User talk:Sgt Raiden
January
Jan. 2nd
I am currently holed up in St. Dionysius's hospital, In Millen Hills.
Jan. 7th
Currently in Stickling Mall, in Shearbank.
errr
You sure you wanted to edit this page ? --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 05:08, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Danger reports
Please be careful when changing danger reports. If you make a new report, remember to update the signature part to your own sig, otherwise can be seen as changing someone else's signed comments, which is impersonation. Also try to keep the reports neutral, there is no need for shouting and swearing on danger report pages -- boxy talk • teh rulz 04:29 15 January 2009 (BST)
Arbitration
Please be aware, I have taken you to arbitration over your continued false edits regarding the Mall Tour 2009. The case can be found here, please confirm that you will accept the case and represent yourself and select an arbitrator at your earliest convenience. I have stated a list of arbitrators that I will accept to aid your decision in this matter. -- 
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 05:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Just to give you the heads up, all the users that he has suggested are members of the Mall Tour. You might want to make your own list rather than use his. -- Cheese 16:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- You can also reject every arbiter and make the case go away if you want. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 17:43, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- But that is also seen as very poor form. More often than not, its best to just go through with a case, and make sure you pick an arbitrator that is going to be unbiased and fair.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 17:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Poor form but not against the rules. This is a concept that iscariot knows very well, but it doesnt hurt to teach him once more about this --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 18:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Right, because setting more and more of an example that isn't needed is only going to make things better. We want users to believe that arbitration is a useful tool. Telling everyone that you can just ignore the case and it will go away detracts from the entire systems purpose. Just because you don't like Iscariot, doesn't mean you need to promote bad form you know.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 18:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Its not because i dont like iscariot. But because he tries to game the system with this kind of behavior, since its not within the written rules its ok in his book to be abused. I say, let him have a taste of his own medicine. --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 18:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well, thats how it's sure coming off, I'll tell you that. I'm sorry for assuming you didn't like him. But anyway. Whether one user manipulates the system and abuses it like that or not, it's not something we should promote and tell other users to do. If one user makes a bunch of socks, and attacks another user without breaking a single rule in the process, would we tell the attacked to make socks themselves and attack back? No, we'd stop the original attacker, ban the socks, and make them follow the community standard.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 18:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Its not because i dont like iscariot. But because he tries to game the system with this kind of behavior, since its not within the written rules its ok in his book to be abused. I say, let him have a taste of his own medicine. --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 18:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Right, because setting more and more of an example that isn't needed is only going to make things better. We want users to believe that arbitration is a useful tool. Telling everyone that you can just ignore the case and it will go away detracts from the entire systems purpose. Just because you don't like Iscariot, doesn't mean you need to promote bad form you know.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 18:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Poor form but not against the rules. This is a concept that iscariot knows very well, but it doesnt hurt to teach him once more about this --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 18:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- But that is also seen as very poor form. More often than not, its best to just go through with a case, and make sure you pick an arbitrator that is going to be unbiased and fair.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 17:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Edits over Mall Tour '09.
I know you already have an arbitration case looming about this, but I'm in more of a mind to politely ask you to cease editing falsities on the Mall Tour. I don't want to involve you in pointless drama, so I'm asking you politely. -- Adward 22:09, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
NPOV
Learn it and use it. --WanYao 02:55, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Wan's brought up an arbitration case over these edits. Linkthewindow Talk 03:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes... I am sick of seeing them and having to fix them. People have spoken to you before about this, but you don't seem to care. Frankly, I also won't take your word that you'll stop making such edits. I seem to recall you saying something about not making edits re: Mall Tour '09... yet your blatant contempt for NPOV and wiki policies continues... unabated... Thus, I am seeking a binding arbitration to stop you from doing this.
- Yes, I'm annoyed... and not exactly trying to be nice, why should I??? --WanYao 03:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
