Suggestion:20090108 Use of Flares Inside Buildings

20090108 Use of Flares Inside Buildings

SecretGoldfish 17:57, January 8, 2009

Suggestion type
New use of existing item

Suggestion scope
Flares can be used inside of unlit buildings to briefly improve search results and attacks.

Suggestion description
I know a variation of this idea has been discussed in the form of 'flashlights', 'chemsticks', etc., and been rejected as giving all of the benefit of genny searches without the accompanying downside. This idea is meant to be some middle ground.

I propose that use of flares inside of buildings be allowed for search and attack purposes. But, any illumination would only last for either (a) a specific number of searches or attacks, or; (b) a specific period of real time.

For example, in a darkened theater, a flare going off would provide lit or near-lit hit values for one full pistol clip or two loaded shotguns. A flare in a hospital would provide lit search results for 10 searches. This middle ground suggestion makes it possible to search or hit inside of darkened buildings but within limits of the number of flare guns you have and the total period of time or AP's the lighting is provided for.

This arguably tilts the field towards survivors, but you could also see this as leveling the field as it now stands -- there is a large penalty in searching for a generator and fuel cans and the genny can be quickly taken out, negating a day's worth of searching and a quarter of your carrying capacity.

Between the previous 'portable lighting devices' suggestions which were rejected and the existing genny/fuel combo being the SOLE means of lighting a building, this would seem to be a reasonable balance point.

Suggested Mechanics of Modification

I think due to variations in players' server speeds, the fairest way to implement temporary flare lighting is a specific number of actions per flare as opposed to a specific period of real time. So here is the formal suggestion:

Should UD be modified allow for the use of flares inside of buildings? An indoor flare will improve search results to those of a fully lit building for a specific period of 10 searches. An indoor flare will improve attack results to those of a fully lit building for a period of one full pistol clip OR two full shotguns.

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

Kill Votes

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. Spam - Unbalanced gun-wanker buff which does not take into account the fire risk. --Papa Moloch 20:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
2. Spam - As Moloch. Linkthewindow  Talk  21:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
3. Spam and dupe. You also forgot to put the timestamp ;) --Janus ^talk 21:14, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
4. Spam I have some questions. Firstly. Barring an armoury why would you search in a dark building. Secondly, you don't explain if its 10 searches or 6 bullets or 6 bullets AND 10 searches. thirdly, is it only your searches, shooting that counts or anyones in the building? fourthly the benefits of generators and fuel is increased search rates for needles, bullets, first aid supplies. fifthly does firing two shotguns take as long as firing six bullets from a revolver, I'd assume the revolver would be quicker. Sixthly surely the people who would benefit mostly from increased hit rates in darkened buildings would be pk'ers. seventhly, did you take this to Developing Suggestions first? Eighthly, what if the building is ruined? Ninethly,would the short period of light be visible to people outside, or in neighbouring buildings? Tenthly if I attack the flare gun user within the 2 shotgun time do I get the same boost to hit rates? --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 21:33, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
5. Spam - As Moloch. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 21:34, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
6. Spam - As Rosslessness. Really, use Developing Suggestions, please? --Nevin McAvoy^(talk) 22:15, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
7. Spam - flares inside = survivor barbeque -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 01:41 9 January 2009 (BST)
8. Spam - I need no justification. --Pestolence^(talk) 01:58, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

---

Voting Rules

Current Suggestions Advice to Suggesters Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes. Advice to Voters You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam). It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.

Rules for Discussions Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20090108 Use of Flares Inside Buildings). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit. Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page. Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions. Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks. Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied. Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion. Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied. Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}} Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.

Invalid Votes Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide. X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others. Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.

Comments Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting. Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.

All Caps Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES Keep Votes Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill Votes Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Spam/Dupe Votes Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)