Talk:RRF/Malton Herald & Sun: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Hopefully he can get to me soon, I've got inspiration for an article and I don't want it to fade with time.) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
I'll see if we can get it linked on our group page. The marbling is one of our best points. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | I'll see if we can get it linked on our group page. The marbling is one of our best points. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Thanks. I like your group a lot btw. -[[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 21:16, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | :Thanks. I like your group a lot btw. -[[User:MHSstaff|MHSstaff]] 21:16, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
==Do I ''have'' to?== | ==Do I ''have'' to?== | ||
| Line 66: | Line 64: | ||
...And so on... | ...And so on... | ||
This would enable near-instant coverage of breaking news without removing the issue-style archival. Thoughts? --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 07:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | This would enable near-instant coverage of breaking news without removing the issue-style archival. Thoughts? --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 07:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
|- | |||
| style="background:#FCFAF9; border-bottom:solid 10px #2a1818; border-left:solid 10px #2a1818; border-right:solid 10px #2a1818; padding-left:100px; padding-right:100px; text-align:justify"| | |||
Revision as of 07:04, 13 February 2011
 | |
NoteNote: I am only semi-around until probably April/May so it might be a while until someone gets back to you. -MHSstaff 17:19, 3 February 2011 (UTC) Back-up Talk / Talk ArchiveOriginal talk page (now archive) is at RRF/Malton Herald & Sun/BackupTalk. -MHSstaff 20:56, 22 September 2010 (BST) My work in process "real" talk archive is at RRF/Malton Herald & Sun/TalkArchive. -MHSstaff 17:33, 28 October 2010 (BST)
Like a test post or something?OMG! It's like a talk page or something for like some totally hot paper, where you can like, talk and stuff, you know? I know, right! I mean, like yesterday, this paper was all like "Graaaghhh Zambah Graaggghh" but that was SO LAST YEAR and LAME, and now it is like "Graaaghhh Zambah Graaggghh" which is like the HOTTEST PROM DREAMBOAT EVER! Totally! -MHSstaff 17:51, 28 October 2010 (BST) Loving the 404 Article.I'll see if we can get it linked on our group page. The marbling is one of our best points. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 20:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Do I have to?Is there any particular reason articles are written in chunks of ~6? Because I think they should be written whenever news surfaces, and replace the oldest article in the current issue, and then whenever there's 6 unarchived articles in the issue, it's archived. For example: ABCDEF - This issue contains 6 articles, titled A-F. ABCDEF ABCDEF - Because there are 6 unarchived articles, they are archives as an issue. GBCDEF - A new article, titled G, is written. It replaces article A on the 'current issue' page. ABCDEF GHCDEF - Article H is written, replacing article B. ABCDEF GHIDEF - Article I is written, replacing article C. ABCDEF GHIJEF - Article J is written, replacing article D. ABCDEF GHIJKF - Article K is written, replacing article E. ABCDEF GHIJKL - Article L is written, replacing article F. ABCDEF GHIJKL GHIJKL - Because there are 6 unarchived articles, they are archives as an issue. ABCDEF MHIJKL - Article M is written, replacing article G. GHIJKL ABCDEF ...And so on... This would enable near-instant coverage of breaking news without removing the issue-style archival. Thoughts? --VVV RPGMBCWS 07:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | |
