UDWiki talk:Administration/Promotions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Archive
- Archive1 - ??? - Jan 2007
- Archive2 - Feb - Oct 2007
- Archive3 - Oct 2007 - Apr 2008
- Archive4 - Apr 2008 - May 2010
Discussion
Moved or continued from the main page. New stuff goes on the bottom.
User:Axe Hack
OK, guys...last time I checked, the nomination does not get moved under Community Discussion until the nominee accepts the bid. I have not accept the bid yet, and have been moving it back to Still Requiring Vouches as the bid has not yet been accepted. I'm not moving it back up a third time now... -_- --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 00:07, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's true, I completely forgot about the accepting bit. Sorry! -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 04:29, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Piss, or get off the pot -- boxy talk • teh rulz 05:19 4 February 2011 (BST)
Jerrel
| № | Title | Content |
|---|---|---|
| 00001 | Logo | 
|
| 00002 | Theme | "You Haven't Seen The Last Of Me" by Jer (born Jerrelyn Sarkisian) |
| 09453 | Personal quote | "I may not be the best formating guy, but I'm learning." |
| 00174 | Campaign Cartoon | "The Tom and Jerrel Show" Realistic depiction of Jerrel's constant conflict with the downpressing cats. All the violence in this show is based on actual A/VB and A/A drama. |
| 00001 | The Truth | In 2 weeks from now, it will be April 15. And Jerrel will be a sysop by that date. |
I'm really amazed at the fact that this hasn't been put up any earlier. While there have been very good reasons to criticise Jerrel in the past, he has massively shaped up ever since.
He hasn't done a single bad edit in months - not in five months, not in six months, no, in friggin' seven months! That beats even Ross' track record, who has been put up on A/VB once during that time.
Apart of that, he is a nice guy who actively fights cussing on the wiki.
What could possibly go wrong by promoting someone like him? -- Spiderzed▋ 15:21, 1 April 2011 (BST)
- Strong Vouch - I like his campaign cartoon. -- Spiderzed▋ 15:21, 1 April 2011 (BST)
- ha! love the time stamp on this-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 15:34 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Againstmight be an even bigger tool than thad if that's at all possible -- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 15:35 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- weak vouch oh yer right. i am massively retarded.-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 15:46 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Strong Vouch - As Spider. ~
15:44, 1 April 2011 - Incredible Hulkingly Strong Vouch - His sound advice and patience in our many long chats on IRC encouraged me to keep playing UD when I was at my lowest. And, he can fly. I love him. ~ Kempy “YaketyYak” | ◆◆◆ | CAPD | 16:09, 1 April 2011 (BST)
- Against - way to biest for his own good --
TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 16:46, 1 April 2011 (BST) Who?er... MULTIPLE ORGASM VOUCH - I heard he was working on a time machine, so everything is kosher. Well, except for the time machine, I heard there was meat next to cheese. --THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS
LOE ZHU | Яezzens 17:42, 1 April 2011 (BST)- Questions
- What is different this time from the previous times you've asked for promotion?
- I notice on your talk page that you said that you wouldn't run again. What made you change your mind? Asheets 20:04, 1 April 2011 (BST)
- he hasn't acceptced the bid yet any way ash -- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 00:31 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- With a campaign this awesome, how could he possibly steer us wrong‽ Jerrel for
ModSysopBureaucratGod! ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 01:23, 2 April 2011 (BST) - Fucking Against - he "fights cussing on the wiki"? Fuck that! -- ▧ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 08:32, 2 April 2011 (BST)
It's no longer April fools... so that'll be quite enough of that. The user is unlikely to accept, given their last post was in August -- boxy talk • teh rulz 09:52 2 April 2011 (BST)
Archived Discussion
I archived the stuff from 2008 to 2010, as it's all painfully out of date. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 02:33, 8 April 2011 (BST)
- I reordered everything too, so now it should make some sense. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 01:10, 15 April 2011 (BST)
- I archived all discussion here to the relevant bids. and also removed vandal bids that were moved here. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 03:55, 17 April 2011 (BST)
User:Misanthropy
- Strongly Against - User has returned with the sole intention of being meatpuppeted in to the second crat spot so that SA will control both crat spots. Candidate fails multiple promotion criterion, and above all does not have the best interests of the wiki at heart.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 22:36, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- What the fuck
- are you on? Last I checked, Mis and SA have nothing to do with each other, apart from maybe talking? Certainly there's no “control” relationship that I'm aware of? And can I have some of whatever it is? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 22:39, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- Thank you for your input.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 22:39, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- Thank you for once again displaying your stunning Ignorance for public consumption. A note has been made. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 22:41, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- Thank you for your input.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 22:41, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- Surely he's referring to the SA forum, as opposed to the SA individual? --Rosslessness 22:42, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- Nah, couldn't be that, because that would actually make sense. ;) --Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 22:44, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- If you mean Something Awful, I am not now and never have been a member.
