UDWiki:Open Discussion/Safest Place In Malton: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:Lukinswood's Coram Building is a zombie magnet with the Emergency Broadcast system, and there's been overspill from Ackland Mall sieges too. The Southwest corner has been consistently green-tinged for months, IIRC: [[Foulkes Village]] for example. My harmless zombie professor, on a tour of Malton's architectural wonders, is constantly being swatted down outside by bored-witless trenchies.--[[User:Mallrat|Mallrat]] 03:02, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | :Lukinswood's Coram Building is a zombie magnet with the Emergency Broadcast system, and there's been overspill from Ackland Mall sieges too. The Southwest corner has been consistently green-tinged for months, IIRC: [[Foulkes Village]] for example. My harmless zombie professor, on a tour of Malton's architectural wonders, is constantly being swatted down outside by bored-witless trenchies.--[[User:Mallrat|Mallrat]] 03:02, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Lukinswood probably hasn't been dangerous since March just from a lack of people who care enough to update the suburb's danger level or suburb page. --[[User:Johnny Bass|Papa Johnny]] 16:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | ::Lukinswood probably hasn't been dangerous since March just from a lack of people who care enough to update the suburb's danger level or suburb page. --[[User:Johnny Bass|Papa Johnny]] 16:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Hey now, Lukinswood does have survivor presence. It may not be a huge presence but its there. And yes we update the suburb page all the time. Don't believe me? Check the [[Lukinswood/News_Archive|archives]]. --[[User:Vapor|Vapor]] 18:01, 17 December 2009 (UTC) | :::Hey now, Lukinswood does have survivor presence. It may not be a huge presence but its there. And yes we update the suburb page all the time. Don't believe me? Check the [[Lukinswood/News_Archive|archives]]. Now I'm not claiming that Lukinswood is the safest suburb but at least give some credit where credit is due. --[[User:Vapor|Vapor]] 18:01, 17 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
=[[User:Johnny Bass|Papa Johnny]]= | =[[User:Johnny Bass|Papa Johnny]]= | ||
On a constant basis, there is no real "safest place in Malton." There's always some variety of dangers to every area and zombies can visit any suburb whenever they please and pkers tend to stray towards green suburbs. The more important piece of it is "Which areas have the shortest recovery time?" Good examples of suburbs with quick turnarounds are Locketside and Buttonville. Any place is "safe" if you either know the locals or have a really solid group working with you. --[[User:Johnny Bass|Papa Johnny]] 16:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | On a constant basis, there is no real "safest place in Malton." There's always some variety of dangers to every area and zombies can visit any suburb whenever they please and pkers tend to stray towards green suburbs. The more important piece of it is "Which areas have the shortest recovery time?" Good examples of suburbs with quick turnarounds are Locketside and Buttonville. Any place is "safe" if you either know the locals or have a really solid group working with you. --[[User:Johnny Bass|Papa Johnny]] 16:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 17 December 2009
LISTEN TO WHAT I SAY
Post under a new heading with your name as the title.
Chicago Edd
This is to debate/discuss what the safest place in Malton is (most high level survivors/fastest revives/least zombies). Personally, say its Yagoton because of the YRC and the Abandoned.
edit: I saw NO zombies (besides myself) while I was en route to the YRC.
Rosslessness
Impossible question. You cite a suburb you feel is safe, but do you mean in the long term?
To have a "Safe area" I always feel it has to be surrounded by "Safe Areas", there are several places I'd argue are relatively safe, but with the MOB just around the corner you can never be sure.
I mean even Yagoton is bordering a zombie infested ghost town at the moment. :) --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 17:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- I saw NO zombies (besides myself) while I was en route to the YRC. --Chicago Edd 02:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- I only saw one survivor, though. --Chicago Edd 02:55, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Haliman
Ridleybank.
Zombies need a safe place too. --Haliman - Talk 17:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Rorybob
Lukinswood. The last time it was Very Dangerous was March. --RahrahCome join the #party!18:34, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- Lukinswood's Coram Building is a zombie magnet with the Emergency Broadcast system, and there's been overspill from Ackland Mall sieges too. The Southwest corner has been consistently green-tinged for months, IIRC: Foulkes Village for example. My harmless zombie professor, on a tour of Malton's architectural wonders, is constantly being swatted down outside by bored-witless trenchies.--Mallrat 03:02, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Lukinswood probably hasn't been dangerous since March just from a lack of people who care enough to update the suburb's danger level or suburb page. --Papa Johnny 16:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hey now, Lukinswood does have survivor presence. It may not be a huge presence but its there. And yes we update the suburb page all the time. Don't believe me? Check the archives. Now I'm not claiming that Lukinswood is the safest suburb but at least give some credit where credit is due. --Vapor 18:01, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- Lukinswood probably hasn't been dangerous since March just from a lack of people who care enough to update the suburb's danger level or suburb page. --Papa Johnny 16:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Papa Johnny
On a constant basis, there is no real "safest place in Malton." There's always some variety of dangers to every area and zombies can visit any suburb whenever they please and pkers tend to stray towards green suburbs. The more important piece of it is "Which areas have the shortest recovery time?" Good examples of suburbs with quick turnarounds are Locketside and Buttonville. Any place is "safe" if you either know the locals or have a really solid group working with you. --Papa Johnny 16:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
