User talk:Samual Clemons

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

First Warning

Please do not strike news reports in bad faith on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, you may be banned from editing the wiki. –Bob Hammero ModB'cratTA 00:41, 7 August 2006 (BST)

Second Warning

Please do not continually makes edits in bad faith on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges will be revoked. This is your last warning. –Xoid STFU! 16:20, 7 August 2006 (BST)

I'm more than a little confused. I was sick of seeing 'cheaters' painted inside of morrish every other day prob and made the grave error of using a strike through on the history page on the UNSIGNED zed entry, no matter how 'evidence free' the accusations of barricade bots and cheating are. However, there is no reason for the repeated deletion of my recent entry :
August 6th, 2006 MORRISH NT becomes the symbol for conspiracy theories, sore losers and whiners everywhere as the burb goes green for the first time in a month. Still plagued by Stallone's, and PKr's, survivors start a building by building search for remaining targets in the neighborhood, while enjoying copious amounts of free beer. --Samual Clemons
-this entry is neither in bad faith, nor is it untrue. Can you please explain to me why it's OK for a zed to accuse everyone in Pitneybank of cheating in Pitneybanks history repeatedly, but it's not ok for a survivor to note that this is the behavior of sore losers? That's just nonesense! If the Aug 6th entry is NOT ok, then neither are entries that accuse Pitneybank of cheating sans hard (or any) evidence. SC has now retreacted some more of the heresay evidence in the discussion page for Pitneybank. Please reinstate this entry, or remove ALL entries from the history that show any bias. Thanks! --Samual Clemons
Has to do with how differences of opinion are handled on the wiki. If you disagree with something (i.e. the entry that contradicts the first entry being removed), instead of reinserting it, or striking out the first entry you are supposed to talk it over with person who made the first edit, or if you cannot come to a compromise, take it to arbitration. This rule of thumb is to prevent useless revert wars. –Xoid STFU! 02:10, 8 August 2006 (BST)
See M/VB as to my decision to retract the warning. –Xoid STFU! 02:50, 8 August 2006 (BST)

Criterion 9 and signage.

  1. Samual Clemons has been nominated for speedy deletion. Please see the relevent criterion on the speedy deletion page as to why.
  2. Please sign your edits on the wiki. You can do this either by typing ~~~~ (four tildes), or by pressing the http://wiki.urbandead.com/skins/common/images/button_sig.png button in the editing toolbar. Signing your edits in the standard format makes it much easier to identify who has made changes and when, and creates less work for moderators and other wiki users. Thank you. –Xoid STFU! 02:12, 8 August 2006 (BST)
There is no information concerning this Criterion 9/Samual Clemons through the above link. Speedy Deletion? who nominated this and why? All I have done since the 'strike through' incident is repost a news header that had nothing to do with the strike through incident and it was deleted again as if it was. I will be entering this matter into Arbitration, rest assured, dont delete my account while i am compiling my case to do just that please. I have signed every edit that I have made, as far as I am aware, unlike the biased news articles posted by Sonny C. as NEWS on Pitneybanks page.--Samual Clemons 02:36, 8 August 2006 (BST)
Two things first:
  1. Don't bother with arbitration about Samual Clemons, taken from the speedy deletion criteria: "9. Personal Page (Prefix Rule): The page is named after a user without the "User:" or "Journal:" prefixes and its content has been moved to the appropriate User or Journal page. Includes pages that should be User subpages, ie. in-game characters." I.e. User:Samual Clemons is fine, but Samual Clemons is not.
  2. The problem with the way you signed previously was due to:
    A) The lack of a timestamp.
    B) The link from your name led to Samual Clemons instead of User:Samual Clemons
Xoid STFU! 02:50, 8 August 2006 (BST)
Err...I did not make that news entry. Check the history. I was the one reverting news entries. Sonny Corleone WTF RRF ASS 02:52, 8 August 2006 (BST)