be it policy, guidelines, behaviour change or all of them.
Try to refrain from personal attacks and don't RE anyone in the problem sections.
Arbitration
Problem
Add what you think the problem(s) are, but keep it short and to the point.
- It takes too long / can be drawn out.-- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 21:19, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- No problems with it. The only "problem" at the moment is that certain parties are taking great pleasure in abusing it. That's not a problem with the system. --Cyberbob 21:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yep, I agree with Cyberbob here. The problem is people aren't doing things in they way they're intended because it's not in their favor, and instead bitching about how it's not right.--SirArgo Talk 21:30, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Too many loopholes, if a person doesnt want the case they just have to decline all arbitors.--'BPTmz 01:37, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
How to fix it
Free-for-all commenting here.
- The problem with the arbitration system is the Arbitrators. Arbitrators need to realize what is a legitimate case and what isn't. I have seen so many arbitration cases which shouldn't have gotten past the first phase go all of the way through. The solution is to prevent people from letting these cases go through. This should not be a sysop job, but rather a job of the community. If there is a case which has no merit then it should be discarded. Of course if the community sees a case with merit being discarded then they should act to ensure that it remains. Action should only be taken once suitable discussion has occured however (you don't want edit wars raging). - Jedaz - 01:40/16/01/2009
Misconduct
Problem
Add what you think the problem(s) are, but keep it short and to the point.
- It can take time to get a clear ruling, particularly in cases that are grey areas. -- Cheese 21:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- No problems with it. The only "problem" at the moment is that certain parties are taking great pleasure in abusing it. That's not a problem with the system. --Cyberbob 21:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- See my comment above.--SirArgo Talk 21:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
How to fix it
Free-for-all commenting here.
