Knights of the Burnt Bridge: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1487001 Eliot Conway] | [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1487001 Eliot Conway] | ||
[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=698760 gculk] | |||
[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=797953 Ljas] | [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=797953 Ljas] | ||
| Line 59: | Line 61: | ||
[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1549467 Whaever] | [http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1549467 Whaever] | ||
This is a '''definitive list'''. Anyone else carrying the tag of "Knights of the Burnt Bridge" is attempting to masquerade as a member of our group and shall be summarily dealt with. | |||
=Policies= | =Policies= | ||
Revision as of 06:57, 26 September 2009
| Knights of the Burnt Bridge | |
| Abbreviation: | KoBB |
| Group Numbers: | 20, Game Statistics Roster |
| Leadership: | James Ternius, Council of 5 |
| Goals: | To protect those not yet with the strength to protect themselves |
| Recruitment Policy: | To Be Decided |
| Contact: | Ingame |
About us
The Knights of the Burnt Bridge were created on the 9th of July 2009.
The name was one of many submitted and voted on as the most appropriate overall (The other contenders were The Warband Order of the Marshal Les Chevaliers de Bayard Bridgeburning Jade Knights of Light, Band of Survivors and Warband of (insert something here I couldn't think of one), so I presume it is obvious why the name "Knights of the Burnt Bridge" was chosen instead).
Given that the name was submitted by one James Ternius, he became leader.
Goals
Generally we have the goal of protection, of "defending those not yet with the strength", of being Honourable. We see it as our duty to uphold the wavering light of civilization in these dark streets, to hold the torch high, the candle in the dark. Not only will we actively attempt to reclaim suburbs in periodic operations, aiding those struggling few already trying, but we will protect and offer assistance to those recently awakened to the hellish existence that is Malton. As Knights, we swore an oath, and we intend to follow. To protect those not yet with the strength.
Members
- Leader: James Ternius
This is a definitive list. Anyone else carrying the tag of "Knights of the Burnt Bridge" is attempting to masquerade as a member of our group and shall be summarily dealt with.
Policies
This is a preliminary list not necessarily decided upon by all members as of this date. Until this notice disappears, it will remain so. These policies will be highly subject to change as our group finds our voice.
|
Sacred Ground Policy Supporter |
| This user or group supports the Sacred Ground Policy and acknowledges that all Cemeteries in the city of Malton are considered Revivification Points. |
 |
Centers Of Learning Policy Supporter |
| This user or group supports the Centers of Learning Policy & acknowledges that all libraries, schools, zoos, and museums in the city of Malton are considered safe places. No survivor in one of these locations may be killed for any reason unless that survivor is a specified enemy of this user or group. |
 |
Fine Art of Malton Supporter |
| This user or group supports the Fine Art of Malton movement & acknowledges that all museums are PK ceasefire zones, heal points, and are to be a barricading priority. |
 |
Artifact Protection Policy Supporter |
| This user or group supports the Artifact Protection Policy, acknowledging that the looting of museums is strictly prohibited. This user or group will do what they can to prevent museum theft in order to preserve Malton's cultural and intellectual integrity. |
 |
Uniform Barricading Policy Supporter |
| This User or Group supports the Uniform Barricading Policy by actively maintaining barricades according to local plan or UBP standard. |
 |
No Random Revives Supporter |
| This User or Group supports the No Random Revive Policy by utilizing Revivification Request tools. |
|
Fertilize the Land Policy |
| This user or group believes in regaining NT buildings at any cost! |
|
Mr. Rogers Style! |
| This user or group supports and follows the Mr. Rogers policy. |
|
Good Grooming |
| This user or group practices good grooming habits, and recommends that other Malton survivors do too. |
|
Supporter of River Tactics |
| I flow into the void. |
There are always exceptions to the River Tactics policy, but it is followed faithfully by the Knights in most cases.
Operations
Current Area of Operations
Shore Hills - Shore Hills is our home suburb. Expect to find at least three Knights in the suburb at all times.
History of Operations
Operation Rolling Thunder
The Lukinswood Operation marked the Knights' first mission as an official group. On August 30, 2009, James Ternius heard a distress call over the radio, requesting help for the suburb. In only a few days, almost all of the Knights were in Lukinswood, ready to fight off the zombie hordes. Initially, the Shortman Building became the Knights' base of operations in Lukinswood, and priority was given to defending the Stagg Building, the suburb's only NecroTech facility. The first few days of the operation resulted in heavy causalities for the Knights, however they held strong, undeterred by the deaths of several members.
On September 4, the focus shifted from the Stagg Building to St. Elisabeth's Hospital and the surrounding area. The Knights worked hard to hold the hospital, and despite numerous break-ins, it never fell. Lukinswood group Malpractice and the Phoenix Security Forces proved invaluable during this time. The days dragged on with little change. The Knights and other survivors worked hard to defend the hospital and surrounding area while the dead smashed against the barricades. Eventually, death cultists aided the zombies by barricading ruined buildings, preventing them from being repaired. But even with such dirty tactics, the dead were unable to achieve victory. The piñatas were breached and repaired, and the barricades at the other buildings held strong. Slowly, the break-ins became less frequent. On September 13, the Knights of the Burnt Bridge withdrew from Lukinswood, believing the suburb to be sufficiently defended. Overall, the first operation was a success. (written by Toffey)
