User talk:Zyckde

Old talk can be found here and discussions about the various changes can take place at the bottom of this page. Project Dentonside To Do List Burges Towers --> 'History added' The Colbourne Arms Has received image, and some history that connects it to the area narrative Bridgewater Square School Added some historical flavour, and removed the stubb template Wasteland 95,52 Lax Cinema Ludlow Auto Repair Has received image, and some history that connects it to the area narrative Kidner Park Warehouse 98,53 Wasteland 99,53 Dentonside Police Department Warehouse 97,51 Horsey Square Fire Station Factory 94,54 Simplicius General Hospital Edkins Auto Repair Moorse Cinema Elvins Auto Repair The Silcock Building --> History has been written previously Warehouse 92,56 The Alcock Building --> History has been written previously Durban Library St. Hilary's Church The Bransom Building The Rye Arms Location Page Building Toolkit Lots of pre uploaded Images, that may be of help. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 09:49, 3 March 2010 (UTC) Project Dentonside Discussion hey Zyckde, great work on dentonside. Heres a list of all the pages in the area that currently have some kind of backstory. Might help you come up with coherent themes or new ideas. Theres still about 90 blocks with no details at all. Good work. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 10:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC) Thanks, I am will try to work on the list. --Zyckde 21:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC) FYI My character != me. I'm in-character on the Knights' talk page, and I'm in-character in-game, but everywhere else, I'm just me, and I wanted to make that distinction clear since you referred to me as "Aichon" when you talked to me in-game just awhile ago. My character is a pompous, arrogant prick sort of a person, and while I haven't given you any reason to think that I'm any different than my character, at least hear me out. Speaking out of character and for myself, I can totally see where you're coming from on most of the points you're making. I disagree on some, but not nearly all of them, and I do think you've made a few decent arguments. For instance, your initial comment was well-reasoned, I thought, and made a valid point. If you want to talk about any of it further, I'd be happy to do so on one of our talk pages. I apologize for any frustration I may have caused you here on the wiki, since it wasn't clear at all that I was speaking in-character before (I've gone back and changed my sig for the comments that were made in-character in order to make it clearer for future readers just "who" is talking), and I'm not asking for a free pass or an excuse from any ire you may have built up towards me as a result of the last few days. So, basically, if you still want to hold it against me, I fully understand and will harbor no ill will towards you. Anyway, from me, best wishes. —Aichon— 23:09, 22 March 2010 (UTC) <outofcharater> Thanks. To explain myself: I hoped taunting the Philosphes enough about the fact that cornhoolio claimed victory would make them act out. It spiraled out of control a bit, ahwel, what is the wiki without drama. ;-) Just a last thing, this could have been resolved very quickly if private conversations were possible on the wiki. </outofcharacter> --zyckde 23:27, 22 March 2010 (UTC)