Suggestion:20070928 Minor change to barricade descriptions
Dupe | |
This suggestion has been found to be a dupe of this suggestion. Dupes are easily found by searching for them in the main and suggestion namespaces. |
20070928 Minor change to barricade descriptions
Studoku 22:58, 28 September 2007 (BST)
Suggestion type
Interface improvement
Suggestion scope
VSB barricades
Suggestion description
This suggestion is designed so players can tell the difference between VSB (8 items) and VSB++ (10 items) and safely increase the barricade level if necessary. With this suggestion, barricades with 8-9 items will display as 'quite strongly barricaded'. Very strongly barricaded will only be used to describe barricades with 10 items. This means any building that is very strongly barricaded will be at the maximum barricade level that still allows survivor access.
There will be no change to the mechanics of barricades- only the descriptions will change.
Voting Section
Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user. |
The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
Keep Votes
- Keep--Actingupagain 00:01, 29 September 2007 (BST)
- Keep-- Simple, easy to use, and makes sense. Keep the good suggestions coming!!!
Kill Votes
Spam/Dupe Votes
- Dupe/Spam - This has been suggested before, but I can't find it. Anyway, barricades are already very strong, this would remove one of their few weaknesses. It would also remove the tactical advantage of a zombie with a few spare AP knocking down a couple of levels without it being noticed. A certain level of uncertainty in barricade levels is good -- boxy • talk • 00:28 29 September 2007 (BST)
- Duper/Spammer - I remember discussing this in another suggestion.-- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 00:40, 29 September 2007 (BST)
- This dupe vote won't count unless someone supplies a link. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 00:52, 29 September 2007 (BST)
- Spam/Dupe I know this is a dupe, I voted against the exact same stuff before.. I just can't bother to look for the link.--Wooty 01:32, 29 September 2007 (BST)
- Dupe You're all welcome. - SgtBop 02:57, 29 September 2007 (BST)
- Spam - Been suggested before and Boxy makes a good point too. --Sonofagun18 06:07, 29 September 2007 (BST)
- Dupe Dupe ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 13:28, 29 September 2007 (BST)
- SpupeTM - now 50% less likely to induce infant anthrophagy. --Pavluk A! E! 13:40, 29 September 2007 (BST)