User talk:Sniper4625

Signing edits

Hey there. Just so you know, you can sign your posts easily by typing four tildes (I.e. ~~~~) at the end of your edit. Once you hit save, it’ll automatically convert it to a standard signature with your name, a link, and a timestamp. Oh, and just to reiterate, you have not (yet?) received a warning. Thanks, and if you have any questions, feel free to ask here or on my talk page. —Aichon— 05:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Warning

Hello. Please don't page blank group pages. Continuing may lead to your editing privilege being revoked. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 22:23, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Regarding sockpuppets

Sysops mostly act in response to reports. If you think someone is using sockpuppeting to edit the wiki in bad faith, report it. If there’s evidence the sysops can act on, we’ll deal with it since we have no interest in allowing accounts created in bad faith. —Aichon— 05:30, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm not Dead, dickhead.

I was like banned for a billion years cuz I'm an asshole. Love, DCC —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DCC (talk • contribs) 20:05, 25 May 2018 (UTC).

I should have a spot here.

Btw - I don't really use the "watch" function.. But we could just move all our chatting here, rather than on my boring profile! :D -- Jack's Inflamed Sense Of Rejection (talk) 19:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Caiger danger status

I updated it accurately so please don't undo my edit. Also, yours is NPOV as you are stating something against ENVY that isn't true. stelar ^{Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge} 23:41, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

If you're suggesting that ENVY wasn't attacking defenders of Caiger, you haven't been there over the last two weeks. The fact that they've gone quiet for the last few days does not change the facts as they stood at the time I made that edit. Considering the current state of Caiger, Under Siege is accurate, I'm going to keep reverting.

It's under attack, not under siege. The barricade levels aren't indicating any siege activity. Calling out ENVY in an NPOV danger status update is not okay. You can have your beef with ENVY, but leave it out of the danger status updates. stelar ^{Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge} 23:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

So you're telling me 10 zombies phased through solid barricades earlier today? Because that's an inane statement. The fact that we repair the barricades does not mean they aren't being brought down. And if you're not allowed to call out PKer activity in a Danger Report, what's the point of it? Don't worry, it's sanitized now.Sniper4625 #4625 - |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ^TMG 23:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Not to mention your own group's history with ours - how's that for NPOV? Sniper4625 #4625 - |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ^TMG 23:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

The fact that the Globetrotters have PKed us? Where have I made any kind of mention about that in an NPOV? Or even anywhere? Not sure what you actually mean by that statement. stelar ^{Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge} 23:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Don't skip over the main point - the barricades of Caiger are going up and down regularly, so I'll ask again - are you here? Cause if you're making danger reports based on Necronet scans or whatever that seems inferior to those who have actually been defending Caiger for the last two+ weeks. And the NPOV refers to your general demeanor - it sure seems like there's a grudge against our group. Glad to be wrong. Sniper4625 #4625 - |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ^TMG 23:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

No, you said something about "your group's history with ours"... what did you mean by that? I wasn't skipping over any main point, I was replying to the comment you had made, but you seem to not have been able to answer that. What my issue with the NPOV is that you are specifically calling out ENVY PKing in the mall, when you know that your group are PKers themselves, yet you seem to make out that your group doesn't do that at all. Explain to me how saying that ENVY are PKing (when they are not a PKer group) is neutral? That says to me that you're trying to start some kind of fight. stelar ^{Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge} 08:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

A siege would require more damage than barricades going up and down, like if a corner is occupied. The zombies outside are clearly not coordinating well if they can't manage to get inside considering numbers too, so siege might be a bit far fetched. Aren't most of the zombies The Dead, standing still in the the street 1SE anyway? Smells like fake to me. -- ∀UDIO∀TTACK (talk) 00:00, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

under siege The mall is barricaded with a large number of zombies outside the structure. - I see nothing about occupied corners. Glad to see you've hopped on the Murderess conspiracy train though, I guess we should tell ourselves to stop breaking in. Placenta would probably be sad to hear he's one of The Dead now. Sniper4625 #4625 - |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ^TMG 00:24, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Siege: Survivor defenders are under siege from coordinated and/or large-scale attacks by zombies or PKers.

Attack: Persistent attacks from zombies or PKers, but the building is in no immediate danger.

I just went through Caiger and considering that you only mention once that the doors had been opened, and not really how many people died or anything I have a hard time seeing this as anything other than an attempt to POV the status in a manor that makes you the victim. Considering the amount of survivors, 10 zombies would never be able to wipe the entire mall, you know that too. :) -- ∀UDIO∀TTACK (talk) 06:38, 17 July 2018 (UTC)