UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2011 03
This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.
Speedy Deletion Queue
Unused Templates
- Template:Eyehurter
- Template:Dulston Alliance Helper
- Template:Tumbleweedpart3
- Template:Pretzola
- Template:Pistola
- Template:Doublebarrel
Template:LondonNow used. -- Cheese 15:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Seeing how it's Ash Wednesday, seems fitting some stuff gets nuked. =p -- Cheese 15:36, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Template:London - now used -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 15:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Okie dokes, I've struck that one. -- Cheese 15:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Have seen it, but will give this some time for potential adopters. At least Template:Dulston Alliance Helper looks like something that might be planned to be used at a moment's notice, but just isn't currently. -- Spiderzed▋ 16:29, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Okie dokes, I've struck that one. -- Cheese 15:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Served Speedy Deletions
Crit 7
Vapor thinks that it's not working do to bad mojo, so we'll delete the page, but NOT THE TALK PAGE, and put it back up again. Hopefully, that will cleanse it of it's juju. --VVV RPMBG 17:40, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- done. Talk page kept.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:42, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Category:Brazilian User
Crit 4. -- Cheese 15:48, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Defenders of Life
Found this in the SD category but there's been no request put on here. Crit 7 by the looks of it. -- Cheese 15:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
User:DangerReport/Schonlau Motel (Pitneybank)
C1. Unneeded and freshly created dupe of User:DangerReport/The Schonlau Motel, which plainly wasn't correctly embedded in the location page at that time. -- Spiderzed▋ 01:01, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done, -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:20, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Annus_Horribilis/CH
orpaned & crit7 -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 14:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done. ~
16:07, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Annus_Horribilis/RH
orphaned & crit7 -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 14:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done. ~ 16:07, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Test Page adsad
Obvious C1 is obvious. (And no, C1 isn't scheduled, so I have to wait for a 2nd op deleting it and/or a regular user demanding SD to deal with it if I want to be on the safe side.) -- Spiderzed▋ 11:22, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done. ~ 16:07, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Update
wat -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 11:30, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- KEEP - Jesus God, man, it's just been created. Also, check the Box's talk, the user wants to create an update system for RPs like the DangerReport system. If anything, this could go on A/MR, but it's so not a speedy deletion it hurts.
16:48, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- yerrrr dangerreports go on the article of the location much like the user's been using it, so good call! -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 17:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- I don't understand you here. Instead of moving this to the template namespace and letting the user develop it, you want it deleted outright without any cited criterion? Why? 18:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Erm. I don't understand you here. User wants to make a danger-report like template. User creates said template and includes it on a page called Update. User doesn't touch Update again and continues to include the danger-report like template on actual location pages, which is the way it should be used. I assume Update was made for some sort of sandbox for the template he made. and the crit is crit 1, assumed it was so obvious by looking at the content I didn't care to specify. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 23:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- In case it wasn't clear, Mis, the template exists at Template:RPSM, and Update is just an inclusion of that template.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- See that's clear now. I had assumed Update actually was the template. As such, yes, this is crit 1. 23:33, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- See that's clear now. I had assumed Update actually was the template. As such, yes, this is crit 1.
- In case it wasn't clear, Mis, the template exists at Template:RPSM, and Update is just an inclusion of that template.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Erm. I don't understand you here. User wants to make a danger-report like template. User creates said template and includes it on a page called Update. User doesn't touch Update again and continues to include the danger-report like template on actual location pages, which is the way it should be used. I assume Update was made for some sort of sandbox for the template he made. and the crit is crit 1, assumed it was so obvious by looking at the content I didn't care to specify. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 23:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- I don't understand you here. Instead of moving this to the template namespace and letting the user develop it, you want it deleted outright without any cited criterion? Why?
- yerrrr dangerreports go on the article of the location much like the user's been using it, so good call! -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 17:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
