User talk:Linkthewindow

Link's Activity Level

	Totally Inactive. Sorry guys :(

	Passively active. Probably checking in a few times a week.

	Active, checking in once a day.

	Very active, checking in a few times a day.

	Insanely active. Probably watching you right now.

Speak!

Below is a shoutbox for shorter messages. Please use it in place of my talk page for shorter messages.

Please review the last entry on GA page please. As the only user against the vote I'd like someone else to rule. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 11:36, 20 August 2009 (BST)

hai link pm'd you on the forum hope that was ok! --mo ヽ(´ー｀)ﾉ ^{MCM MOB DB} 23:34, 15 August 2009 (BST)

hi, just one question: when adding a comment to a Suggestion page, what teplate should i use so I have my name and current date there? could not find it anywhere

The Only reason I reference Isc and Thad, is that there's been no one better recently. --I'm not the Ross UDWiki needs, I'm the Ross it deserves. 12:09, 8 September 2012 (BST)

Yeah, not to react but that's no joke the only time I've heard Iscariot's name in at least a year. That was actually supposed to be the joke. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:45, 8 September 2012 (BST)

I figured. This place has gotten really undramatic lately by the looks of things. Somebody throw a coup. Linkthewindow Talk 07:34, 9 September 2012 (BST)

Your observation is dead on. This is a very different wiki to the one we 'grew up' in. I'll say that, the the dead will return, I bet... A ZOMBIE ANT 07:49, 9 September 2012 (BST)

Not sure about that, the drama peaked around the whole Grim coup saga and has been steadily decreasing since. I've returned/lurked occasionally since I left, and it's become - and stayed - a lot less dramatic (which is good.) On an unrelated note, love reading my comments from three years ago. Linkthewindow Talk 08:01, 9 September 2012 (BST)

Lul. UD's numbers have been dying too I think that's the biggest thing A ZOMBIE ANT 08:31, 9 September 2012 (BST)

When writing, please keep messages as short as possible (longer ones go here). I'll reply here as well. Remember, click here to leave a message.

_{Stolen from this Wikipedia user.}

Retired

This user has left the wiki.

Welcome to Linkthewindow's talk page!

The Rules:	Please use proper spelling and grammar when editing. I know a lot of you can't spell, but please no chatspeak, lolspeak, or leetspeak. Of course, being my page, I reserve the right to delete a comment, but I hope never to do that. I will only delete spam. Also remember to sign your posts-it saves a lot of time.
To Post:	Ether click here or click the big + at the top of the page. Keeps it nice and ordered. Or, just post all new stuff at the bottom. If you post something in the wrong spot, then it will be moved without the post being modified.
Misc:	Archives are here. I'll usually respond here, but if it's urgent I'll respond on your talk page as well. If you followed a redirect from another one of my pages, please state that page before commenting. Please use the chatbox for shorter messages (located to your right.)

testing sig

JHORROR ^{Black Delta MH}

What do you think?

As you may have noticed, I've been working (on and off) on the Recruitment ad page. I'm running into a problem, however. It is easy to discover if an image is too large or too many words are used or if the ad is placed directly on the page. I've identified those ads. The problem I'm having now is that is difficult to identify which ads are the problem ads when trying to determine how wide they are. One ad that is too wide can throw off all of them below it. I've hidden and previewed the page without an ad to identify the "problem child" in a section and this worked until I hit the groups under "C". The ads run into each other, for one thing - and I'm not sure why. Secondly, removing one or the other adjusts the width of the remaining one, so I'm at a loss. I'm wondering if I'm missing anything obvious. Could you take a look? Thanks.--Lois ^{talk 10MFH} 17:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

In addition, the guidelines at the top of the page recommend using "auto-sizing". Is this the same as setting the width of the ad to 100% or am I totally off base on that one? --Lois ^{talk 10MFH} 17:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Drive-By Reply Yes, that's right. Or indeed any percentage since the box will "automatically" scale to take up that amount of available room. ZOOM... --

Rooster Dragon

19:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Congrats Link!

Congrats on sysop status link! seriously(with no sarcasm)you deserve it! Nuerotoxic2213 14:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

	A FREE COOKIE... OF EVIL!
	Dr Eddie Ashford has given Linkthewindow an evil cookie for his successful promotion to sysop.. Go on... eat it.

Next stop... Bureaucrat. lol! :) --D.E.A Talk 19:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Heh :). I don't actually think I'll make a good 'crat (I'm too nice >.>) Thanks anyway! Linkthewindow Talk 19:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Sig

Hmmm... What would cause the timestamp to go all screwy like that? All the span tags are closed... It's like there's a pre tag around the timestamp for some reason. --_Vic D'Amato__Dead vs Blue_ 11:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh wow, and check that out. Okay, at least the timestamp thing looks alright now. (Spoke too soon there too...) Now to figure out how to put it on its own line if it's going to break up. _Vic D'Amato__Dead vs Blue_ 11:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I'm just going to revert my sig to what was working before and test this in the sandbox more. --_Vic D'Amato__Dead vs Blue_ 11:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Looks like that did it. What'd you change? _Vic D'Amato__Dead vs Blue_ 11:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

User Hub

Dr Cory referred me here as you made the User Hub, anyway he asked if a bot could be made to maintain it since the issue has just arisen, and after checking the maintenance rules I think it's feasible. Frankly however, is it really worth my effort, or can it manage by itself? -- Rooster Dragon 22:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

