User talk:Sgt Whiskey Swiper

Hey, was there any point to Army Control Corpsaction=edit or is it simply a mistake and the page can be deleted? --Daranz-Talk 14:00, 17 Oct 2005 (BST)

To Shubeck or not to Shubeck

Col. Shubeck of the ACC, same person as The Shubeck Issue? --Gilant 22:36, 7 Feb 2006 (GMT)

OK, good to know he's on the up and up then. :) But perhaps you may want to mention that he's back and everything is OK on the groups wiki page then? When I came to check out your group, I was afraid he may be trying to mess with you somehow. --Gilant 13:35, 8 Feb 2006 (GMT)

Warning

Please do not vandalise other User pages on this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, you may be banned from editing the wiki. --A Bothan Spy ^{Mod WTF U!} 14:54, 30 May 2006 (BST)

It's best to use the talk/discussion page. next time somebody edits your user page don't retaliate, but report it to the vandal banning page.--Vista 16:00, 30 May 2006 (BST)

I can understand that you're not happy about this. Indeed neither whould I. But it is just the one warning. It's no big deal. certianly seeing your edit history I doubt your functioning on this wiki will be much hampered. Just make sure next time if somebody is bothering you you complain to him on the talkpage. or report him to the vandal banning page. As it wasn't my case but cyberbobs you could try to convince him that he reacted a bit hasty, if you feel that he was. on the whole I have little say in this as I wasn't the moderator on duty. --Vista 19:45, 30 May 2006 (BST)

I was teetering on the edge of not reporting you. But you didn't sign that post. If it was an acutal message, signed, then I would've assumed, "Oops, he posted on someone else's page instead of their talk page. Copy to talk page, revert user page."

Regardless, if enough time passes before you do something questionable, a single, old warning will likely be considered irrelevant. Don't sweat over it too much. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 08:10, 31 May 2006 (BST)