User talk:Larry Johnson 27

Crit9

Please do not place articles about yourself or your characters in the main namespace. If you wish to write about yourself or your characters, the correct place to do it is in your User space (ie User:Larry Johnson 27). The pages you have created have since been moved to their correct places. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 02:05, 4 August 2006 (BST)

You're killing your father, Larry! -- Pvt Walter Sobchak 1100 hours, 1 September 2006 (EDT)

Channel 4 News Team

Yes, actually, I think the combat revive is one of the best ways to get them. A "good candidate" for a combat revive is a low level zombie with no survivor skills who will end up dead again very quickly and at the cost of a lot of AP. This is Shacknews through and through. Of course, there are those who say it's an Unclassy tactic and that's worth something. There's also a good point to be made that it's a waste of a revive; you could have helped get another survivor on his feet and that's another way to defeat Shacknews. There are only so many of them and, since their strength comes in punching thorugh a defence again and again until there are no people left to defend, you might be able to at least reach a war of attrition with a really, really effective revive plan (one which revives as many as the zombies kill each day). Of course, that's damn near impossible.

Ultimately, I think the combat revive is the best option of the two, but that's only if you've got a large number of people doing it- enough to slow them down sufficiently. Since that's a near impossibility, the best option in the real world seems to be to accept what's coming and take it standing! Keep the revives for survivors so more people can do so! Make for more combatants and, therefore, a more Glorious Battle!

Stay Classy! --Ron Burgundy 06:58, 24 October 2006 (BST)