|
Directions for Posting
If replying to a comment, please add a colon. ":" If replying to a reply, please add that many colons, plus one. Please sign all comments, and NO FLAMING, PLEASE! Also, remember:
|
The Drama Llama is Watching You
|
| The owner of this page reserves the right to delete trolling and drama at their discretion.
|
 |
Things Best Forgotten
|
| This User talk page has an Archive
|
|
Things Best Forgotten
|
| This User talk page has an Archive
|
MethMan
The Meth Man says: Fear no zeds!! Fear no death!! Fear the Meth!!
The Meth Man jumps from the window. --Lithedarkangel 00:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- That was creative! *Haliman Chases after methman.* --Haliman - Talk 18:15, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- The Meth Man jumps behind you and says: You are slow!, you need more Power!, You need The Meth!. Gives you some meth and goes on the run again.--Lithedarkangel 21:53, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- -*Haliman takes the meth.* Need..... MOAR.... POWAH!!!--Haliman - Talk 22:50, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- The Meth Man shouts: "Catch me if you want more!". You see the Meth Man running inside a pet shop.--Lithedarkangel 01:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- -*Haliman runs to the pet shot.* "You can't escape me meth man!" --Haliman - Talk 03:42, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- You enter the pet shop and are welcome by some methified parrots. The parrot one:"Bang, Bang...Harmanz ar har." The parrot two:" Mrh?... Brrrhh!". There is a trace of meth on the floor.
- "Strange...." *Haliman follows the meth trail.* --Haliman - Talk 03:14, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- You follow the trail and found a small pink box on the ground. It has a card attached: "Open til November 5... or when you are chasing the Meth Man." --Lithedarkangel 03:59, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- "Well, I'm following eth Man, so..." *Haliman opens the box.* --Haliman - Talk 23:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- You open the box and found the following item: It's a Meth syringe!. Congratz!--Lithedarkangel 00:41, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
- -*Haliman uses the syringe.* "So... Much... POWAH!" --Haliman - Talk 04:17, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Drama?
Funny wiki drama. Hahaha. Don't worry Hal. We do have the needles and the ammo. :) --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 02:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- The wiki would cease to function without drama. It's just another day at the office :). Linkthewindow Talk 02:04, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Dare I say, shall we update the wiki Drama level to.... WIKIGATE?!!?!?!?!?!!?!!?!1!?!/11/!?1?1?!1?!--Haliman - Talk 03:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Nah :P. It seems a bit more dramatic then usual, although I get the feeling it's been a tad quiet the past few week. (OT: Lithe, your sig goes invisible on Haliman's background :P.) Linkthewindow Talk 03:22, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- XD, hehe. Drama is everywhere. I laugh about it. And yeah, my signature goes invisible... because of the black background.--LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 03:25, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Drama's fun... to watch. Not so much when you're involved. --Pestolence(talk) 03:30, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- You would know :P. This UBCS/UC stuff has been going on for a while. I suspect the only reason it ever died down was because of an arby case saying that they couldn't speak to eachother. Linkthewindow Talk 03:52, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- I guess the name Umbrella is synonymous to drama.--LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 03:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Lol, Soldier was an exception. I think his leaving was more of a public service than a dramafest. --Pestolence(talk) 04:02, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Soldier leaving? Oh an Pestolence, wanna know something weird? I was checking out your page today xD Creepy. --Haliman - Talk 04:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, and this drama has been going on for half a year. We're at war with them in-game too. --Haliman - Talk 04:04, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Well, technically he left, but he's still lurking on a new alt. --Pestolence(talk) 04:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah "technically," although I haven't seen his alt for a while. I think he may be laying low and hope that those of us on the UDwiki have memory loss. How long have you been at war with them for? Linkthewindow Talk 04:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- The memory loss comment was a low blow :(. And for... A little over a day. xD They killed 4, we killed 9. They even attacked us first xD --Haliman - Talk 04:43, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Meh, that's not too long at all. A "war" or a skirmish? Anyway, people have a very short memory on the internet. Ask the guys who where around at November the 27th at Gamespot. Linkthewindow Talk 07:41, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- I would just like to point out that this "war" started in retaliation for the murder of one of our members by one of the UBCS over simple graffiti. You don't kill a member and get away with it.-Jackson
- I love being hated. "Hate" on the internet is Kewl these days it seems. Seriously, hate is a serious emotion so what is it doing on the web?--Thadeous Oakley 14:30, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
This seems like the right place, anyway. Regarding the copyrighted thing. It certainly wouldn't be the first time a user in all seriousness tried to claim group stuff as copyrighted which might be why it was commented on there, Boxy has had to deal with it in the past. --Karekmaps?! 14:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Interesting... I started this bit and now a whole talk is written. Hal many people are stalking your talk page. --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 22:04, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- No, too many people stalk Recent Changes :P. Linkthewindow Talk 22:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Haliman stalks me though XD --Pestolence(talk) 22:50, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
*Charges in a la Pedobear* Did someone say stalkage?-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 22:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- I said stalk...but nevermind. lol. --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 22:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- You guys are jerks. Now I'm gonna have to archive everything again... Once we break the page xD First off, I have the most colorful sig on this page. :D --Haliman - Talk 23:00, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not a jerk. And yes to archive!!! weee!!. --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 23:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Archived everything but the Active stuff. --Haliman - Talk 23:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- I, however, am a humongous jerk. At least someone appreciates me... --Pestolence(talk) 23:22, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Ha, compared to me, you guys are some of the best people on the wiki.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 23:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Are you kidding? Me? One of the best? Lulz. --Haliman - Talk 23:30, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- I would not deny that I'm one of the best. XD --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 23:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- I would understand Li being one of the best though :D --Haliman - Talk 23:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed. Li is awesome!.--LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 00:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Not as awesome as methman, though. :D --Haliman - Talk 03:48, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Your color scheme
It hurts my eyes :) --Pestolence(talk) 03:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- It's a security measure, so nobody can read my page. xD --Haliman - Talk 03:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
I commented in full har. I'll help, just give me a few days. Linkthewindow Talk 13:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! We're gonna need more people :) --Haliman - Talk 23:12, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Cookie
|
A FREE COOKIE... OF EVIL!
