Talk:Lerwill Heights

Barricade Plan(s)

There are two conflicting Barricade Plans for this suburb. Yous probably ought to get this figured out, then move the plan you decide on to its own page -- as per the standard policy nowadays. --WanYao 00:21, 11 July 2008 (BST)

General Chatter

How does this suburb have a building called "The Beer Towers" and not be the most popluar suburb in all of Malton? I'm gonna be hanging around here for awhile....--Bruce1nR 04:32, 23 June 2007 (BST)

The world may never know--Airborne88^T|ZC|MI|E! 02:20, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 05:18, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Propaganda. Does this apply to the 1 line news items, or the commentary? Am happy to drop the latter, but would like more detailed justification for the former. I take great pains to ensure that the single line items are technically factual. --GoatFoam 8 November 2006 22:47 (GMT)

• Running the neighborhood page should be done without viewpoint bias as much as possible. Reporting that you have "saved" people when your group PKs large numbers of innocents is not something that is deemed newsworthy. If you want to report on what's actually happening in the burb feel free. --Gimmic 15:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Untrustworthy? Lies! The behaviour of the militia has always been both consistent and honourable. --GoatFoam 7 November 2006 17:45 (GMT)

Re added the Milliways Militia as I feel that all groups in the suburb should be represented on the wiki page. --GoatFoam 20:45, 1 Nov 2006 (GMT)

• Was planning on re-adding you all today anyways. You're correct- the neighborhood pages are neutral and all groups get equal representation. *finger wag at duglis
  • Hey now, I didn't remove them, I just posted a clarification on their bulletin.--Duglis 17:51, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Maybe it was an accident, but the link did disappear.
      • I'm not naming names here, but if you check the page history you'll see my edit was followed by a certain ireman-fay.--Duglis 23:46, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yup, I did a bad thing. But I stopped doing it even before I saw all this. Mea culpa, though. Bad sportsmanship on my part.--A big strong fireman 14:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    • No worries, I was there with edits of swift justice to clean up.--Gimmic 15:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Here Celt, do you think we should set up a weather report like we have for molebank? --Dolphin 18:30, 5 Dec 2005 (GMT)

Phone Mast status report

If you time, can we get you to update http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Mobile_Phone_Mast#Locations with the current status of your local phone mast? Thanks. Asheets 20:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

St. Columbanus's Hospital

The article says, "A safe entry point is St. Columbanus's Hospital." This is not true and according to the Hospital's article this hasn't been true for at least a couple weeks I know this may be because there's lots of activity in the area, but it's still confusing. --WhimOrClutters 02:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Barricade Plan

I know that at least some buildings should be VSB entry points, but all the TRPs and all three of the hospitals? Shouldn't one hospital, at least, be EHB-secured? Additionally, an easier-to-read version of the current plan is here. --BobBoberton 17:30, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

That doesn't seem to be the current plan? It doesn't match the linked one (see, for example, the Tennant Building @ 51,28 -- green vsb in your linked image, EHB in the plan, same with NW/SE of St. Willi's hospital). What leads you to think that image actually reflects any plan in place? For what it's worth, the DEM's report of the current plan matches the http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Lerwill_Heights_Barricade_Plan article as well. As far as all the TRPs, that's normal and even mandated for UBP-compliant plans. None of the hospitals are close enough to each other or to other standard-vsb buildings to justify breaking ubp. That's not to say this plan is UBP compliant, though, since it totally lacks VSB buildings that aren't TRPs (whereas your linked image includes them).

I'm sure you're aware of all of that already, though, so maybe I'm misinterpreting your message. Tofof 21:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I apologize for the confusion; I had taken the plan-image displayed on the main LH page (the Sebright Union's plan) and modified the colours so as to be easier on the eyes. Though it might be infringing on the Union's domain, I think we should stick to the DEM plan. If a Union member steps up and expresses a differing opinion on the subject, I'm sure we can reach a compromise. Though I'm not sure if there's active anymore... As for asking about the hospitals all being VSB, it was something a team member of mine had brought up. For right now, seeing how LH is under attack, we should probably just take and hold what we can and worry about the BP later. Ruins make good EPs, though they're not ideal, of course. --BobBoberton 21:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC)