|
|
Use the '+' tab at the top to create a new section at the bottom.
If I've come to you, let's keep the conversation there;
if you're coming to me, I'll be replying here.
|
|
The archive can
be found here.
|
|
Power stations as resouce buildings?
I was updating Dentonside building status when I noticed that Tolman Power Station isn't listed as a resource building. The same happen to Krinks Power Station in Williamsville. I think it's ridiculous, because two very important items can be found in them: generators and fuel cans. Sure, there are only two of them throughout Malton, but so are forts.
I asked the same question on the Tactical Resource Point talk page, but I don't expect to have answers. For now, I'm going to take initiative and put both of them under "Factories" slot. If you agree on that, we can put them under Malls/Forts slot instead. And maybe give them a color in the barricade plans, as well. -- Kittithaj 05:39, 9 August 2010 (BST)
- Sounds reasonable IMO, I like your initiative. -- 09:17, 9 August 2010 (BST)
- I like it as well, since it's obvious we just overlooked them when considering the barricade plans and the like.
Sounds to me like they should be listed with forts and malls as multi-block TRPs for simplicity's and consistency's sakes. Should be listed with Factories, as you said, since it makes more sense in terms of what they have. I'll probably make the appropriate changes to the barricade plans and templates in a sec, since I don't see why there would be any objections. —Aichon— 16:31, 9 August 2010 (BST)
- Done. They should be listed on the barricade plans and on the TRP page. —Aichon— 17:16, 9 August 2010 (BST)
Sysop input requested
There's a sysop-only vote taking place, and we haven't heard from you yet. Check here. —Aichon— 20:23, 9 August 2010 (BST)
bot problem
EMR Bot is changing status overriding in-person scouting that was done the same day. I suggest changing it to not update anything newer than 48 or 72 hours. Also, it should take into account that EMR reports do not see barricades or anything (living or undead) inside buildings. -- Grogh 23:13, 10 September 2010 (BST)
- I asked him about it earlier this year. Might have some answers you're looking for. —Aichon— 05:34, 11 September 2010 (BST)
- Yeah I've noticed you've been fixing various edits that were less than clever for ages now. My original reasoning for this was the the suburb news would be a better way to see if an edit should be skipped (as explained in link given). Well nobody updates suburb news at all anymore, so that's become useless. It already skips updating for anything over a week old, but I also added a condition so that it won't update if there was a more recent edit than the broadcast time. (No more suggesting a status from a 3 day old report, when an edit was made yesterday)
- As far as accounting for indoor zombies and barricades goes, it already does that somewhat. The problem is that it's major guesswork, and that the "official" danger levels don't line up with what people tend to put anyway. That said, I'll see about tweaking the numbers a bit. --
 RoosterDragon  15:53, 11 September 2010 (BST)
- I know what you mean about the suburb news, and even the BIC's aren't getting updated much. Anyway, thanks for tweaking! -- Grogh 01:28, 12 September 2010 (BST)
replying here because PSP editing sucks
Credit only because he clearly C+P everything from my group. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 20:47, 14 September 2010 (BST)
- It's a table and some headings, you could claim half the wiki looks the same. -- RoosterDragon 20:52, 14 September 2010 (BST)
- True, but using the same color and ordering of each header? And the same "Under Construction" template? At least make a point as to where he found 'em codes. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:00, 14 September 2010 (BST)
- And if he does change the colour? And the text at some point? It is as you point out "under construction". If those change then it's just another group page with coloured background and groupbox and slab of text. -- RoosterDragon 21:06, 14 September 2010 (BST)
Sig
Set style="letter-spacing:-.2em" on the V's. Adjust value until overlapping. Also I pressed +, woo tab key -- RoosterDragon 05:49, 16 September 2010 (BST)
- It's perfect!
|
A FREE COOKIE
|
| Trips has given Rooster a cookie for working magic on his sig.
