|
Use the '+' tab at the top in order to create a new talk section at the bottom. If I've come to you, let's keep the conversation there, if you're coming to me, I'll be replying here.
|
| The archive can be found here.
|
|
Thanks
|
A FREE COOKIE
|
| Linkthewindow has given The Rooster a cookie for for helping with the great suburb group massacre
| .
Thanks for your help (and also for lurking on my talk page so often.) Linkthewindow Talk 05:32, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
U doan liek..
..my congratulations for Link? :'( --Janus talk 13:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Of course not, he's awesome. Just trying to keep the news matter-of-fact tis all. Otherwise all the other recent successful promotees look unloved. Can't have people thinking they're not loved, or they might attempt a wiki-coup. --
 RoosterDragon  18:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, they could also hide. --Janus talk 21:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Sig
I've had it for 6 months and used it on both Chrome and Firefox and I never saw anything wrong with it. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 23:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Yet this sentence which I'm typing now will get overlapped horribly. Watch as this typical superscript with no size changes overlaps with the subscript quiet easily indeed. (I think I've got enough text there so that it will occur at most res's) The change you made to make the letters smaller fixes the problem when people use newlines to break text which is what happens most of the time. If text is broken with a br-tag (like this message) or used by a template in a similar fashion it might still cause problems with superscript. It is a rare occurrence though. -- RoosterDragon 16:36, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Preliminary Discussion
The design for the new main page seems good to go, however I'm discussing some supposed colour problems with Honest. Before I forget, I have a few good ideas for the Community Portal:
- Articles needing work - Meaning an entire list of articles, or ones of top priority
- Ongoing discussion - Things that wouldn't be on Wiki News but that require attention
- Community Projects - A full list of the active/ongoing ones, the rest archived
- Technical help - Technical wiki questions (not like "how do I sign?")
- General notices - Again, something that isn't announced on the main page but needs attention
- Other things the community would be interested in
Probably couldn't be all on the same page, so there'd be links to some of these (such as technical help). -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 19:59, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Good thoughts and some similar to some of what I had in mind too. I must pick your mind over whether the page is 'good to go' though. I did a count of the yays v nays and got 16v16. That's not a majority opinion by any means. We can't go acting on such numbers, surely? -- RoosterDragon 13:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- You have to read the comments they put. I've managed to shave down all the nays to basically "the colour". -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 16:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Unless you can properly address it, and even if you do, you'll still be looking at an unpromising ratio of votes to try and convince whomever happens by A/PT when you request it. -- RoosterDragon 17:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- There aren't any guidelines to implementing such a large change, really it just boils down to getting as much support through compromises and changes. I'm sure whatever sysop looks at the request will see what it's gone through to get it liked by everyone as much as possible and the fact that's impossible to get it yay'd by everyone, unfortunately. You'll probably find that there's a significant lack of complaining on the talk page if/when it gets implemented.-- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 18:47, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, one would hope so. I'll defer to you on that. Moving on, the CP does indeed need some major re-organization, and adding some of the above pages as sub-pages as needed will be a start. The actual CP page itself will need re-doing since it's going about everything all wrong. -- RoosterDragon 19:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Slightly off-topic, but do you see rounded borders here? -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 00:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nope :) I viewed one of the images somebody had posted in the main page discussion, showing the borders on the design. The aliased edges are pretty disturbing, so I get to win on that count regardless. -- RoosterDragon 17:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
STARS is still active.
http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/STARS -- President Jackson 16:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- And this concerns me how? -- RoosterDragon 17:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
EMRPs
Replied here. ■■ 19:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
|