22:43, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- Thank you for your input.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 22:44, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- Plus he's totally "Irish". --Rosslessness 22:45, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- Don't expect me to do any work on St Pat's, but otherwise I don't think my ethnicity's going to be a problem. 22:47, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- Don't expect me to do any work on St Pat's, but otherwise I don't think my ethnicity's going to be a problem.
- Plus he's totally "Irish". --Rosslessness 22:45, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- Thank you for your input.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 22:44, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- You know, I suspect you're right. I should be surprised he couldn't be bothered typing the extra 13 characters necessary for clarity, because that would have required more effort than repeating the same shitty meme over and over again. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 22:55, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- Now that it's been shown that Yon is objectively wrong, is he going to at least edit the wrong bits out of his vote?--Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 14:02, 9 July 2011 (BST)
- Surely he's referring to the SA forum, as opposed to the SA individual? --Rosslessness 22:42, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- Thank you for your input.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 22:41, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- Thank you for once again displaying your stunning Ignorance for public consumption. A note has been made. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 22:41, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- Thank you for your input.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 22:39, 8 July 2011 (BST)
- huge vouch of course not. yon is a total thad. and it was funny when nubis said that not you. at least come up with your own burn. fucking tard. --User:Sexualharrison14:05, 9 July 2011 (bst)
- Strong Vouch - I don't think it's a secret that Mis and I got along pretty well, even when we were busy disagreeing vehemently with one another, so this vouch should come as no surprise. I always liked having him around as a sysop, because he was a no-nonsense sysop who wasn't afraid to speak his mind, didn't put up with BS, used a great deal of common sense in his approach (his opinions in debates, while oftentimes harshly stated, are just as often like a breath of fresh air in a hot and stale room), and knew enough about the rules to not make a fool of himself (EDIT: that wasn't intended as a back-handed insult aimed at anyone). He's definitely taken a more liberal stance towards precedents in recent months, but he has reasons for doing so. Also, his motives for nominating himself right now may be slightly clouded (I get the strong sense that he nominated himself because he wants to be able to vote on things again), but that doesn't change the fact that I have an unwavering confidence in his ability to act faithfully and capably as a sysop. —Aichon— 23:33, 10 July 2011 (BST)
- To be fair, if you like the fact that mis is strong and opinionated, then his desire to be able to vote on things again is surely a good thing?--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 00:05, 11 July 2011 (BST)
- I apologize in advance, but I'm a bit unclear on what you're asking. If you're asking me if his strong opinions and an apparent desire to vote are sending up red flags for me, the answer is no, they are not. If anything, those are marks of a good sysop, though both need to be taken in moderation lest we have a crusade on our hands (and even a crusade isn't always a bad thing, though it does tend to create drama). I don't like sysops who are afraid to say what needs to be said or are unwilling to take a stand when it needs to be done, and having a desire to participate in administrative affairs is basically a qualification for the job, which means that it isn't problematic (the motivation behind the desire is what can be a problem). That said, if people go off the deep end with both of those, then sure, that's can create a lot of drama around here. I don't think Mis has gone nearly that far, however, and as I said, I trust him to act faithfully and capably in the performance of sysop duties, just as he did before. —Aichon— 01:09, 11 July 2011 (BST)
- To be fair, if you like the fact that mis is strong and opinionated, then his desire to be able to vote on things again is surely a good thing?--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 00:05, 11 July 2011 (BST)
