UDWiki talk:Administration/Demotions: Difference between revisions
m (→Cyberbob: fix) |
m (→Cyberbob: fix again) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::Done. Especially since I was talking to Bob, which you aren't, and the fact your post has zero to do with his demotion. Go bother someone else. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 22:51, 10 March 2010 (UTC) | ::Done. Especially since I was talking to Bob, which you aren't, and the fact your post has zero to do with his demotion. Go bother someone else. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 22:51, 10 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::No, I think you'll find that I was ''directly addressing'' something you had said so my comment remains in the realms of relevancy, and that relevancy is what you brought onto the page. | :::No, I think you'll find that I was ''directly addressing'' something you had said so my comment remains in the realms of relevancy, and that relevancy is what you brought onto the page. | ||
:::And even then, that above point I just made is simply pointless as this isn't governed by A/VB. I simply meant if you wish to make more of your stupid calls ''then'' take it to my talk page. Once again your amazing english repertoire fails you. Leave it on or find yourself facing a vandal case. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 22:59, 10 March 2010 (UTC) | :::And even then, that above point I just made is simply pointless as this isn't governed by A/VB's rules. I simply meant if you wish to make more of your stupid calls ''then'' take it to my talk page. Once again your amazing english repertoire fails you. Leave it on or find yourself facing a vandal case. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 22:59, 10 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:16, 10 March 2010
Is there a certain amount of time that we should leave demotion requests on the page before archiving them so people know? Or should they be moved as soon as completed so that they can step down quietly? And the page should probably be clarified to read a moderator may only request that him or herself be demoted - it currently could be misunderstood as trying to get someone else demoted. --Darth Sensitive W! 01:34, 20 September 2006 (BST)
- I don't think the requests need to stay up for long after they've been completed. Go ahead and fix the wording to how you think it should read. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 01:59, 20 September 2006 (BST)
Request
I'd like to request a demotion process for a mod. How would I go about this, officially? -- Basil 20:28, 8 October 2006 (BST)
- You don't. This is where a moderator requests their own demotion. Feel free to put your request up though, I know you want to. –Xoid S•T•FU! 15:46, 9 October 2006 (BST)
- HA! Nice one. ...You were joking, right? I mean, I really don't see how someone who's come from the SW wiki to stir up trouble has any grounds for having someone demoted. Cyberbob Talk 22:00, 9 October 2006 (BST)
Cyberbob
You honestly can't be a worse crat then...OH SNAP. Too bad you have to go though. I guess I can at the very least wish you the best of luck with Uni and other future endeavors. --Thadeous Oakley 22:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- If you're going to be this overly retaliatory just because I tear you and your terrible group apart on a regular basis, at leased put these stupid comments on a talk page, please. --
- Done. Especially since I was talking to Bob, which you aren't, and the fact your post has zero to do with his demotion. Go bother someone else. --Thadeous Oakley 22:51, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- No, I think you'll find that I was directly addressing something you had said so my comment remains in the realms of relevancy, and that relevancy is what you brought onto the page.
- And even then, that above point I just made is simply pointless as this isn't governed by A/VB's rules. I simply meant if you wish to make more of your stupid calls then take it to my talk page. Once again your amazing english repertoire fails you. Leave it on or find yourself facing a vandal case. -- 22:59, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
22:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Especially since I was talking to Bob, which you aren't, and the fact your post has zero to do with his demotion. Go bother someone else. --Thadeous Oakley 22:51, 10 March 2010 (UTC)