It's not really worth your effort, as it's not a page that really needs frequent maintaining. I've been meaning to hop over there and fix it up for a while now. Hopefully I'll finally do it later. Linkthewindow Talk 06:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Apologies

For being a constant pain in the ass. Thanks for letting me know how exactly I am suppose to link pages like that. I kept thinking it was the group categories but obviously that was wrong lol.--President Jackson 00:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Re - Eric Bessette

He wants them gone. Thanks Link. --Janus ^talk 19:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

On a second thought, can you let them live for a few days? I want to see if he's going to come back. --Janus ^talk 19:09, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Enough time methinks. I'm posting the request on A/SD. --Janus ^talk 15:27, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Recruitment

Hey there. Saw you on the recruitment talk page along with some other people, but you're my oh-so favorite wiki overlord. I hear there's new rules? I'm looking to put up a recruitment template for FOXHOUND, and I don't know anything about the rules of the page. Can you run by me just real quick what's up? I mean the sizes and everything, whatever there is. I'm fine with the actual code of the template. Thanks for your time. --Met Fan ^F 22:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I could use some help.

I need help with my signature. I didn't know where to ask, so I'm asking you. Do you have any idea why I am getting this box around my timestamp in my signature. I just created my signature and I'm at a loss as to how to get rid of that box. You can see it there. --Turtleboy412 ^{Talk! In game} 23:24, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

You only forgot a and a :)

Here the code: [[User:Turtleboy412|Turtleboy412]] [[User_Talk:Turtleboy412|Talk!]] [http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1398380|In game] --Janus ^talk 23:44, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, that fixed it.

	A FREE COOKIE
	Turtleboy412 has given Janus Abernathy a cookie for fixing my signature

--Turtleboy412 ^{Talk! In game} 00:35, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Yay! *gives half a cookie to Link and runs away* --Janus ^talk 13:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

PTT

It says the malicious *something* was blocked when I entered the PTT page. You do a bit of wiki stuff elsewhere, is this right? Or am I just being paranoid cause it's chinese? Or is it the porn in the background thats sending the malicious software, not this window? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 06:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Doesn't look like anything, and a quick scan (of the admittedly huge,) code didn't find anything. That said, it's been viewed over 300,000 times, and the last edit was in January. If something was wrong, it probably would have been found by now. Linkthewindow Talk 06:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Yep. I rechecked it, its just one of the externals it links to is considered malicious. my scanner is just that good. Also, ignore new vb case until I sort it out with the user. Goodness may still just be salvageable in her heart. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 06:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

This page!

Could you delete it for me please. I made it in error. --D.E.A Talk 15:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Requested. Don't you just love bureaucracy ;P. Linkthewindow Talk 20:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Grats on Sysops!!

Hey linkthewindow, and i think i speak for all of the Anti-Zombie Squad when i say "Grats linkthewindow!"--Bhuwannabe 15:14, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Great Suburb Massacre 2009 - Rotter's Relief

Our Group Suburb Listings were removed under the assumption that we are no longer active. This is not so as we have an active forum that have new posts everyday or every two days. We believe that assumption as mentioned above was made as our wiki does not show that we are active. We are OK with that oversight (hopefully it doesn't occur again =D), but please be aware that we are always around to revive those in need and give them a chance to breath once more. Forgive me if the tone was a little too harsh as it was not intended. Cheers! --natakaasd, Rotter's Relief Co-Administrator --Natakaasd 08:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry about it - yours is actually one of the nicer messages! Linkthewindow Talk 09:00, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Protections

You didn't have to rub it in my face that I missed a few of your pages. :'( --Zs L 18:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Aww ;'(. I was being careful as the wikilawyers are lurking about... watching... Linkthewindow Talk 07:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Zombie Lord

Hi Link, Zombie Lord left a message on my talk page to say that he had deleted the discussion on the suggestion we had been working on and I was just wondering if he should have archived it? I would ask him but he might not know how. I will be putting a modified version up on Monday anyway but as I saw you might still be active I thought I would check with you... It was under the title "advanced rot" and he did it about 2am UK time. --Honestmistake 11:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

There's no real rules for removing a suggestion from the discussion page, as nothing there gets archived. Everything gets nuked. That said, you can keep a copy in your userspace if you want. Linkthewindow Talk 12:05, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

I liked your graph

But I like my pie charts better! --Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 18:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Check out my developing suggestion?

Hey man, I'm pretty new to UD but I recently thought of a suggestion. I followed the suggestion (haha) to post it in the developing suggestions area, could you look it over for me and see if it makes sense? It's about free running, right near the bottom now, but I think someone might move it later. Thanks! --ScaredPlayer 00:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Image:March 2009.PNG

We're a tough bunch to please aren't we? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 10:10, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

I was also wondering. whatcha think? too much nipple? If it excites me, should it be allowed on this wiki? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 10:24, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Going for a second opinion. I would delete it, but it's somewhat borderline. Linkthewindow Talk 11:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Danversbank Barricade Plan

Thanks once again. I appreciate you keeping an eye on it. What happens after two weeks? As a neutral third party, will you do the tally, etc.? --Paddy Dignam^{IS DEAD} 03:04, 29 March 2009 (BST)

Suggestions

Should all of them be protected? --Janus ^talk 14:18, 29 March 2009 (BST)

Aye, it's scheduled. Please don't request protections for them on A/PT as that would make the page explode (and it's discouraged - I've done it before.) I'll get to them later, but I'll be slow (school.) You could ask one of the other sysops, of course. Linkthewindow Talk 21:50, 29 March 2009 (BST)

User talk:Linkthewindow

Contents