|
| Li has given Hal an evil cookie for not giving me a cookie and not paying me.. Go on... eat it.
|
Glows?
Enough glowing? --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 03:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oooh Shiny (: --Haliman - Talk 03:48, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah shiny. You gave yourself a cookie --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 04:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oooh cookies :D --Haliman - Talk 04:37, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- ... too much cookies... --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 22:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Theres never too many :D --Haliman - Talk 04:27, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
No more.
Please, stop the wiki drama Hal. We will solve this. :) --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 19:59, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Wha? --Haliman - Talk 23:43, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- XD. ok. Ok. Don't kill me. I will type it in another way: Let them do what ever, they are the ones loosing. --LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 00:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Arbitration
Umbrella have posted that they accept the arbitration and will represent themselves. I highly recommend, regardless of what others say, that you do not let this case drop and pursue it to the conclusion. --  .  . <== DDR Approved Editor 05:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't plan on dropping it. --Haliman - Talk 18:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Grammatical fix
Thanks for fixing that up for me, I was trying to decided between "then" and "than". Language is not my strongest suit. =P - Jedaz - 03:45/16/01/2009
- No problem, man. I stalk the recent changes page. :P --Haliman - Talk 03:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
BD
Check your PMs on our board man.
BD (i'd use my sig, but it's freaking messed up right now)
how do i get rid of this massive timestamp??? -- BULLDOGC6 04:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Headline text
UC alliance with UBCS
Dear Haliman,
I am extending the hand of friendship to you from the Umbrella Corporation. I have been in talks with jackson over recent events including the repeated attacks and spying perpetrated by the EoE. I relise that you approached us with an offer to take down EoE together and we rebuked you. I formerly apologise on behalf of the Corporation. We are willing to work together to take down a common foe that is attacking us both indiscriminantly.
I would also like you to unblock the I.P of "Guest" from "NEXUS" i am sorry to state that it was me in an unashamed attempt to gain enterance to your forum so that i would be able to see what was going on. I formarly apologise for my actions. I would like access to your forums as a diplomat/ liason and i shall work on afford the same treatment to you or a diplomat of your choice.
If it is acceptable i would also like for Umbrella Corp personnel to have access to your forum as roleplayers. They would have access to the thread for roleplaying only. We would also afford the same to you with our forum.
I shall also work on trying to get the haliman files taken down if you afford us the same with taking down the Umbrella zerg and fraud claims.
I hope these agreements submit to your standards.
I await your response with baited breath good sir.
--Rohanzap 23:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- BS. --Haliman - Talk 00:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
I assure you if it was bullshit why would even bother in the first place? I would just stay with umbrella. I am only here to try to remonstrate and forge an alliance against EoE. If you would rather not believe me so be it. I wont bother spending my time trying to convince you.--Rohanzap 00:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'm just saying. So far, everytime UC has approached me with a chance to work together, you guys fucked it up by a) Turning on us, or b) Not helping at all. --Haliman - Talk 01:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Here is the honest deal. Have you ever been approached by me offering you an alliance? I give you my word that there shall be no betrayal not now not afterwards. Another safety net would be that if Umbrella does betray you then i shall leave. We shall help you as together we will be able to defeat EoE much more easily than if we were working seperatly. If co-ordinated dual strikes were perpetrated against their members then they would soon lose interest and disappear. The alliance would continue depending upon the leaders feelings. If you and the UC leaders felt that it wasnt working out you could remain neutral and come together again to face a common foe such as EoE. However, if you were to feel that the alliance was beneficial then you could work closely with the UC and eventually become true allies while expanding the sphere of influence. Working together would mean more members, greater recognition and more power for both parties.
