UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Zombie Lord vs Bob Boberton
Zombie Lord vs Bob Boberton
Case Origin
Clearly has no interest in editing my suggestions other than trolling them. I seek to have him banned from editing any of my suggestions in any way in the future. I will accept Boxy, Honestmistake, SA, Linkthewindow, The Rooster or AHLG as arbitrator.--
| T | BALLS! | 07:42 1 January 2010(UTC)
- These cases should be merged (this one, and the one above it,) as they're quite similar. We've done it in the past. Linkthewindow Talk 07:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Arbitration refused. If you want to place your ideas on Developing Suggestions and then arguably abuse the system by never taking them to voting, you've got no sympathy from me when you cry foul. Oh, and I'll pass on - in your words - "nerd court." --Bob Boberton TF / DW 
14:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- As Bob refuses to pick an Arbitrator, I will await any of my choices to pick this case up. We can then move forward with this case.-- | T | BALLS! | 19:44 1 January 2010(UTC)
- No thanks. How about you just ask me nicely, say, on my talk page? Oh right, the thing. Anyway, your requested result is a bit absurd; you should limit it to DS. "banned from editing any of my suggestions in any way in the future" could also mean suggestions you put to a vote, however ... unlikely that is to happen. Also note you'll be hard-pressed to force this case through without my consent, as precedence shows. Also, your attitude of assuming bad faith and tritely summarizing any disagreement (including those made in your own condescending tone) as "trolling" doesn't help. I could say you're "trolling" me now with frivolous arbitration and vandal banning reports. --Bob Boberton TF / DW
21:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- I will say that I will see this case and any others finished properly because I'm tired of you fuckers abusing A/A. He either drops the case himself or a representative will be picked for you if you don't want to have anything to do with it. It's high time people stopped this shit.-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 21:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Or third option; see bottom of this header. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 22:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you!-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 22:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- hot damn did this page get long quick right? --Bob Boberton TF / DW 22:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- hot damn did this page get long quick right? --Bob Boberton TF / DW
- Thank you!-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 22:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Or third option; see bottom of this header. --Bob Boberton TF / DW
- I will say that I will see this case and any others finished properly because I'm tired of you fuckers abusing A/A. He either drops the case himself or a representative will be picked for you if you don't want to have anything to do with it. It's high time people stopped this shit.-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 21:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- No thanks. How about you just ask me nicely, say, on my talk page? Oh right, the thing. Anyway, your requested result is a bit absurd; you should limit it to DS. "banned from editing any of my suggestions in any way in the future" could also mean suggestions you put to a vote, however ... unlikely that is to happen. Also note you'll be hard-pressed to force this case through without my consent, as precedence shows. Also, your attitude of assuming bad faith and tritely summarizing any disagreement (including those made in your own condescending tone) as "trolling" doesn't help. I could say you're "trolling" me now with frivolous arbitration and vandal banning reports. --Bob Boberton TF / DW
This drama-fest is getting pretty large now. But yeah, these cases are completely worthless. You can't ban other people's opinion from Developing Suggestions just because you don't like them. --
Thadeous Oakley 15:21, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. Just because someone disagrees, doesn't mean they're wrong.-- Adward 19:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- He can get them banned if people be trollin' though. Which from what I do actually know they've been doing a bit of it.-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 21:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Who are "they", and isn't this more of an edit-war than straight up trolling? Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 21:37, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- You would be one of them, what with the consistent don't feed the trolls template you throw on his shit. Anyway, why the shit are these separate cases?-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 21:40, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Drama/attention/lulz/stubbornness? Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 21:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Plus, DS is a free system, and he's never even nicely asked me to stop. It's not like I put that on all his ideas, just the ones I think are placed for the sole purpose of getting people to argue with him. You know: most of them. Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 21:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- I split the cases because Bob openly refused to pick an Arbitrator. That way we can move on this case as soon as an Arbitrator picks it up, and not wait on the LeDouche case due to his his foot-dragging.-- | T | BALLS! | 22:04 1 January 2010(UTC)
- You would be one of them, what with the consistent don't feed the trolls template you throw on his shit. Anyway, why the shit are these separate cases?-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 21:40, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Who are "they", and isn't this more of an edit-war than straight up trolling? Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 21:37, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- He can get them banned if people be trollin' though. Which from what I do actually know they've been doing a bit of it.-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 21:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Drama-less option: Yeah, sure, I'll take your A/A spam as a request to stop. I'll stop commenting on any suggestions you submit to Developing Suggestions (including deletion warnings and cycling). I reserve the right to freely comment on suggestions you put to voting, and other people's suggestions on DS. Deal? hell all i'd be posting would be "this is a bad idea" anyway--Bob Boberton TF / DW 22:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- You have exhausted my generosity, troll, so I won't accept just "your word". I will accept the above only as long as it is put through Arbies officially. We can wrap this up in a drama-less 5 minutes.-- | T | BALLS! | 22:29 1 January 2010(UTC)
- I'll arbitrate this ruling through.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Accepted; done, on one additional condition: no editing of one another's talk pages. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 22:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- I'd guessed that. ZL, am I accepted to push through this ruling?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:32, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- I would prefer SA to shepherd this through.-- | T | BALLS! | 22:52 1 January 2010(UTC)
- But I'm here NOW! :( --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, he-who-arbitrates is really irrelevant for this case. Also, I accept only Yonnua as arbitrot, to speed things along. --Bob Boberton TF / DW 22:57, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, he-who-arbitrates is really irrelevant for this case. Also, I accept only Yonnua as arbitrot, to speed things along. --Bob Boberton TF / DW
- But I'm here NOW! :( --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- I would prefer SA to shepherd this through.-- | T | BALLS! | 22:52 1 January 2010(UTC)
- If you wish. I will accept being banned from your Talk Page. I don't care if you use my Talk Page or not, so that part is optional as far as I'm concerned. Up to you.-- | T | BALLS! | 22:52 1 January 2010(UTC)
- I'd guessed that. ZL, am I accepted to push through this ruling?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:32, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Accepted; done, on one additional condition: no editing of one another's talk pages. --Bob Boberton TF / DW
- I'll arbitrate this ruling through.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
I've been accepted on Zombie Lord's talk. I'll whip up a case right now.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Ruling
Forgoing the normal length and drama of an arbitration case, I’ll just post the ruling agreed upon by the users in question. The terms are:
- User:BobBoberton will not comment on any suggestions User:Zombie Lord submits to Developing Suggestions (including deletion warnings and cycling).
- User:BobBoberton reserves the right to freely comment on suggestions User:Zombie Lord puts to voting, and other people's suggestions on DS.
- Neither user will comment on each other’s talk pages for 2 months.
--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- Accepted as-is. GOOD END --Bob Boberton TF / DW 23:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
