Developing Suggestions: Difference between revisions
(→Discussion (Impostor Check): A bit of research shows that that the new font, Anonymous Pro, is a pretty damn good choice…) |
(→Discussion (Impostor Check): Also, I'll be sure to pass those thanks along. ;)) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
A bit of research shows that that the new font, [http://www.google.com/webfonts/specimen/Anonymous+Pro Anonymous Pro], is a pretty damn good choice, as "[c]haracters that could be mistaken for one another (O, 0, I, l, 1, etc.) have distinct shapes to make them easier to tell apart in the context of source code." Of course, the tweak is only going to work for those with the font installed; as it's a free font, chances are it may be bundled with operating systems (I certainly don't recall installing it), but it's not going to be an overall fix. Nevertheless, nice work, the both of you! {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 17:35, 27 April 2012 (BST) | A bit of research shows that that the new font, [http://www.google.com/webfonts/specimen/Anonymous+Pro Anonymous Pro], is a pretty damn good choice, as "[c]haracters that could be mistaken for one another (O, 0, I, l, 1, etc.) have distinct shapes to make them easier to tell apart in the context of source code." Of course, the tweak is only going to work for those with the font installed; as it's a free font, chances are it may be bundled with operating systems (I certainly don't recall installing it), but it's not going to be an overall fix. Nevertheless, nice work, the both of you! {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 17:35, 27 April 2012 (BST) | ||
:Also, I'll be sure to pass those thanks along. {{wink}} {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 17:36, 27 April 2012 (BST) | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 16:36, 27 April 2012
| NOTICE |
| The Suggestions system has been closed indefinitely and Developing Suggestions is no longer functions as a part of the suggestions process.
However, you are welcome to use this page for general discussion on suggestions. |
Developing Suggestions
This section is for general discussion of suggestions for the game Urban Dead.
It also includes the capacity to pitch suggestions for conversation and feedback.
Further Discussion
- Discussion concerning this page takes place here.
- Discussion concerning the suggestions system in general, including policies about it, takes place here.
Resources
How To Make a Discussion
Adding a New Discussion
To add a general discussion topic, please add a Tier 3 Header (===Example===) below, with your idea or proposal.
Adding a New Suggestion
- To add a new suggestion proposal, copy the code in the box below.
- Click here to begin editing. This is the same as clicking the [edit] link to the right of the Suggestions header.
- Paste the copied text above the other suggestions, right under the heading.
- Substitute the text in RED CAPITALS with the details of your suggestion.
- The process is illustrated in this image.
{{subst:DevelopingSuggestion
|time=~~~~
|name=SUGGESTION NAME
|type=TYPE HERE
|scope=SCOPE HERE
|description=DESCRIPTION HERE
}}
- Name - Give the suggestion a short but descriptive name.
- Type is the nature of the suggestion, such as a new class, skill change, balance change.
- Scope is who or what the suggestion affects. Typically survivors or zombies (or both), but occasionally Malton, the game interface or something else.
- Description should be a full explanation of your suggestion. Include information like flavor text, search odds, hit percentages, etc, as appropriate. Unless you are as yet unsure of the exact details behind the suggestion, try not to leave out anything important. Check your spelling and grammar.
Cycling Suggestions
- Suggestions with no new discussion in the past month may be cycled without notice.
Please add new discussions and suggestions to the top of the list
Suggestions
Impostor Check
| Timestamp: •▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 12:42, 27 April 2012 (BST) | ||
| Type: Interface | ||
| Scope: Impostors | ||
Description: I've recently emailed Kevan regarding impostors in Urban Dead. This was what he had to say about the subject:
I bring this to Developing Suggestions today, in hopes of helping Kevan find a way to best combat impostors, but as it stands, the only idea I have is, taking Kevan's trivial automated system above, and including a profile description check as well as a name check. But that idea probably won't work due to such groups such as Pathetic Bill and SillyLillyPilly (if any members from one of those two groups are reading this, I sarcastically thank you for making things ten times more difficult for this suggestion). The email is available for forwarding if anyone wants proof of it. |
Discussion (Impostor Check)
Discuss! Give your thoughts, and let's help Kevan come up with a way to combat impostors! --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 12:44, 27 April 2012 (BST)
A bit of research shows that that the new font, Anonymous Pro, is a pretty damn good choice, as "[c]haracters that could be mistaken for one another (O, 0, I, l, 1, etc.) have distinct shapes to make them easier to tell apart in the context of source code." Of course, the tweak is only going to work for those with the font installed; as it's a free font, chances are it may be bundled with operating systems (I certainly don't recall installing it), but it's not going to be an overall fix. Nevertheless, nice work, the both of you! ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 17:35, 27 April 2012 (BST)
Suggestions up for voting
The following are suggestions that were developed here but have since gone to voting. The discussions that were taking place here have been moved to the pages linked below.
There are currently no suggestions up for voting.
