User talk:Ram Rock Ed First

Hey, I moved the barricade plan to another page, which is right here. Hope you don't mind and thanks a bunch for all the help writing something that long! Stay Classy! Ron Burgundy 07:41, 14 September 2006 (BST)

---

Heyz Ramrock, I see you started playing again (or never left in the first place).. Just came back myself after years of absence. You're one of the few contacts that weren't 'missing in action' Any plans on reviving The Gingerbread Men or The Gingerbraaains since my Gingerbreadwoman Galliminus is still stalking Malton along with Vykos and Owan Glimmerfeld from CMS-Meta. Ohzz.. sweet memories.. ;) Sascha Vykos ^CMS-Meta 12:07, 1 February 2010 (BST)

Hey Gallimimus/Sascha Vykos,

I've been concentrating on staying alive in the closed-perma-death server Borehamwood (I just unleashed a fireworks flae show/groan on me below the Big Brother House, that'll stir things up a bit - just 2 of us left in our outcast fun group, 20 in the main group) and not played as much on the main server. I've been idling in and out in Malton for the past year and a half but never truely stopped playing, UD is as mucha social circle as anything else. We're in the Lion Enclosure with John Sparks and the Night Raver's whom we've had a long association with alongside the Zoo Keepers. You JUST missed out on this year's Annual Gingerbread Men/Zombie Fishbake in the Aquarium, it was the longest one we've ever had go before we were all killed, over 3 weeks iirc. Shoot me a message on the l2k/GBM/old CMS-Meta forums and we'll get in contact but otherwise inside The Lion Enclosure. People like Bender B Rodriguez and Almond with Tietjens are running with us these days. :)Ram ock Ed First 01:31 28 March 2010 (AEST)

To answer your question

What you mentioned is perfectly fine. For instance, it's not uncommon to have something like the following occur (the numbers in parenthesis are the order in which the comments were added):

Person A's comment. (1)

Person B's comment. (2)

Person C's retort to B's comment. (4)

Person D's comment in response to C's retort that gets inserted before C's reply. (5)

Person C's reply to A's comment. (3)

Hopefully that makes sense. If not, in this case, we see that both C and D insert comments before the #3 reply that C made, which is perfectly fine, since it's clear who posted when and they're not altering the individual comments as they were written. It's only when you break up a single comment that we start to get into issues. If that happens, the usual correct response is to remove the intruding comment and then optionally place it below your own comment as if it were a normal reply. As you pointed out, it's harder to do a point-by-point reply like this, but such is the wiki sometimes. —Aichon— 11:08, 4 April 2010 (BST)

Dead

Ha ha ha - Your self inflating groanings on your page are like a guy trying to suck himself off and then pat himself on the back. Stand up and take a bow, living in a game with only about 30 actual zombies in it must be fucking hard, and then saluting yourself about it ha ha ha ha. Even the survivors are laughing at you. --EmPathetic Bill 01:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC)