User talk:Alka Selzer: Difference between revisions
m (→Static Scans) |
Alka Selzer (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
:::::: What do you think? --{{User:Alka_Selzer/Signature}} 09:39, 17 May 2009 (BST) | :::::: What do you think? --{{User:Alka_Selzer/Signature}} 09:39, 17 May 2009 (BST) | ||
:::::::To be honest I think I prefer having them on the same scale -- it allows you to have both an immediate visual of scan ages and an overall view that correspond directly to each other so you don't have to switch gears if you want the bigger picture. I expect our best bet in terms of ease of use is to scrap my colours--status idea and just use them as a symbol of age on a linear scale (with the exception of the recent scan bit, since fifteen days is a little too long for a scan to still be called recent, I think). Also, when I had the idea at first I went to talk to the MOB about how fast zeds can drastically change the status of a suburb, and they essentially told me that a scan is worthless after one or two days, so... Yeah. {{User:VI/S}} 02:56, 19 May 2009 (BST) | :::::::To be honest I think I prefer having them on the same scale -- it allows you to have both an immediate visual of scan ages and an overall view that correspond directly to each other so you don't have to switch gears if you want the bigger picture. I expect our best bet in terms of ease of use is to scrap my colours--status idea and just use them as a symbol of age on a linear scale (with the exception of the recent scan bit, since fifteen days is a little too long for a scan to still be called recent, I think). Also, when I had the idea at first I went to talk to the MOB about how fast zeds can drastically change the status of a suburb, and they essentially told me that a scan is worthless after one or two days, so... Yeah. {{User:VI/S}} 02:56, 19 May 2009 (BST) | ||
:::::::: That means, if we're going to keep the 60 day maximum for scans, we could have 6 days for recent (green). The remaining 54 days would be devided by 3 = 18 days each. | |||
::::::::{| | |||
| style="text-align:center; width:30px; background:Green" | 0-6 | |||
| style="text-align:center; width:85px; background:#EE0" | 7-24 | |||
| style="text-align:center; width:85px; background:#F80" | 25-42 | |||
| style="text-align:center; width:85px; background:Red" | 43+ | |||
|} | |||
:::::::: --{{User:Alka_Selzer/Signature}} 18:47, 19 May 2009 (BST) | |||
='''Congratulations!'''= | ='''Congratulations!'''= |
Revision as of 17:47, 19 May 2009
- Alka Selzer - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---[ Userpage ]---[ Talk ]---[ My Templates ]---[ NW Recon Map ]---[ NW Scan Map ]---[ Alka Selzer ]---[ Alizia Backhouse ]---[ Doctor Deuterium ]--- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Good Job!Hey, im Bhuwannabe from the Anti-Zombie Squad and i've noticed you monitor almost all of the necronet scans/buildings status's around the scarletwood area of Malton. Just wanted to say keep doing whatever you're doing cause it's great and very helpful!--Bhuwannabe 21:20, 9 May 2009 (BST)
Static ScansHey, god of auto-editing code-bots -- do you think it would be possible to somehow get scans that are, say, 46 days old or older to be replaced on the NT pages with the static image, as here? CITIZEN VI 22:30, 3 May 2009 (BST)
Why not 0-5 for scans that count as recent, 6-20 for "old" scans that are at most useful for judging the general status of a location, 21-59 for scans that are old enough to be entirely worthless, but not quite old enough to be completely erased (signifying massive decay of records), and 60+ for scans that are so old that they are to be erased? You'll note that this is an uneven allotment of partitions, particularly with regard to the orange, but this way each colour actually has a meaning, not just a rough indication of age. CITIZEN VI 18:54, 11 May 2009 (BST)
Congratulations!...on getting over a hundred scans; it shows your determination, dedication and resourcefulness. Good Work!--Dr Mycroft Chris 13:54, 26 April 2009 (BST) Hey, where're you at?Hey Alka! I just repaired the Attwell Building and went to update it, only to find I just missed you by a day. Are you still around East Becktown? ~ extropymine Talk | NW | 4Corners 02:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
NecroWatchHey again! I was glad to see you come on board at NecroWatch! Your user page is coming along too, I've noticed. Anyway, I just wanted to check in again and say hi, and keep up the good work! ~ extropymine Talk | NW | 4Corners 09:00, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
NT ScanMapHey, awesome stuff with that by the way (I stalked this discussion on NW talk). I was just here to ask if you could have your script use Template:DangerMapnormala ghost town and Template:DangerMapnotablea ghost town instead of the "abandoned" variations. They're the same templates, but the wording of the status was asked to be changed by another user. I have changed it back so I was hoping to SD the "abandoned" ones in short order, but I don't want to break anything. -- RoosterDragon 21:46, 3 April 2009 (BST)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|