I would like to say that my opinion in things has been taken more seriously of late and i assure you that i will not stand for a betrayal.
- We detest zergers. Sorry. --Haliman - Talk 01:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
In what way do we zerg? I mean yes we do have the BOW program but it is hardly zerging to have them is it? There is also the fact that the BOW program has been inoperational for a fairly long time now. I believe it was inactive when Lanfried was still around. As for the claims of zerging i personally do not zerg and i believe that i can vouch for the collective of the Corporation when i say that as a whole (bar one or two individuals whom you have caught with alts (kylac, Thad and Jackson)) we do not zerg. I can also state that those with alts either use them rarely or they are completely inactive (except for the case of Jackson where he is leveling it for a friend and it is unrelated with the Umbrella Corporation).
I am willing to put the bad blood and animosity between the UC and UBCS behind us and try to strive for a safer malton. I was not around for the period of time when you were with the UC so i have had no prior experience of you except for with the UBCS. I am neutral in the affairs between the UC and UBCS.
However, i shall state again that it is a cordial alliance that has been offered in the hopes of friendship and help to defeat a common enemy. You extended the same offer to us and the leadership rebuked it due to loss of Krauser and Raven. They were worried that they had been spying so broke off contact completely. Since EoE's attacks it has been deemed acceptable to engage communications (thanks in part to myself) in the hopes of an alliance.
If you are willing to let bad blood remain and old rebuttels rule your decision so be it but remember that this alliance was offered in friendship. Ask Lanfried,Raven and Krauser of their experiences with me and they will say that i am a fairly level headed person. You shall see that i speak the truth soon enough. Also if you would care to look at the EoE forums an interesting letter compiled by myself will be posted their shortly. I hope that this proves that i am indeed legitimate.--Rohanzap 01:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Make a new account with your real username. --Haliman - Talk 01:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
On which forum? The EoE forum or the UBCS forum? If it is the UBCS forum my I.P was blocked with the "guest" account. I still regret that incident but it was a darker time for me. I shall however do as you wish.--Rohanzap 01:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- UBCS forums. I'll unban your IP as soon as IF starts working again. --Haliman - Talk 01:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. I appear to be having connection problems at the moment (being unable to gain access to the UBCS forum or EoE forum and getting an "cannot display the page" page). I might be unable to make my new account until tomorrow. If this is the case i wholeheartedly apologise.--Rohanzap 02:00, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- That's what I meant. IF = InvisionFree. All of the forums are down. D: --Haliman - Talk 02:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Well, that sucks. Umbrella seems to be working ok so far. Strange. Anyway, i shall make a new profile on your forums as soon as IF works again. Goodbye for now Haliman. It has been nice talking to you.--Rohanzap 02:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm still blocked. Are you calling off the talks or not? Remember i was the "Guest" account so if you could please unblock that one i will be able to register with my real username.--Rohanzap 10:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- I just got online. Should be fine now. --Haliman - Talk 15:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Ok. Im registered now.I'll post in the alliances thread.--Rohanzap 16:48, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Signature
Hey lad, your sig is way too big and is creating a few screwy formatting problems. Offical policy states it has to be 14px high at most. Can you fix that? Ta. --  RoosterDragon  16:15, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Damn. Alright, I'll start editing. Sorry for the trouble :( --Haliman - Talk 16:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Got your message, I've just had a go at it myself to try and cut it down. It's 14px images and 18px tall. (The policy is only against images over 14px, handily) You can try the 2px solid border rather than 1 px if you like, that probably won't affect anything. If anybody complains about it 'breaking the wiki' then don't worry, because ambiguous wording in the policy mean that currently 95% of all sigs are actually in violation. -- RoosterDragon 16:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you! :D --Haliman - Talk 16:59, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
You know what's funny about the 14 px thing? It seems that when someone fixes it, it goes back to 15 after a while.--Suicidal Angel, Help needed? 17:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- I don't get why it's 14px, most people use superscript which actually interferes with line spacing anyway (hence my '95% of sigs are in violation' remark), 17px is easily possible without further breaking the line spacing more than that. -- RoosterDragon 17:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe that's so people can have a border with their pictures? OMFG. IF THOSE UC ASSHOLES CONTACT ME ONE MORE TIME I'M GONNA EXPLODE. --Haliman - Talk 17:14, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Desktop
What's wrong with your old desktop? You know, the one pictured with yourself and some girl?--Thadeous Oakley 17:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- You'd be surprised about what I know, even in retirement.--Thadeous Oakley 20:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi
Just an excuse to stalk your talk page. Anyway, keep going.--LithedarkangelMeth!The Great Meth Man 04:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- You should really change the color of your headings. They...like...blend in with the background! Oh no! D: --Met Fan F 03:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
|
