User talk:Yonnua Koponen

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Revision as of 16:31, 30 March 2010 by SamuRyjak (talk | contribs) (Group Massacre)
Jump to navigationJump to search

User:Yonnua Koponen/Accessbar

Discussion

[+]

Post any comments you have below this line, and post new comments at the top.

Archive


Re:Lines

Why do you have that line, when the + button you've added up there automatically adds comments below it? Tongue :P They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 00:35, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

I stole it from humourous suggestions. :P --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it has. I've grown tired of it not displaying for anyone but me, so I tried a new one. Other possiblities are here if you have a favourite. They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 14:58, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Strange. Well, it's already #3, so it'll stay that way. Cheers. They never lynch children, babies—no matter what they do they are whitewashed in advance 16:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Arbitrator

Hello, I hope I'm allowed to post this here. I would like the page Battle of Krinks to have a neutral arbitrator. That means; someone who rewrites the article NPOV. The WWSIS has also agreed on this. I would like to ask if you're able and willing to do this. Thanks in advance, --Cornholioo 9:21, 25 March 2010.

You know, you have an arbitration case up about this exact thing. You COULD just ignore all the trolling and rubbish and just do it that way... -- 09:43, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Then again, that's probably just what you mean. Hoping so anyway. nvm. -- 09:46, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
No, I was pressing a case against someone in the Philosophe Knights for editing the Battle of Krinks page. Then someone else completely edited that page and that was alright. Right now someone in the Philsophe Knights is pretting a case against me about the same page, so why can't I ask Yonnua Koponen to write the article NPOV in the meantime? I have also asked for someone to do that, but that was deleted. Oh, and the case you're talking about isn't about who is going to write this article NPOV. It's about an edit someone doesn't agree with. --Cornholioo 10:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
It's all well and good to tell Yonnua to write an NPOV version of that article, but then what? You can't replace Battle of Krinks with it because it's been protected due to the arbitration cases. You would have to go through arbitration anyway to force your new NPOV version over Iscariot's versions etc. So in the end you'd have to go through arbitration unless by some amazing coincidence, no one complained about the new NPOV article. So you might as well just get it done now with Yonnua as official arbitrator. -- 11:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
The NSU complained. And is the article locked for everyone? I thought just for Iscariot and me... Oh and I accepted Yonnua as arbitrator, but Iscariot didn't. --Cornholioo 13:14, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
I meant in a new case, a case to wash the others away as null cases since the end product of the page will be fundamentally and inherently different. And yes. The page has been protected via the wiki software so no one can edit it except for sysops. -- 12:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
DDR has got it pretty much bang on. And by pretty much, I mean he has. The only was a new version of the page can really go through is if it's done on the arbitration page. Hence, the case you've got with Iscariot, or a new case is your best bet. I'd personally say the case with Iscariot, to avoid excess drama from another arbies case.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 16:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
So you mean first make a new page, and then post it on the arbitration page? If yes, could you make this page then? Iscariot probably doesn't agree, but now it's his page out there which I don't agree to either. --Cornholioo 1:57, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
No, just carry on with the case against iscariot, and request that the page is made NPOV by an uninvolved party. Whether you specify who you want to do it is up to you, but it's likely that the arbitrator will either choose who does it, or do it themselves.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 12:11, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Camped Next Door.

What actually next door? 98% Survivors are terrible. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 21:15, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm still there. There's only one person left now. Meanwhile, someone revived my brain rotted zombie, so he's now removed the barricades on all the buildings within a mile of the NT. Survivors greatest weakness is foolishness. And not checking who they're sleeping next to. That too.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

People's Liberation Army of Malton

Yes, yes I do.--Rogue Medic 16:54, March 28 2010 (Pacific Time)

Group Massacre

How do I go about brining us back online?--SamuRyjak 17:31, 30 March 2010 (BST)