User talk:Misanthropy

Please post new comments at the bottom, using the highest-level header (=header name=).

I'll reply on your talk page if you contact me here.

Cheers.

For any users posting a sixth (or, indeed, seventh or beyond) topic on this page, full permission is granted to move the oldest topic in its entirety to the relevant archive.

Not that any of you will ever do it, but it's worth disclaimer-ing it to avoid unnecessary A/VB shitepipery.

Vandalisms

Do you believe a checkuser between this user and the one you perma'd earlier is in order? Both were created around midnight, editted the same page (which one of them made), and accused each other of being the leader on it. I know it's pretty strawman, but should we do a checkuser, just to be sure?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 16:08, 10 May 2010 (BST)

I always run a check user on anyone I ban, and the one I ran on Wesker showed nothing. You can double check it in case Vash was created afterwards but I don't think it was. 16:09, 10 May 2010 (BST)

Nah it wasn't. I assumed there would have been a check, but just wanted to make sure.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 16:14, 10 May 2010 (BST)

Checkuser all vandal users, those you suspect of sockpuppeting votes and anyone involved in a debate about how zerging is cool. You would be amazed how many of the latter have alternate accounts. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 16:29, 10 May 2010 (BST)

sigh

I never had any intention of winning, but I'm still disappointed in what both VVV and RHO are doing on your competition, cause (particularly VVV) isn't helping the actual cause of the comp at all... I would at leased ask that you visit the talk page of your competition and address or discuss my request to have the image rule removed or amended. At the moment its ended up in shitty image spam and little else. --

 

 

 

 

08:08, 12 May 2010 (BST)

Suggestion voting

I looked around the wiki, but couldn't find who is allowed to vote on suggestions. Thanks in advance if you can clarify for me. The Surreal McCoy 01:46, 13 May 2010 (BST)

*yoink* Anyone can vote on suggestions. The only places where voting is restricted is in regards to some of the admin pages (e.g. A/M and A/VB). —Aichon— 02:12, 13 May 2010 (BST)

Yep, like Aich said, any vote on the wiki except for Vandal Banning or Misconduct can be voted on by any member of the community. 12:58, 13 May 2010 (BST)

Thanks for the quick reply, I'll be reading all the suggestion rules and whatnot so perhaps I can join in. The Surreal McCoy 03:21, 18 May 2010 (BST)

Chomp

Thanks for the nibble. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 18:39, 19 May 2010 (BST)

Om nom nom. You taste terrible. 18:47, 19 May 2010 (BST)

The profile name was a clue. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 19:00, 19 May 2010 (BST)

I assumed that meant you were a main course, not a soup. 19:09, 19 May 2010 (BST)

Feral Death-Cultist Guide

It's finished so far. I'll fine-tune it a bit over the next couple of days and ask a native speaker to proof-read it for me, but basically, it's ripe for Developing Guides. Any further comments on it beforehand? -- Spiderzed▋ 19:45, 24 May 2010 (BST)

Thanks, that was some good advice. The headers all went up by one level, and I've put more examples into it. Is there yet any section in particular of which you think that it should have more examples and/or more explanation? Else, I'll just wait for Sherry to be done with the proof-reading and will then submit it to DS. -- Spiderzed▋ 15:56, 27 May 2010 (BST)

Actually, I've never GKed in Millen Hills. I just looked up burbs with many NTs, looked which of those only have a couple of hospitals, and Millen Hills was the first one I found. While RRs are great places for GKing, I'll think I'll leave it at that, as a.) RRs tend to vanish and re-appear and that particular piece might become outdated later and b.) the point is that a bottleneck for a particular resource can make it more attractive to attack a normally less important TRP first. -- Spiderzed▋ 13:34, 29 May 2010 (BST)

Very good points. I'm aware of keeping an eye on adjoining suburbs, but I wanted to keep it simple as that wasn't the main point. However, I settled now for Molebank as an example suburb, where the situation is a bit clearer even if you consider the adjoining suburbs, and added a note about considering TRPs near the suburb borders. -- Spiderzed▋ 14:03, 29 May 2010 (BST)