|
- As an additional reward, I'm breaking the rules of your talk page by bringing the conversation to it! Yay! --VVV RPMBG 06:06, 16 September 2010 (BST)
Sig Switch
Friendly notice that having a massive switch statements in your sig is threatening inclusion limits on several parts of the wiki, particularly BIC related stuff which will start to collapse as you sign more danger reports. Could I ask that you significantly reduce them? Pruning the main one to days of week would help a lot. It's not like anybody will read mouseover text anyway. -- RoosterDragon 21:26, 19 September 2010 (BST)
- Also I used + because I can. You realise the wiki will close off trailing tables for you, right? If you remove it, the + button won't leave new messages outside your table. -- RoosterDragon 21:35, 19 September 2010 (BST)
- Also, do what he says. Most of the folks that have stylized talk pages use that trick so that the + button still works. It also wikinewb-proofs your page a bit. —Aichon— 21:46, 19 September 2010 (BST)
- User_talk:Poodle_of_doom#New_Page. Ignore my poor spelling and talk of shrooms. --VVV RPMBG 00:08, 20 September 2010 (BST)
- Alternatively, if you want to keep the idea but want to cut the bulk down a bit, you could simply create pages at
User:TripleU/sigXXsaying where XX is the day of the month, each one holding a single saying that would have otherwise gone in your switch statement, then, in your signature, rather than using the switch, you'd just tell it to include User:TripleU/sig{{CURRENTDAY}}saying at the point where that switch statement goes. Yes, it means creating a lot of pages, but it also means cutting it down from its current size to around 1/30th the size while still keeping the same functionality. —Aichon— 21:44, 19 September 2010 (BST)
- I like this idea best, I'll do it now/soon/Septemper. --VVV RPMBG 00:08, 20 September 2010 (BST)
Hey Rooster,
A few days ago, Rosslessness suggested I help out with Category:Suburb History. It was suggested I help out with it because I'm looking for jobs, and it was fairly neglected. Since then, I have noticed that you've been doing a lot of work on it, and Screenshots seem to be appearing out of nowhere. Is this just co-incidence, or would you like me to leave Category:Suburb History alone and leave it for you to do? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dezonus (talk • contribs) 12:00, 22 September 2010 (BST).
- I do indeed have it covered, I'm often working in the backwater categories of the wiki so don't mind me if things start going crazy. As for screenshots from nowhere, I uploaded over 700 via a bot account, which are cunningly set to be hidden by default on recent changes so you don't have to put up with the spam. Fear not. -- RoosterDragon 12:07, 22 September 2010 (BST)
Those DHPD User Pages Again
For my sins I've been put in charge of the DHPD Wiki pages so I'm revisiting that question of all the user pages in our category
I know you said you had left all the ones that had been edited, if only slightly but I was wondering if that was true of, for instance, all these
http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Aceofdiamonds
http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Albright
http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:AmeliaPierce
http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Brett_Day
http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:F35
http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Joshua_Gray
(which only seem to have been edited by this Novelty person - whoever they are, unless I'm misreading the logs)
I was also wondering about pages like this one:
http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:Plash_Ricrem&action=history
Where the only edit seems to have been made, not by the User, but by their edit page? How does that even happen?
-- Sorry to bug you specifically, but you seemed like the obvious person to ask since we've discussed this before. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 18:21, 23 September 2010 (BST)
- It seems somebody in the group copy pasted the same exact code onto each user page (riddled with typos). I got all the ones were the user was a non-existent account or the page had been unedited which suggested they didn't want it or didn't even know they had their own user page. The others do have tiny edits, but everybody seemed to keep that copy-paste code for reasons beyond me.
- The revision history is wrong because Kevan had to clear out older edits on the server because they were slowing it down (maybe running low on disk space or maybe the software couldn't handle so many revisions). Those pages are all so old only the most recent edit survived.
- Plash's case was him editing the wrong page. His user page has a lower case r (and is blank, so you see the edit page when you click his name) but he was editing the page with an upper case R.
- At the time I was helping out even though there's nothing to say I could actually nuke the spammed pages, but the edited ones might have been edited by the actual user and somebody might have cared enough to Miscontibate my ass on it. I'm a wimp, should've just nuked them all and saved you the bother.
- Since I don't have sysopy powers anymore, I'll have to go through A/SD but I can't imagine anybody will object.
- Good luck with the organising. -- RoosterDragon 20:59, 23 September 2010 (BST)
- I'll need it. I guess I'll try contacting those players who are still around, see what their thoughts are. Then I'll take it from there. Thanks! Purple Cat ~ DHPD 13:51, 25 September 2010 (BST)
|
