User talk:DanceDanceRevolution
I win
Thanks to HTML--Orange Talk 00:18, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- I could win by altering the floating box code to go over it, but can't be bothered so :P --
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 00:23, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
It's obviously not considered standard if people keep going "against" because of how many are running. And you know damn good and well that saying it's not a vote in bold was needed. >:( -- SA 00:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Noes
I winz :P -- 
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 00:06, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Top of the new talk page
I win.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:57, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
First!
ಠ_ಠ --Orange Talk 23:58, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Angel is teh bestest sysops evar and I wuv him and never want him to leave the wiki agains!--Orange Talk 00:06, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
A/A
I noticed this particular line on the A/AG page (under "How to Arbitrate"):
4. Between them, the involved users choose an arbitrator
- The people in the case can choose any user of the wiki, be them listed in the Current Arbitrators list or not.
- You can see how an arbitrator has conducted their previous cases at Category:Arbitration Cases.
- If no arbitrator is agreed upon, one will be chosen by the administration team.
There is still no timeline of any kind (or precedent that I know of) as far as when the administration team chooses an arbitrator. But there does appear to be something on the wiki addressing it, if a little vague. --Maverick Talk - OBR 404 09:02, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- History is tangled. Look at the archive for the number of cases abandoned, sorted by users involved, sent to vandalism, etc. As for precedent, someone (was trying to set up an archive) of particularly ground breaking VB and Misconduct caes, but I can't remember who.--RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 09:30, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
