UDWiki talk:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2009 07

July 2009

MoonShine

Cyberbob240 said:

Posting a humourous suggestion in the regular suggestions area. I'm tempted to take DDR to Misconduct for voting Keep on it but we'll see. --Cyberbob 03:14, 1 July 2009 (BST)

I'm at a loss of words right now. --Haliman - Talk 03:16, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Try going back to school then if you can't find anything in your vocabulary? --Cyberbob 03:25, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Bah. I expected a comment like that :P. Someone doesn't like everything with a pulse Fiffy, huh? --Haliman - Talk 03:27, 1 July 2009 (BST)

yeah clearly bringing a humourous suggestion which was posted in the main suggestions space to A/VB when posting humourous suggestions in the main suggestions space is vandalism has to be the result of some kind of bias right??? --Cyberbob 03:30, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Yep. --Haliman - Talk 03:31, 1 July 2009 (BST)

heh heh heh deliberately pretending like you don't know my comment was sarcastic is a p awesome comeback!! --Cyberbob 03:33, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Yep. --Haliman - Talk 03:34, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Fuck, thats why i hate wiki crats. Always mumbling about "Ohh, how am i going to power abuse today?" Fuck you, cocksucker. --Skouth 03:36, 1 July 2009 (BST)

I'm sorry it's not my fault I was abused as a child :( stop it daddy it hurts --Cyberbob 03:37, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Just common sense. Seriously, if the SysOp team does not rule this vandalism, then we no longer have SysOps worthy of their title. It's pretty simple, post humorous crap where in belongs. In the crap bin Humorous Suggestions Page. That's what it's there for.--

| T | BALLS! | 03:44 1 July 2009

This from the only person to vote no. -- 

•   Timmah!  

•   Talk  

03:46, 1 July 2009 (BST)

I would have voted Humorous in the SPAM section, but I'm boycotting the SPAM vote. Sorry.--

| T | BALLS! | 04:05 1 July 2009

Well said. Rules is rules. Don't call us power abusers because we take on the responsibility of enforcing the rules. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 03:49, 1 July 2009 (BST)

I didn't notice a whole lot of rule enforcement going on when you voted Keep. --Cyberbob 03:50, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Look harder? DDR can be very subtle.--xoxo 01:43, 3 July 2009 (BST)

u gay? (yes) --Cyberbob 03:00, 4 July 2009 (BST)

Ug, anyone arguing against this case needs to realize that while this one may be awesome, if we start allowing random stupid stuff into the suggestion system, it'll easily dilute the quality further then it already is. Remember, suggestions are for Kevan. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 04:01, 1 July 2009 (BST)

From the notfunny template:

"If you are unsure of a how a suggestion will be viewed by the community, it is recommended that it be placed on the Developing Suggestions page first, to gauge community support, and to improve it before being taken to voting."

As you'll see here i put it to discussion where it met near unanimous approval and i subsequently added it to voting. Oh and it was serious Fiffy needs laser eyes. <3 MoonShine 04:15, 1 July 2009 (BST)

I heard tell that DDR told you it was vandalism on IRC prior to you submitting it but that you (obviously) ignored him. --Cyberbob 04:21, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Not seeing it amongst his contributions though. Prior to this case being brought up, I see nothing warning of the perils of posting the suggestion. --Johnny Bass 04:28, 1 July 2009 (BST)

You dumb? Do you not know what IRC is? --Cyberbob 04:29, 1 July 2009 (BST)

We don't have your fancy IRC's way out here in the countryside. --Johnny Bass 04:30, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Logs or it didn't happen.--xoxo 01:41, 3 July 2009 (BST)

Ask DDR, not me (also lrn2edit) --Cyberbob 01:42, 3 July 2009 (BST)

You're sourcing it and drawing your own conclusions from it, thus if you want anyone to bother taking note of it you should provide the logs. Also move my comment to the incorrect spot again and i'll avb you.--xoxo 01:45, 3 July 2009 (BST)

case is over faygot, also I moved your comment to the correct spot because where you had it had my reply to Johnny Bass looking like a reply to you. go back to school --Cyberbob 01:48, 3 July 2009 (BST)

nice try retard. check the history then get back to me. --xoxo 01:51, 3 July 2009 (BST)

what am I looking for pray tell --Cyberbob 01:52, 3 July 2009 (BST)

you moving my comment to the wrong spot. --xoxo 18:53, 3 July 2009 (BST)

Tell you what. I'll keep moving people's comments to the right spot and you can take me to A/VB if you want. That way we both win. --Cyberbob 02:59, 4 July 2009 (BST)

A win for me would be you accepting you're wrong and moved my comment to an incorrect spot. That, or you flat out denying it while obviously being aware that you fucked up.--xoxo 05:39, 4 July 2009 (BST)

hope u like losing --Cyberbob 05:40, 4 July 2009 (BST)

good try but no.--xoxo 07:04, 4 July 2009 (BST)

im happy i have u to pass judgement on my posts.... im a very insecure person u know --Cyberbob 07:11, 4 July 2009 (BST)

Wiki noob Ephraim here, just found this. I thought a vandal was a person who makes a bad faith edit, and honestly, how is a joke in bad faith? But I wouldn't know, I'm new to these wiki politics. --Ephraim 04:33, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Yep. --Skouth 04:34, 1 July 2009 (BST)

It's a joke in the wrong spot, which is essentially spam. You're free to make funny suggestions but they need to be in the right area. --Cyberbob 04:38, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Yep. --Skouth 04:38, 1 July 2009 (BST)

On the contrary, everyone agreed (Unanimously) on DS that it should be implemented. --Haliman - Talk 04:39, 1 July 2009 (BST)

(they were pretty obviously joking too) --Cyberbob 04:40, 1 July 2009 (BST)

According to his last comment, it doesn't seem like it. --Haliman - Talk 04:41, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Yep, to both of you. --Skouth 04:42, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Suppose we were dead serious about giving Fiffy laser eyes? Then what would you have to say? -- 

•   Timmah!  

•   Talk  

04:44, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Yep. --Skouth 04:48, 1 July 2009 (BST)

The exact same outcome, except with the added bonus of you being seen as disillusioned. D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 04:51, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Because if people could get off by just saying 'me and my pals are serious', then every user could slither around the rules regarding humorous suggestions, couldn't they? D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 04:52, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Nope.--Thadeous Oakley 20:04, 3 July 2009 (BST)

durr hurr --Cyberbob 03:01, 4 July 2009 (BST)