Talk:THE TERMINATORS
Just a thought...
...but telling people their character needs "Terminator" in their name just to join will make this group seem like a Zerging group to people in-game who don't view this page (assuming there are indeed different players playing each characters). --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 03:19, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- Good point, but it is one we have already thought about thoroughly. After reading through the Pathetic Bill Group Page, we decided it can work, without cheating. It also seems quite rare for a group "not" to be accused of cheating at some point. --THE TERMINATOR 03:22, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- Pathetic Bill and Silly Lilly Pilly both worked only because the bulk of the owners are reputable established people some of which had to go forward and state the said character was theirs. He can go through with this but bear in mind you may be asked in the future to verify who is who on the zerg hunters forum. --
03:38, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- To be perfectly honest, and I shouldn't really be saying this in our extreme early form, but we were actually planning on assigning a different Terminator its own group of suburbs to patrol. Would that be looked at as cheating? From what I've read about this game, even one individual can have as many characters as he or she chooses, so long as they're away from each other and not working together. So I think it's safe to assume a group can do this? --THE TERMINATOR 03:59, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- A group can be groupwork, or a bunch of lone wolves. It really doesn't matter. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 04:01, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- I know it's kind of unusual, but that's what I've been considering. Most groups all seem to work together and be in one fixed location. But (at least to me), a group of Terminators side by side doesn't seem to work as well as every region having its own local Terminator. --THE TERMINATOR 04:04, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- Typopraphical error located. Zeroing in. 101s does not contain usage of the punctuation mark known as the "apostrophe". Error addressed. End of line. 22:37, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- Typopraphical error located. Zeroing in. 101s does not contain usage of the punctuation mark known as the "apostrophe". Error addressed. End of line.
- I know it's kind of unusual, but that's what I've been considering. Most groups all seem to work together and be in one fixed location. But (at least to me), a group of Terminators side by side doesn't seem to work as well as every region having its own local Terminator. --THE TERMINATOR 04:04, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- A group can be groupwork, or a bunch of lone wolves. It really doesn't matter. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 04:01, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- To be perfectly honest, and I shouldn't really be saying this in our extreme early form, but we were actually planning on assigning a different Terminator its own group of suburbs to patrol. Would that be looked at as cheating? From what I've read about this game, even one individual can have as many characters as he or she chooses, so long as they're away from each other and not working together. So I think it's safe to assume a group can do this? --THE TERMINATOR 03:59, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- Pathetic Bill and Silly Lilly Pilly both worked only because the bulk of the owners are reputable established people some of which had to go forward and state the said character was theirs. He can go through with this but bear in mind you may be asked in the future to verify who is who on the zerg hunters forum. --
Just a thought...With all those copyright pictures, someone's bound to be trolling soon enough...For example...C4NT used to be so full of copyrighted images from Dreamworks... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 01:38, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- Trolls are seemingly everywhere on the Internet. In short, it does not matter. -- SDN 10:54, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- What sort of terminators would they be if they gave a shit about our human copyright laws? -- LEMON #1 10:56, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Alliance request
Skynet Defense Network would like to propose an alliance. Do I really need to explain why? And yes, I realize you're somewhat scattered. Leon Silverblood 16:11, 14 September 2010 (BST)
- It would be a very obvious assumption to assume that an alliance between any Terminators and the Skynet Defense Network would hold. I will add the information to the main page. -- SDN 22:19, 14 September 2010 (BST)
